Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 26 to paragraph 24

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 26 to paragraph 24
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
86 for · 345 against · 51 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 20 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - § 24 - Am 26
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176270
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 86 for, 345 against, 51 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 26Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 81Abst. 0No vote 55 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 57Abst. 0No vote 18 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 113Abst. 0No vote 75 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 10Against 3Abst. 48No vote 19 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.68
PatriotsFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 23 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 18Abst. 2No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
No groupFor 11Against 3Abst. 1No vote 14 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia001
Germany0140
France100
Poland010
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 482 members

No vote recorded, 237

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 237 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment168 for, 445 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 436 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 33 Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU importsAmendment157 for, 493 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 467 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemAmendment160 for, 404 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Renew, Membersr · shared0.87 412 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.87 300 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 114 to paragraph 22 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment178 for, 466 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 443 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineAmendment122 for, 391 against, 63 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.86 400 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.85 303 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 111, adding text after paragraph 10 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment183 for, 456 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 439 voters
10 Feb 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther99 for, 317 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 23 %r · shared0.85 305 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment157 for, 428 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 441 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176270
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176270, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176270 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176270,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176270}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176270},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176270, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}