Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 23 — part 2, after paragraph 21

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 23 — part 2, after paragraph 21
Result
168 for · 312 against · 1 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 19 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: EPP
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 21 - Am 23/2
Vote id
176269
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 168 for, 312 against, 1 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 25Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 80Abst. 0No vote 56 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 5Against 52Abst. 0No vote 18 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 4Against 108Abst. 0No vote 76 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 61Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 61Against 1Abst. 0No vote 23 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 1Abst. 1No vote 14 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Czechia040
Germany0190
Denmark010
Estonia020
Spain050
Finland010
France040
Croatia030
Hungary050
Ireland040
Italy080
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta010
Netherlands240
Poland0200
Portugal040
Romania060
Sweden050
Slovenia200
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 481 members

No vote recorded, 238

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 238 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 17 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment191 for, 387 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 406 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 417 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 419 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 50 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment198 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 439 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 432 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 409 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment180 for, 381 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 407 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 94 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment202 for, 430 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 432 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 13 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment211 for, 437 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 436 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 20 to paragraph 55 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment186 for, 458 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 445 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 413 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 23 — part 2, after paragraph 21 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176269, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176269 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176269,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 23 — part 2, after paragraph 21 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176269}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176269},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176269, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}