Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 2

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 2
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
386 for · 87 against · 27 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - § 4/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176257
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 386 for, 87 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 27Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 86Against 0Abst. 0No vote 50 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 59Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 116Against 3Abst. 0No vote 69 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 59Against 0Abst. 4No vote 17 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 11Against 30Abst. 22No vote 22 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 2Against 19Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 7Against 8Abst. 1No vote 13 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Germany1200
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland200
France500
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 500 members

No vote recorded, 219

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 219 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Final vote The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter seasonFinal425 for, 106 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.86 496 voters
8 Oct 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EC-Côte d’Ivoire Fisheries Partnership Agreement – Protocol on the implementation of the Agreement for 2025-2029Final520 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.83 443 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketFinal459 for, 65 against, 90 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.82 434 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 5 — part 1 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Split vote481 for, 132 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 450 voters
10 Mar 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024Final493 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.81 437 voters
13 Feb 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaSeparate vote390 for, 109 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.81 403 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 3 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote408 for, 96 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 389 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesFinal492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.81 464 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 46 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 451 voters
9 Oct 2024Paragraph 22 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaSplit vote487 for, 113 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by EPP, ESNr · shared0.81 459 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176257
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 4 — part 2 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176257, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176257 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176257,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 2 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176257}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176257},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176257, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}