Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22 — part 2, after paragraph 2

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 22 — part 2, after paragraph 2
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
157 for · 337 against · 6 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: EPP
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 2 - Am 22/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0246
Dossier
2025/2542(RSP)
Vote id
176254
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 157 for, 337 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 25Abst. 2No vote 19 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 86Abst. 0No vote 50 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 5Against 54Abst. 0No vote 16 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 3Against 115Abst. 0No vote 70 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 62Against 2Abst. 0No vote 16 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 20Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 4Against 9Abst. 3No vote 13 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1400
France100
Poland100
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 500 members

No vote recorded, 219

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 219 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 261 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment185 for, 459 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.95 452 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 358 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment177 for, 453 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 443 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 264 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment181 for, 461 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.95 450 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 365 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 451 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 352 to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment181 for, 453 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 444 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 259 to recital 18 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment179 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ESN, ECRr · shared0.95 450 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 357 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 454 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 450 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 372 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment185 for, 458 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 450 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 356 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment184 for, 457 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 449 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 262 to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 459 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, ESNr · shared0.95 449 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176254
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 22 — part 2, after paragraph 2 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176254, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176254 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176254,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22 — part 2, after paragraph 2 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176254}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176254},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176254, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}