Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22 — part 1, after paragraph 2

Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market

Vote
Amendment 22 — part 1, after paragraph 2
Result
286 for · 183 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:52
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 40 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: EPP
Official label
B10-0246/2025 - Après le § 2 - Am 22/1
Vote id
176253
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 286 for, 183 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 57 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘political pressure to expand’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 19 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 44Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 86Abst. 1No vote 49 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 46Against 12Abst. 1No vote 16 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
EPPFor 114Against 5Abst. 0No vote 69 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 38Against 0Abst. 24No vote 23 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
ESNFor 20Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 9Abst. 4No vote 13 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium100
Czechia900
Denmark100
Spain600
France0024
Italy500
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 499 members

No vote recorded, 220

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 220 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural427 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.90 466 voters
19 Sept 2024Final vote — text as a whole Situation in VenezuelaFinal309 for, 201 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.88 364 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksFinal355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 387 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroFinal374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 424 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 4 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment423 for, 232 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 472 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 469 voters
13 Nov 2025Referral back to committee Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural426 for, 202 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.85 443 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 429 voters
17 Sept 2026Recital F — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.84 408 voters
6 Jul 2026Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and DenmarkOther283 for, 142 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.84 291 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 22 — part 1, after paragraph 2 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176253, reference 2025/2542(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176253 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176253,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22 — part 1, after paragraph 2 — Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176253}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176253},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176253, reference 2025/2542(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}