Skip to content

Member

Monika HOHLMEIER

EPP · Germany

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
79.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
96.6 %ⓘ of 495 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
9 of 456 votesⓘ
Committees
BUDG (vice-chair), CONT
Member id
96780
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

79.8 %

495 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−10.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.6 %

478 of 495 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+1.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.0 %

9 of 456 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 6 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.8 %

9 of 495 votes cast

Participation 79.8 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Monika HOHLMEIER79.8 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 96.6 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Monika HOHLMEIER96.6 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 39, adding text after recital R 142 for, 420 against, 78 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 2, adding text after recital N 288 for, 273 against, 74 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 1, adding text after recital N 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 29, adding text after recital L 114 for, 450 against, 77 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital H 564 for, 52 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Recital E — part 3 of 3 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 86 — part 2 450 for, 183 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 227 for, 390 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 2 457 for, 179 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 1 601 for, 28 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 307 for, 293 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 322 for, 261 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 118 for, 429 against, 99 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 145 for, 439 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 2 444 for, 185 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 1 554 for, 40 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 225 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 223 for, 411 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 255 for, 361 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 224 for, 420 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 217 for, 419 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 219 for, 423 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 226 for, 414 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 224 for, 410 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 250 for, 391 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 3 554 for, 61 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 2 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 1 626 for, 20 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 61 464 for, 179 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 59 — part 2 448 for, 190 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 58 — part 2 456 for, 187 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 530 for, 78 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 54 440 for, 201 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 53 613 for, 24 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 46 — part 2 475 for, 152 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 254 for, 327 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 228 for, 413 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 261 for, 365 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 13 — part 2 475 for, 149 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 92 for, 521 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 8 — part 2 457 for, 178 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 362 for, 226 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 319 for, 295 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 2 497 for, 126 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 1 603 for, 29 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 183 for, 416 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 17 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany98 % of 3 113 shared89 %
Stefan KÖHLER EPPGermany97 % of 4 252 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany97 % of 3 608 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 3 933 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany97 % of 4 647 shared89 %
Norbert LINS EPPGermany97 % of 4 587 shared89 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany97 % of 4 164 shared89 %
Verena MERTENS EPPGermany97 % of 4 349 shared89 %
Ralf SEEKATZ EPPGermany97 % of 4 264 shared89 %
Marion WALSMANN EPPGermany97 % of 4 588 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia88 % of 4 181 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands86 % of 3 488 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania86 % of 4 108 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 099 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland86 % of 3 671 shared82 %
Jan-Christoph OETJEN RenewGermany86 % of 4 551 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany86 % of 3 324 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium86 % of 4 642 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany86 % of 4 615 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 669 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with CanadaD-CA DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on the PoliceIG10-18 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Sky and SpaceIG10-21 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Feb 2025now
Committee on BudgetsBUDG CommitteeMember19 Jul 202422 Jul 2024
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202418 May 2026

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European External Action ServiceShadow rapporteurCONT10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - European Public Prosecutors Office (the ‘EPPO’)Shadow rapporteurCONT10 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Court of AuditorsShadow rapporteurCONT10 Sept 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationCONT19 May 2026
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/009 BE/SoliverShadow rapporteurBUDG12 May 2026
Establishing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for the period 2028-2034 laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/695Shadow rapporteur for an opinionCONT15 Jan 2026
Establishing the Justice programme for the period 2028-2034 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/693Opinion rapporteurBUDG15 Jan 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activitiesShadow rapporteurBUDG12 Jan 2026
Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers following an application from Belgium – EGF/2025/006 BE/ AudiShadow rapporteurBUDG12 Jan 2026
Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instrumentsRapporteurCONT7 Nov 2025

Show all 20 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

18 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 42 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 18 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 10

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
13 May 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response B-10-2026-0245Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors—
25 Mar 2026Ensuring competition and strategic autonomy in the AI gigafactory supply chain E-10-2026-001255Written questionwith 17 co-authors19 Jun 2026
25 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the establishment of a European blacklist of ultra-violent extremist organisations (UVEOs) B-10-2026-0151Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026Strengthening Europe’s printed circuit boards & electronics production E-10-2026-000120Written questionwith 15 co-authors24 Mar 2026
5 Dec 2025Interference by Hamas in the activities of EU-funded non-governmental organisations E-10-2025-004832Written questionwith 14 co-authors31 Mar 2026
26 Feb 2025Organisations in the European Network Against Racism affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood E-10-2025-000869Written questionwith 1 co-author16 May 2025
21 Feb 2025Flood protection measures versus nature conservation E-10-2025-000813Written questionwith 15 co-authors29 Apr 2025
7 Nov 2024Documentation and Advice Centre on Islamophobia and Anti-Muslim Racism E-10-2024-002469Written questionwith 1 co-author13 Jan 2025
14 Oct 2024Scrutiny of EU funding for a university that promotes antisemitism E-10-2024-002065Written questionwith 11 co-authors7 Jan 2025
19 Sept 2024Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770Written questionwith 20 co-authors17 Dec 2024

Show all 10 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 79

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
30 Sept 2026General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections BUDG-AM-796264 BUDG13
27 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791874 CJ723
27 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790967 CJ722
27 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791072 CJ728
27 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791073 CJ7213
27 Jul 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791873 CJ7225
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130 JURI1
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129 JURI5
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128 JURI1
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131 JURI1

Show all 79 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Monika HOHLMEIER”. Member record. memberId 96780. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96780?page=76&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96780. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96780?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-96780,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Monika HOHLMEIER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96780?page=76&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96780?page=76&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96780. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96780. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}