Skip to content

Dossier · Own-initiative report

Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments

Reference
2025/2032(INI) Own-initiative report
Where it stands
Parliament adopted the text on 28 April 2026. This is its final position on the matter.
Stage
Parliament’s position
Lead committee
Budgetary Control CONT
More facts (5)
Author
Monika HOHLMEIER
Shadow rapporteurs
5 members
Decisions in plenary
1
Versions
3 versions

Where it stands

The steps of this kind of dossier and how far it has come, from the procedure file.

  1. Referred to committee (done) 13 February 2025
  2. Committee work (done) Report adopted 5 February 2026
  3. Tabled for plenary (done) 12 February 2026
  4. Plenary vote (done) Adopted 28 April 2026
  5. Parliament’s position (done) Final

Parliament sets out its own position on a topic. The resolution is not binding but signals what Parliament wants.

People

Committees and members responsible for the dossier, as the procedure file names them. Groups as recorded there.

Lead committee
Budgetary Control CONT
Author
Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP)

Decisions in plenary, 1

Every decision Parliament took on this dossier, newest first.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained, and how it was recorded.
DateDecisionKindEffectFinal vote
28 Apr 2026Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments ResolutionsAdopted527 for, 85 against, 33 abstained by roll call

Voting grid

Export

Every roll-call vote on the dossier, in date and voting order, with each group's line at the date of the vote.

Each group's clear line at the date of the vote: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided; “< 10 voted” when fewer took part. Result: outcome, for–against–abstained (method).

  1. Adopted 527–85–33

    The Left
    For
    Greens
    For
    S&D
    For
    Renew
    For
    EPP
    For
    ECR
    For
    Patriots
    Against
    ESN
    Against
Add members’ columns
The people on this dossier — pick up to 6. Each gets a column with their own position.

Versions, 3

The text of the dossier, version by version, newest first. Compare shows what changed between two consecutive versions.

  1. Adopted by Parliament28 Apr 2026

    Adopted text TA10-0122/2026 TA-10-2026-0122

    Compare with tabled for plenary

  2. Tabled for plenary12 Feb 2026

    Report A10-0022/2026 A-10-2026-0022

    Compare with committee draft

  3. Committee draft17 Nov 2025

    Draft report (CONT) CONT-PR-778127

AI: Each version in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source
  • Adopted text TA10-0122/2026: Parliament's resolution on performance-based instruments stresses that they must respect sound financial management and transparency, and calls for stronger control, transparency and traceability of EU funds.
  • Report A10-0022/2026: The report addresses control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments, focusing on the Recovery and Resilience Facility model. It calls for safeguards, better data systems, and stronger parliamentary oversight.
  • Draft report (CONT): This draft report on control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments sets out Parliament's concerns and recommendations. It warns against generalised use of financing not linked to costs and calls for stronger safeguards, transparency and parliamentary oversight.

Report a problem

What changed, 2

Between consecutive versions, newest pair first. The overviews are written by AI from the two texts; the comparison shows every change.

  1. Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament Report A10-0022/2026 → Adopted text TA10-0122/2026

    AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source

    The versions differ only in formal points: the decimal separator in a monetary amount is updated.

    Read the changes · Report a problem

    Compare the two versions

  2. Committee draft → Tabled for plenary Draft report (CONT) → Report A10-0022/2026

    AI: What changed Written by AI from the official text — check the source

    The report strengthens calls for risk-based controls, transparency, and safeguards in performance-based instruments, addressing weaknesses in the RRF model. It adds new concerns about debt, rule of law, and audit independence, and expands demands for public dashboards and AI tools. It clarifies that assessments must be done by the Commission and adds requirements for verifiable data and real-time access for authorities. It introduces a mechanism for recoveries when costs deviate and stresses the need for ex post evaluation and unified accountability. The other changes are formal: renumbering of paragraphs and minor wording adjustments.

    Read the changes · Report a problem

    Compare the two versions

Timeline, 6

Every recorded step, newest first, grouped by stage; the latest stage is open.

Plenary stage 2 steps · 12 Feb 2026–28 Apr 2026
  1. 28 April 2026

    Plenary vote

    Sitting of 28 Apr 2026 Report A10-0022/2026Adopted text TA10-0122/2026

  2. 12 February 2026

    Report tabled for plenary

    This is the text all MEPs vote on. Political groups can still table amendments to it.

    Report A10-0022/2026

Committee stage 4 steps · 13 Feb 2025–5 Feb 2026
  1. 5 February 2026

    Committee vote: report adopted

    CONT (Budgetary Control) voted on the amendments and adopted the report that goes to plenary.

  2. 16 December 2025

    Amendments tabled in committee

    Members of CONT (Budgetary Control) proposed changes to the draft.

    Amendments in committee (CONT)

  3. 17 November 2025

    Draft report published

    The rapporteur’s first text in CONT (Budgetary Control). Members can table amendments before the committee votes.

    Draft report (CONT)

  4. 13 February 2025

    Referred to the CONT (Budgetary Control) committee

    The lead committee prepares Parliament’s report.

Connections

Texts, decisions, people and other dossiers related to this one.

Texts voted on

Other dossiers of the same rapporteur

Dossiers sharing a running issue

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments”. Dossier, 28 April 2026. procId 2025-2032, reference 2025/2032(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2032 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Procedure file (Legislative Observatory, OEIL), https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025%2F2032(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/procedures/2025-2032 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-dossier-2025-2032,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2032}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/dossiers/2025-2032},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Dossier. procId 2025-2032, reference 2025/2032(INI). Official source: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025\%2F2032(INI). Data: EP Open Data API: procedure record (CC BY 4.0)}
}