Skip to content

Member · Former member

Bas EICKHOUT

Greens · Netherlands · left on 20 June 2026

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
88.9 %ⓘ of 548 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.8 %ⓘ of 487 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (4)
National party
GL-PvdA GroenLinks-PvdA
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 20 Jun 2026 (left on 20 June 2026)
Against clear line
0 of 475 votesⓘ
Member id
96725
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

88.9 %

487 of 548 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (−3.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.8 %

486 of 487 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (+3.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.0 %

0 of 475 votes where their group had a clear line

Abstention ⓘ

3.9 %

19 of 487 votes cast

Participation 88.9 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Bas EICKHOUT88.9 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 99.8 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Bas EICKHOUT99.8 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 283

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 147 to Article 1 527 for, 76 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 145 to Article 1 141 for, 498 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 141 to Article 1 177 for, 460 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 139 to Article 1 136 for, 489 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 138 to Article 1 160 for, 461 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Separate vote on Article 1 487 for, 134 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 137 to Article 1 158 for, 465 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 125 to Article 1 167 for, 446 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 144 to Article 1 114 for, 495 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 124 to Article 1 208 for, 382 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 135 to Article 1 213 for, 422 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 133 to Article 1 144 for, 476 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 132 to Article 1 170 for, 465 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Separate vote on Article 1 488 for, 143 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 131 to Article 1 189 for, 444 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 143 to Article 1 282 for, 360 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 148 to Article 1 305 for, 325 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 123 to Article 1 516 for, 81 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Final votePassed 492 for, 111 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendments 81 + 86 (voted as one) to Annex I 192 for, 411 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 85 to Annex I 146 for, 484 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 84 to Annex I 136 for, 493 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 87 to Article 1 189 for, 401 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 23 to Article 1 — part 4 381 for, 249 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 74 358 for, 264 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 73 367 for, 257 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 24 387 for, 227 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 21 390 for, 217 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Oct 2025Extension of the derogation for heavy-duty vehicles with zero emissions Final votePassed 458 for, 182 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Extension of the derogation for heavy-duty vehicles with zero emissions Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) 183 for, 445 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Oct 2025Role of EU policies in shaping the European Sport Model Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 552 for, 52 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Inland waterway transport: River Information Systems (RIS) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 636 for, 10 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Revision of the Visa Suspension Mechanism Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 518 for, 96 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
6 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Tuesday’s Agenda — Request by The Left Group 175 for, 239 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
6 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group Tuesday’s Agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group 196 for, 234 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 355 for, 173 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 7 83 for, 354 against, 110 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 86 for, 371 against, 120 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 89 for, 360 against, 120 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 95 for, 353 against, 130 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 305 for, 151 against, 122 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 26, adding text after recital H 179 for, 394 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Paragraph 35 — part 2 494 for, 71 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Paragraph 35 — part 1 582 for, 5 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 25 to paragraph 30 188 for, 397 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 26 82 for, 471 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 26 87 for, 466 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Separate vote on paragraph 25 347 for, 207 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 24 to paragraph 25 176 for, 403 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 17 to paragraph 24 316 for, 257 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 74 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany99 % of 4 355 shared94 %
Sara MATTHIEU GreensBelgium99 % of 4 028 shared94 %
Maria OHISALO GreensFinland99 % of 3 918 shared94 %
Ville NIINISTÖ GreensFinland99 % of 3 931 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany98 % of 4 456 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany98 % of 4 697 shared94 %
Hannah NEUMANN GreensGermany98 % of 4 358 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany98 % of 4 711 shared94 %
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN GreensGermany98 % of 4 507 shared94 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands98 % of 4 687 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance89 % of 3 784 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 048 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance88 % of 4 195 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 626 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands88 % of 4 732 shared83 %
Murielle LAURENT S&DFrance87 % of 4 291 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands87 % of 4 298 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance87 % of 3 455 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany87 % of 3 921 shared83 %
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN S&DFrance87 % of 4 603 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded; 23 on behalf of their group; 69 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
11 Feb 2026Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
9 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2026Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
17 Dec 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 4 minRead
27 Nov 2025Outcome of the UN Climate Change Conference - Belém (COP30) (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
13 Nov 2025Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
22 Oct 2025Preparation of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2025 (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 3 minRead
9 Oct 2025Request for waiver of immunity Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 28 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 12

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
17 Apr 2026Taxation of windfall profits in the energy sector O-10-2026-000019Oral questionwith 53 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 29 October 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 as regards technical provisions, long-term guarantee measures, own funds, equity risk, spread risk on securitisation positions, other standard formula capital requirements, reporting and disclosure, proportionality and group solvency B-10-2026-0056Motion for a resolution—
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
11 Dec 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 4 July 2025 amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 as regards the simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2021/2139 and (EU) 2023/2486 as regards simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives B-10-2025-0566Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
9 Dec 2025Committee for Socio-economic Analysis opinion delays and implications for the adoption of the EU-wide PFAS restriction E-10-2025-004861Written questionwith 9 co-authors16 Feb 2026
23 Oct 2025Sliding scale for steel (Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the proposed industrial decarbonisation accelerator act) E-10-2025-004184Written questionwith 18 co-authors19 Dec 2025
26 Sept 2025Energy dimension of the EU-US trade deal E-10-2025-003743Written questionwith 17 co-authors4 Dec 2025
8 Jul 2025PFAS limits and TFA in drinking water P-10-2025-002764Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors22 Aug 2025
6 Jun 2025Enabling a financial framework to support the circular economy in the EU E-10-2025-002292Written questionwith 16 co-authors18 Aug 2025
5 Jun 2025Protecting retail investors against predatory investment firms selling misleading financial products offering poor value for money E-10-2025-002287Written question31 Jul 2025

Show all 12 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 4

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
11 Nov 2025European Central Bank – annual report 2025 ECON-AM-779370 ECON46
20 May 2025Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements ECON-AM-773048 ECON63
11 Dec 20242023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Commission ENVI-AM-766861 ENVI1
13 Nov 2024European Central Bank – annual report 2024 ECON-AM-765337 ECON34

Show all 4 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Bas EICKHOUT”. Member record. memberId 96725. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?page=60&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96725. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96725?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-96725,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Bas EICKHOUT}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?page=60&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96725?page=60&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96725. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96725. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}