Skip to content

Member

Pascal CANFIN

Renew · France

Group
Renew
Country
France
Roll-call participation
92.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
94.0 %ⓘ of 568 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 93.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
Ren Renaissance
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
8 of 523 votesⓘ
Committees
ECON (substitute), ENVI, INTA, JURI (substitute)
Member id
96711
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.3 %

572 of 620 final votes while in office

Renew median: 91.5 % (+0.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.0 %

534 of 568 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 93.6 % (+0.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.5 %

8 of 523 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 5 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.9 %

11 of 572 votes cast

Participation 92.3 % — Renew median 91.5 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Pascal CANFIN92.3 %
Renew median91.5 %
Lowest in the group64.4 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members76
With majority line 94.0 % — Renew median 93.6 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Pascal CANFIN94.0 %
Renew median93.6 %
Lowest in the group79.8 %
Highest in the group97.6 %
Members76
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 24, adding text after recital 13 162 for, 424 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 3 to recital 11 257 for, 292 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 23, adding text after recital 8 170 for, 412 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 22, adding text after recital 5 164 for, 425 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 29 to Article 11 353 for, 254 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 28, adding text after Article 3 175 for, 399 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 20 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point j 142 for, 434 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 19 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point vii 110 for, 432 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 18 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point iii 119 for, 436 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 17 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point d 86 for, 479 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 16 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point b 154 for, 421 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 27 to Article 3, paragraph 1, after point a 175 for, 408 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1 322 for, 255 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3 362 for, 235 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2 346 for, 254 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 15 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a 161 for, 430 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 14 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a 160 for, 433 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1 345 for, 237 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 13 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a 119 for, 434 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 12 to Article 2, after point 4 158 for, 433 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4 120 for, 433 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 10 to Article 2, after point 4 161 for, 433 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2 369 for, 236 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2 114 for, 422 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 8 to Article 1, paragraph 1 117 for, 422 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text 314 for, 276 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026Establishment of the digital euro Decision to open negotiations with the CouncilNegotiating mandate approved 416 for, 169 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9 Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 417 for, 167 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 575 for, 33 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 466 for, 175 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital J 337 for, 273 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 6 to recital J 292 for, 348 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 5, adding text after recital I 274 for, 323 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 4, adding text after recital I 383 for, 239 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 2, adding text after recital C 374 for, 233 against, 45 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital B 625 for, 7 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 22 196 for, 423 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 19 358 for, 166 against, 122 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 348 for, 282 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 489 for, 142 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 3 488 for, 68 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 2 484 for, 78 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 1 453 for, 141 against, 45 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5 234 for, 367 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on paragraph 5 615 for, 33 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2 243 for, 384 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 2 567 for, 41 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 1 628 for, 18 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1 194 for, 445 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Fabienne KELLER RenewFrance98 % of 5 201 shared92 %
Valérie DEVAUX RenewFrance98 % of 4 842 shared92 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance98 % of 5 131 shared92 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance98 % of 4 664 shared92 %
Sandro GOZI RenewFrance98 % of 4 783 shared92 %
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former memberRenewFrance97 % of 2 280 shared92 %
Nathalie LOISEAU RenewFrance97 % of 4 165 shared92 %
Grégory ALLIONE RenewFrance97 % of 4 687 shared92 %
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN RenewFrance97 % of 4 574 shared92 %
Christophe GRUDLER RenewFrance97 % of 4 906 shared92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain90 % of 5 028 shared86 %
Dan NICA S&DRomania90 % of 3 391 shared86 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal90 % of 4 977 shared86 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal90 % of 4 819 shared86 %
Sérgio GONÇALVES S&DPortugal90 % of 5 195 shared86 %
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ S&DLithuania90 % of 5 078 shared86 %
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany90 % of 4 311 shared86 %
Sven MIKSER S&DEstonia90 % of 5 248 shared86 %
Marta TEMIDO S&DPortugal90 % of 4 801 shared86 %
Nicolás GONZÁLEZ CASARES S&DSpain90 % of 4 612 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember20 Jan 2025now
Committee on International TradeINTA CommitteeMember10 Mar 2026now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeSubstitute25 Mar 2026now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC SubcommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the Federative Republic of BrazilD-BR DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Attracting Investment to Ensure a Competitive and Sustainable European UnionIG10-03 Intergroup / working groupChair co31 Jan 2025now

Show all 15 seats

Dossiers

Show all 27 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

23 contributions recorded; 6 on behalf of their group; 31 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 23 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 8

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
17 Apr 2026Taxation of windfall profits in the energy sector O-10-2026-000019Oral questionwith 53 co-authorsNot yet answered
13 Mar 2026Persistent imports of Russian aluminium and other strategic commodities into the EU E-10-2026-001061Written questionwith 6 co-authors29 Apr 2026
3 Mar 2026Protection of EU officials and civil society against risks of privacy violations and foreign sanctions in relation to the implementation of the Digital Services Act E-10-2026-000880Written questionwith 23 co-authors20 May 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors—
30 Sept 2025Support for EU battery producers E-10-2025-003795Written questionwith 11 co-authors17 Apr 2026
1 Jul 2025European cardiovascular health plan E-10-2025-002661Written questionwith 2 co-authors11 Sept 2025
30 Jun 2025Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act in the context of EU-US trade negotiations P-10-2025-002647Priority written questionwith 24 co-authors29 Jul 2025

Show all 8 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 86

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131 JURI12
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130 JURI16
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129 JURI5
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128 JURI5
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916 AGRI3
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955 AGRI5
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790917 AGRI4
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956 AGRI7
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915 AGRI2
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958 AGRI1

Show all 86 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

  • Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

  • Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Pascal CANFIN”. Member record. memberId 96711. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96711?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96711. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96711?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-96711,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Pascal CANFIN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96711?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96711?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96711. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96711. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}