Skip to content

Member

Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ

S&D · Lithuania

Group
S&D
Country
Lithuania
Roll-call participation
95.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
99.2 %ⓘ of 591 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
LSDP Lietuvos socialdemokratų partija
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
3 of 584 votesⓘ
Committees
EMPL, FEMM (substitute)
Member id
96681
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.3 %

591 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+5.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

99.2 %

586 of 591 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+2.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.5 %

3 of 584 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.5 %

3 of 591 votes cast

Participation 95.3 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ95.3 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 99.2 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ99.2 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 7, adding text after recital A 118 for, 405 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 164 for, 418 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 9 150 for, 423 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 171 for, 428 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 6 283 for, 262 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Separate vote on paragraph 6 450 for, 63 against, 96 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 97 for, 436 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 123 for, 378 against, 105 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 162 for, 425 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 161 for, 428 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) Act Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 3 72 for, 476 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 528 for, 21 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Amendment 1, adding text after recital Z 277 for, 246 against, 90 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Paragraph 18 — part 1 444 for, 153 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Amendment 3 to paragraph 17 217 for, 306 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Amendment 2 to paragraph 16 247 for, 334 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies Paragraph 8 — part 2 455 for, 147 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 460 for, 71 against, 88 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Amendment 1, adding text after recital H 174 for, 410 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges Amendment 2 to paragraph 3 159 for, 426 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 602 for, 9 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 6, adding text after recital E 181 for, 426 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 5, adding text after recital E 182 for, 422 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 4, adding text after recital E 186 for, 423 against, 0 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 3, adding text after recital E 182 for, 425 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 2, adding text after recital E 180 for, 419 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 183 for, 421 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 176 for, 431 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 178 for, 435 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 181 for, 421 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 182 for, 415 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 27 173 for, 433 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 170 for, 426 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 181 for, 417 against, 0 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 173 for, 426 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 367 for, 166 against, 84 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 23, adding text after recital S 132 for, 472 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital R — part 3 457 for, 138 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital R — part 2 441 for, 148 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital R — part 1 562 for, 34 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 92, adding text after recital O 170 for, 441 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital O — part 2 478 for, 116 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital O — part 1 539 for, 77 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 62 to recital O 132 for, 472 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital N — part 2 443 for, 161 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital J — part 2 422 for, 172 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Recital J — part 1 573 for, 43 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 90, adding text after recital H 178 for, 430 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 7, adding text after recital F 106 for, 511 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 88, adding text after recital D 193 for, 412 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain99 % of 5 185 shared93 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal98 % of 5 128 shared93 %
Isilda GOMES S&DPortugal98 % of 4 936 shared93 %
Sérgio GONÇALVES S&DPortugal98 % of 5 443 shared93 %
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES S&DPortugal98 % of 4 739 shared93 %
Camilla LAURETI S&DItaly98 % of 5 452 shared93 %
Marta TEMIDO S&DPortugal98 % of 5 077 shared93 %
Francisco ASSIS S&DPortugal98 % of 4 499 shared93 %
Ana Catarina MENDES S&DPortugal98 % of 5 036 shared93 %
Robert BIEDROŃ S&DPoland98 % of 5 563 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly91 % of 1 763 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium90 % of 4 082 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia90 % of 4 946 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania90 % of 5 185 shared86 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia90 % of 5 215 shared86 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance90 % of 4 910 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia90 % of 4 787 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance90 % of 5 312 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands90 % of 5 499 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg90 % of 5 222 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapShadow rapporteurEMPL18 Mar 2025
Budget 2025Shadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL3 Sept 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

44 contributions recorded, 16 written statements; 1 on behalf of their group; 34 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 15

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0309Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
9 Mar 2026Protection of workers exposed to formaldehyde in the EU E-10-2026-000967Written questionwith 21 co-authors27 Apr 2026
5 Mar 2026Clarification on Child Guarantee funding: detailed disbursements per Member State E-10-2026-000933Written questionwith 5 co-authors4 Jun 2026
19 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania B-10-2026-0078Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
12 Jan 2026The place of child poverty in the upcoming EU Anti-Poverty Strategy E-10-2026-000058Written questionwith 5 co-authors12 Feb 2026
15 Dec 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania B-10-2025-0587Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—
18 Jul 2025Review of the EU school fruit, vegetables and milk scheme in the context of the European Child Guarantee E-10-2025-003007Written questionwith 5 co-authors29 Aug 2025
1 Apr 2025Withdrawal of the Horizontal Anti-Discrimination Directive P-10-2025-001330Priority written questionwith 40 co-authors21 May 2025
18 Mar 2025Withdrawal of the proposed horizontal anti-discrimination directive P-10-2025-001148Priority written questionwith 46 co-authors24 Jul 2025
28 Feb 2025Action plan on rare diseases E-10-2025-000886Written questionwith 33 co-authors26 Jun 2025

Show all 15 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 48

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
2 Sept 2026Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States EMPL-AM-792013 EMPL35
13 Jul 2026General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections EMPL-AM-789962 EMPL15
22 Jun 2026Boosting skills in the Union – opportunities for vocational education and training in times of transition EMPL-AM-790034 EMPL21
22 May 2026Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1238 on a pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) EMPL-AM-788963 EMPL42
19 May 2026Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 EMPL-AM-788901 EMPL43
12 May 2026Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRPPlan] establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to quality employment, skills and social inclusion for the period from 2028 to 2034 EMPL-AM-788860 EMPL4
23 Apr 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation of 30 October 2020 on A Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee and replacing the Council Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guarantee EMPL-AM-787792 EMPL59
23 Apr 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation of 30 October 2020 on A Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee and replacing the Council Recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guarantee EMPL-AM-787791 EMPL17
21 Apr 2026Psychosocial risks, stress and mental health at work EMPL-AM-787743 EMPL17
21 Apr 2026Psychosocial risks, stress and mental health at work EMPL-AM-787726 EMPL8

Show all 48 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ”. Member record. memberId 96681. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96681?page=38&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96681. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96681?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-96681,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96681?page=38&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96681?page=38&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96681. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96681. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}