Skip to content

Member

Marit MAIJ

S&D · Netherlands

Group
S&D
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
99.5 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
92.7 %ⓘ of 617 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
PRO Progressief Nederland
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
41 of 610 votesⓘ
Committees
CONT, DEVE (substitute), EMPL
Member id
91636
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.5 %

617 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+10.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.7 %

572 of 617 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−4.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.7 %

41 of 610 votes where their group had a clear line

19 opposite (for ↔ against), 21 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.9 %

24 of 617 votes cast

Participation 99.5 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Marit MAIJ99.5 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 92.7 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Marit MAIJ92.7 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 209 for, 434 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 421 for, 180 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 13 to recital P 198 for, 444 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 199 for, 438 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report Amendment 2 174 for, 446 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Recital G — part 2 418 for, 200 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Recital E — part 2 420 for, 224 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 10 to recital E 199 for, 441 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 9, adding text after recital A 150 for, 445 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 38 to paragraph 82 154 for, 450 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Separate vote on paragraph 81 642 for, 6 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 66 173 for, 446 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 36 to paragraph 59 187 for, 450 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 55 159 for, 438 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Separate vote on paragraph 52 575 for, 9 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 47 152 for, 454 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 45 159 for, 447 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 31 to paragraph 44 152 for, 450 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 41 76 for, 488 against, 89 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 150 for, 452 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35 199 for, 446 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 26 to paragraph 34 159 for, 445 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 184 for, 454 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 22 to paragraph 24 175 for, 433 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 5 to paragraph 21 189 for, 442 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 19 to paragraph 20 152 for, 444 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 19 206 for, 432 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 19 188 for, 437 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 4 402 for, 238 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 3 404 for, 235 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 19 — part 2 430 for, 218 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 3 to paragraph 18 145 for, 447 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 188 for, 457 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Paragraph 7 — part 2 467 for, 126 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 15 to paragraph 7 114 for, 458 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 124 for, 452 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2025EU/Euratom Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty: adoption by Euratom Final votePassed 557 for, 47 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Adoption by the Union of the Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty Final votePassed 554 for, 53 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 386 for, 132 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Final vote — text as a wholeRejected 282 for, 340 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 69 291 for, 356 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Paragraph 67 — part 2 321 for, 272 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Paragraph 67 — part 1 585 for, 43 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Paragraph 66 — part 2 327 for, 250 against, 81 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Paragraph 66 — part 1 591 for, 46 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 64 300 for, 339 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 55 289 for, 347 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 53 312 for, 295 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 44 280 for, 322 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jun 2025Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville Separate vote on paragraph 43 361 for, 244 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands99 % of 5 748 shared93 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands99 % of 5 389 shared93 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands97 % of 5 174 shared93 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany96 % of 5 005 shared93 %
Gabriele BISCHOFF S&DGermany96 % of 5 682 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany96 % of 4 235 shared93 %
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany95 % of 4 643 shared93 %
Bruno TOBBACK S&DBelgium95 % of 5 615 shared93 %
René REPASI S&DGermany95 % of 5 539 shared93 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain95 % of 5 440 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands89 % of 5 459 shared83 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands89 % of 5 455 shared83 %
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia89 % of 5 539 shared86 %
Tineke STRIK GreensNetherlands88 % of 5 539 shared83 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium88 % of 4 205 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands88 % of 5 823 shared86 %
Lukas SIEPER changed group RenewGermany88 % of 5 463 shared49 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia88 % of 5 847 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands88 % of 5 891 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia88 % of 5 369 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT CommitteeMember9 Oct 2024now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the Cariforum-EU Parliamentary CommitteeDCAR Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupMember16 Jan 2025now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEMPL14 Sept 2026
EU Gender Action Plan IV – priorities for gender equality and women’s rights in external actionShadow rapporteurDEVE8 Sept 2026
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - AgenciesShadow rapporteurCONT20 Aug 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurEMPL18 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegation · 2 declarationsDEVE18 May 2026
Africa - EU Interparliamentary Assembly in EswatiniOfficial delegationDAFR5 May 2026
FIRST ORDINARY PLENARY AFRICA-EU PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLYOfficial delegationDAFR29 Mar 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1252Opinion rapporteurDEVE3 Mar 2026
Amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the otherShadow rapporteurDEVE2 Feb 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEMPL21 Jan 2026

Show all 35 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

75 contributions recorded; 13 on behalf of their group; 97 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 39

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
16 Jul 2026EU response to United Arab Emirates’ support to the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan E-10-2026-003026Written questionwith 3 co-authors18 Aug 2026
8 Jul 2026European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822Written questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0359Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
30 Jun 2026Follow-up to question for written answer E-001083/2025 on menstrual products: transparency and health risks E-10-2026-002698Written questionwith 43 co-authors18 Sept 2026
18 Jun 2026Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532Written questionwith 27 co-authors6 Aug 2026
12 Mar 2026Situation in Sudan E-10-2026-001036Written questionwith 13 co-authors30 Apr 2026
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular Africans, for Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0166Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
27 Jan 2026Important and special situation of the overseas countries and territories, including Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao E-10-2026-000313Written questionwith 1 co-author26 Mar 2026

Show all 39 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 78

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 78 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marit MAIJ”. Member record. memberId 91636. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/91636?page=85&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/91636. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/91636?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-91636,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marit MAIJ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/91636?page=85&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/91636?page=85&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 91636. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/91636. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}