Decision
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group
- Effect
- Rejected
- Result
- 124 for · 281 against · 16 abstained roll call
- Date
- 20 October 2025, 18:12
- Kind
- Agenda vote
More facts (4)
- Margin
- by a large majority
- Votes
- 1 vote · 1 roll call
- Sitting
- Monday 20 October 2025
- Final vote
- 179910
Result
The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.
Final vote: 124 for, 281 against, 16 abstained (roll call).
Rejected by a large majority.
The agenda was left unchanged.
Backed by ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP.
Groups
| Group | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Majority line | Clear line | Cohesion | Bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | For 0 | Against 20 | Abst. 2 | No vote 24 of 46 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.86 | |
| Greens | For 0 | Against 42 | Abst. 1 | No vote 10 of 53 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.97 | |
| S&D | For 0 | Against 82 | Abst. 0 | No vote 54 of 136 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| Renew | For 0 | Against 42 | Abst. 2 | No vote 31 of 75 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.93 | |
| EPP | For 11 | Against 90 | Abst. 6 | No vote 81 of 188 | Majority line Against | Clear line Against | Cohesion 0.76 | |
| ECR | For 36 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 43 of 79 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| Patriots | For 57 | Against 0 | Abst. 0 | No vote 28 of 85 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 1.00 | |
| ESN | For 13 | Against 0 | Abst. 1 | No vote 13 of 27 | Majority line For | Clear line For | Cohesion 0.89 | |
| No group | For 7 | Against 5 | Abst. 4 | No vote 14 of 30 | Majority line — | Clear line No line | Cohesion — |
Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.
Voted against their group, 23
Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.
The Left line Against · 2 abstained of 22 who voted
Abstained (2)
- Arash SAEIDI France
- Dario TAMBURRANO Italy
Greens line Against · 1 abstained of 43 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Nela RIEHL Germany
Renew line Against · 2 abstained of 44 who voted
Abstained (2)
- Asger CHRISTENSEN Denmark
- Morten LØKKEGAARD Denmark
EPP line Against · 11 voted for, 6 abstained of 107 who voted
Voted for (11)
- Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE Sweden
- Branko GRIMS Slovenia
- Christophe GOMART France
- Ewa KOPACZ Poland
- Jessika VAN LEEUWEN Netherlands
- Laurent CASTILLO France
- Milan ZVER Slovenia
- Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA Romania
- Romana TOMC Slovenia
- Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ Slovenia
- Željana ZOVKO Croatia
Abstained (6)
- Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI Poland
- Danuše NERUDOVÁ Czechia
- Isabelle LE CALLENNEC France
- Iuliu WINKLER Romania
- Mika AALTOLA Finland
- Sander SMIT Netherlands
ESN line For · 1 abstained of 14 who voted
Abstained (1)
- Volker SCHNURRBUSCH Germany
Countries
The final vote by national delegation.
Votes by country (27 delegations)
| Country | For | Against | Abst. | No vote | Cohesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 4 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0.57 |
| Belgium | 5 | 11 | 0 | 6 | 0.53 |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 6 | 0 | 10 | — |
| Cyprus | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | — |
| Czechia | 8 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 0.42 |
| Germany | 14 | 52 | 4 | 26 | 0.61 |
| Denmark | 1 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0.65 |
| Estonia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | — |
| Spain | 1 | 22 | 0 | 37 | 0.93 |
| Finland | 0 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 0.85 |
| France | 28 | 24 | 2 | 27 | 0.28 |
| Greece | 1 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 0.89 |
| Croatia | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | — |
| Hungary | 8 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 0.59 |
| Ireland | 0 | 4 | 0 | 10 | — |
| Italy | 13 | 21 | 1 | 41 | 0.40 |
| Lithuania | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | — |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Latvia | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | — |
| Malta | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | — |
| Netherlands | 7 | 15 | 1 | 8 | 0.48 |
| Poland | 16 | 15 | 2 | 20 | 0.23 |
| Portugal | 2 | 7 | 0 | 12 | — |
| Romania | 4 | 9 | 1 | 19 | 0.46 |
| Sweden | 3 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0.75 |
| Slovenia | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Slovakia | 0 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 0.85 |
Members
Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.
All votes on this decision, 1
| No. | Vote | Recorded | Result | Requested by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group | Roll call | 124 for, 281 against, 16 abstained Rejected |
Text
The text voted on.
Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.
Connections
What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.
Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way
Final votes that split the chamber the same way
- Decision Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential Objection to a Commission measure · motion for a resolution 26 Mar 2026 Objection failed
- Decision Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuels Resolution · motion for a resolution 23 Oct 2025 Objection failed
- Decision Motion of censure on the Commission Resolution · motion for a resolution 9 Oct 2025 Rejected
- Decision Motion of censure on the Commission Resolution · motion for a resolution 10 Jul 2025 Rejected
- Decision Amending the Directive on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes New EU law · report by Laura Ballarín Cereza 16 Dec 2025 Amendment 1 rejected
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official sources
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group”. Decision, 20 October 2025. votingId 179910. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-20/2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-20/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-10-20-2,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-10-20},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-20/2}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-20/2},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Decision. votingId 179910. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}