Member

Younous OMARJEE

The Left · France

Group: The Left
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 72.9 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 92.6 %ⓘ of 4 309 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 92.8 %

More facts (5)

National party: LFI La France Insoumise
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 154 of 4 013 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG, CONT (substitute), REGI
Member id: 30482

National party: LFI La France Insoumise
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 154 of 4 013 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG, CONT (substitute), REGI
Member id: 30482

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

72.9 %

4 319 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

The Left median: 88.5 % (−15.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.6 %

3 991 of 4 309 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 92.8 % (−0.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.8 %

154 of 4 013 votes where their group had a clear line

111 opposite (for ↔ against), 24 abstained against the line, 19 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.5 %

150 of 4 319 votes cast

Participation 72.9 % — The Left median 88.5 %, 47 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Younous OMARJEE	72.9 %
The Left median	88.5 %
Lowest in the group	44.2 %
Highest in the group	99.3 %
Members	47

With majority line 92.6 % — The Left median 92.8 %, 47 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Younous OMARJEE	92.6 %
The Left median	92.8 %
Lowest in the group	81.9 %
Highest in the group	96.9 %
Members	47

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 22 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	22
18 Jul 2024	1	0
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	91
7 Oct 2024	2	0
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	0
23 Oct 2024	129	128
24 Oct 2024	13	0
13 Nov 2024	2	1
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	1
26 Nov 2024	18	14
27 Nov 2024	11	10
28 Nov 2024	57	37
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	44
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	0
11 Feb 2025	32	31
12 Feb 2025	10	0
13 Feb 2025	30	0
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	0
13 Mar 2025	24	22
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	4
2 Apr 2025	251	241
3 Apr 2025	62	61
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	0
7 May 2025	220	136
8 May 2025	103	101
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	40
18 Jun 2025	91	89
19 Jun 2025	87	85
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	130
10 Jul 2025	36	1
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	100
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	0
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	54
9 Oct 2025	65	60
20 Oct 2025	3	2
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	170
23 Oct 2025	55	0
13 Nov 2025	267	0
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	0
26 Nov 2025	100	0
27 Nov 2025	125	0
15 Dec 2025	4	3
16 Dec 2025	66	64
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	42
20 Jan 2026	67	0
21 Jan 2026	112	111
22 Jan 2026	58	57
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	37
11 Feb 2026	13	12
12 Feb 2026	141	139
24 Feb 2026	43	39
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	191
11 Mar 2026	60	58
12 Mar 2026	34	33
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	0
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	219
29 Apr 2026	296	294
30 Apr 2026	68	0
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	93
21 May 2026	98	0
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	38
17 Jun 2026	127	118
18 Jun 2026	77	72
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	140
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	145
16 Sept 2026	80	77
17 Sept 2026	124	115

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Marina MESURE	Marina MESURE	The Left	France	95 % of 4 209 shared	87 %
Select Leila CHAIBI	Leila CHAIBI	The Left	France	95 % of 4 164 shared	87 %
Select Anthony SMITH	Anthony SMITH	The Left	France	95 % of 3 881 shared	87 %
Select Emma FOURREAU	Emma FOURREAU	The Left	France	95 % of 3 869 shared	87 %
Select Arash SAEIDI	Arash SAEIDI	The Left	France	95 % of 3 191 shared	87 %
Select Rima HASSAN	Rima HASSAN	The Left	France	95 % of 3 379 shared	87 %
Select Manon AUBRY	Manon AUBRY	The Left	France	95 % of 4 155 shared	87 %
Select Damien CARÊME	Damien CARÊME	The Left	France	95 % of 3 439 shared	87 %
Select Mimmo LUCANO	Mimmo LUCANO	The Left	Italy	92 % of 2 217 shared	87 %
Select Ilaria SALIS	Ilaria SALIS	The Left	Italy	92 % of 3 704 shared	87 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	Greens	France	88 % of 4 168 shared	77 %
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Greens	Spain	88 % of 3 898 shared	77 %
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	Greens	France	87 % of 3 588 shared	77 %
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Greens	Italy	87 % of 3 606 shared	77 %
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Greens	Italy	87 % of 4 135 shared	77 %
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Greens	Belgium	87 % of 3 977 shared	77 %
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Greens	Spain	87 % of 3 711 shared	77 %
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	Greens	France	87 % of 3 990 shared	77 %
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Greens	Spain	87 % of 3 655 shared	77 %
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Greens	Italy	86 % of 3 784 shared	77 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on BudgetsBUDG Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Budgetary ControlCONT Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with IndiaD-IN Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working group	Member	11 Mar 2025	now
Intergroup on the Welfare and Conservation of AnimalsIG10-27 Intergroup / working group	Member	8 Jan 2025	now

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Discharge 2025: General budget of the EU - Joint Undertakings	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	9 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Rapporteur	REGI	26 Aug 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	REGI	8 Jul 2026
Amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	1 Apr 2026
Establishing a budget expenditure tracking and performance framework and other horizontal rules for the Union programmes and activities	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	10 Mar 2026
EP delegation to the Conciliation Committee on Air Passenger Rights 2013/0072(COD)	Trilogue negotiator		5 Feb 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	CONT	26 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	CONT	14 Jan 2026
Laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	CONT	14 Jan 2026
EP mission to the 7th AU-EU SUMMIT in Luanda, 24-25 Nov	Official delegation		21 Nov 2025
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - Joint Undertakings	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	18 Nov 2025
EP ad hoc mission to PAP headquarters in Midrand, 14-15 Nov	Official delegation		13 Nov 2025
Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Spain regarding the floods in the Valencia Region of Spain in October 2024 and France following the damages caused by cyclone Chido in Mayotte in December 2024 and cyclone Garance in Réunion in February 2025	Shadow rapporteur	BUDG	7 Oct 2025
Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	13 May 2025
A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	CONT	2 Dec 2024
Possibilities for simplification of cohesion funds	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	CONT	2 Dec 2024
RESTORE - Regional Emergency Support to Reconstruction	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	15 Nov 2024
RESTORE - Regional Emergency Support to Reconstruction	Rapporteur	REGI	15 Nov 2024
Amendment of the EIB's Statute	Shadow rapporteur	BUDG	15 Oct 2024
Annual report on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (EIB)	Shadow rapporteur	BUDG	9 Oct 2024
2024/2031(DEC) 2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Joint Undertakings	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	7 Oct 2024
Establishing the Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism and providing exceptional macro-financial assistance to Ukraine	Shadow rapporteur	BUDG	3 Oct 2024
Discharge - Joint Undertakings	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	9 Sept 2024
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	BUDG	3 Sept 2024
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	3 Sept 2024
Discharge procedure : EIB Report	Shadow rapporteur	CONT	3 Sept 2024
No dossier named	Vice-President		11 Jul 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

299 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 157 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech	Read
16 Sept 2026	The impact of the implementation of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) on SMEs, its administrative burden and challenges for the European Single Market (debate)	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	Funeral for war criminal Ratko Mladić and glorification of war crimes in Serbia (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate)	Speech	Read
15 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid (JOIN(2026)0025) (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid (JOIN(2026)0025) (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Composition of political groups	Speech	Read
18 Jun 2026	Adjournment of the session	Speech	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 21

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
7 Sept 2026	Climate change, public health and the world of work: for a directive on maximum working temperatures O-10-2026-000035	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
12 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba B-10-2026-0289	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
4 May 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the universalisation of company law: ‘towards a new El Dorado for businesses’ B-10-2026-0237	Motion for a resolutionwith 8 co-authors	—
1 Apr 2026	Guaranteeing affordable energy prices in view of the conflict in Iran and the limitations of the European electricity market E-10-2026-001360	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	26 Jun 2026
24 Mar 2026	Israel’s use of chemical weapons in Lebanon and Syria E-10-2026-001225	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	22 May 2026
9 Mar 2026	Public procurement and deaths at work: choosing the best bidder in social terms and making social rights and safety at work a condition for access to contracts O-10-2026-000011	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
22 Jan 2026	President Trump’s threats to invade Greenland: EU-US trade agreement broken E-10-2026-000251	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	18 Mar 2026
14 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0060	Motion for a resolutionwith 143 co-authors	—
5 Nov 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore B-10-2025-0479	Motion for a resolutionwith 75 co-authors	—

Show all 21 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 39

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
7 Sept 2026	Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058	REGI	1
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790102	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790090	CJ71	2
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790092	CJ71	7
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790093	CJ71	8
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094	CJ71	6
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790097	CJ71	10
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790098	CJ71	7
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790099	CJ71	9
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790100	CJ71	3

Show all 39 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) The Left · Left · democratic socialism, communism

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/30482?roles=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Younous OMARJEE”. Member record. memberId 30482. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/30482?roles=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/30482. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/30482?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-30482,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Younous OMARJEE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/30482?roles=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/30482?roles=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 30482. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/30482. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within The Left

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 21

Amendments tabled in committee, 39

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928