Skip to content

Member

Marko VEŠLIGAJ

S&D · Croatia

Group
S&D
Country
Croatia
Roll-call participation
76.7 %ⓘ of 619 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
96.6 %ⓘ of 475 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
SDP Socijaldemokratska partija Hrvatske
In office
Since 5 Sept 2024
Against clear line
13 of 471 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI (substitute), FEMM (vice-chair), REGI (substitute)
Member id
260035
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

76.7 %

475 of 619 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (−12.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.6 %

459 of 475 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−0.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.8 %

13 of 471 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 10 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

2.7 %

13 of 475 votes cast

Participation 76.7 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Marko VEŠLIGAJ76.7 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 96.6 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Marko VEŠLIGAJ96.6 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 904

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Separate vote on Article 1 487 for, 134 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 137 to Article 1 158 for, 465 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 125 to Article 1 167 for, 446 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 144 to Article 1 114 for, 495 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 124 to Article 1 208 for, 382 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 135 to Article 1 213 for, 422 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 133 to Article 1 144 for, 476 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 132 to Article 1 170 for, 465 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Separate vote on Article 1 488 for, 143 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 131 to Article 1 189 for, 444 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 143 to Article 1 282 for, 360 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 148 to Article 1 305 for, 325 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain Amendment 123 to Article 1 516 for, 81 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Final votePassed 492 for, 111 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendments 81 + 86 (voted as one) to Annex I 192 for, 411 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 85 to Annex I 146 for, 484 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 84 to Annex I 136 for, 493 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 87 to Article 1 189 for, 401 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 23 to Article 1 — part 4 381 for, 249 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 74 358 for, 264 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 73 367 for, 257 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 24 387 for, 227 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
8 Oct 2025Amending certain CAP regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties Amendment 21 390 for, 217 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Oct 2025Extension of the derogation for heavy-duty vehicles with zero emissions Final votePassed 458 for, 182 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Extension of the derogation for heavy-duty vehicles with zero emissions Amendments 1 + 2 (voted as one) 183 for, 445 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Oct 2025Role of EU policies in shaping the European Sport Model Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 552 for, 52 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Inland waterway transport: River Information Systems (RIS) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 636 for, 10 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Oct 2025Revision of the Visa Suspension Mechanism Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 518 for, 96 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
6 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Tuesday’s Agenda — Request by The Left Group 175 for, 239 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
6 Oct 2025Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group Tuesday’s Agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group 196 for, 234 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 355 for, 173 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 7 83 for, 354 against, 110 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 86 for, 371 against, 120 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 89 for, 360 against, 120 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
11 Sept 2025Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 95 for, 353 against, 130 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 305 for, 151 against, 122 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 26, adding text after recital H 179 for, 394 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Paragraph 35 — part 2 494 for, 71 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Paragraph 35 — part 1 582 for, 5 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 25 to paragraph 30 188 for, 397 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 26 82 for, 471 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 26 87 for, 466 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Separate vote on paragraph 25 347 for, 207 against, 39 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 24 to paragraph 25 176 for, 403 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 17 to paragraph 24 316 for, 257 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 13 to paragraph 20 312 for, 270 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Separate vote on paragraph 19 540 for, 6 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 301 for, 249 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 10 105 for, 456 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
11 Sept 2025Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution Amendment 8 to paragraph 9 290 for, 271 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 14 of 79 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Biljana BORZAN S&DCroatia97 % of 4 385 shared93 %
Romana JERKOVIĆ S&DCroatia97 % of 3 491 shared93 %
Tonino PICULA S&DCroatia95 % of 4 450 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain92 % of 3 025 shared93 %
Alicia HOMS GINEL S&DSpain91 % of 3 759 shared93 %
José CEPEDA S&DSpain91 % of 3 870 shared93 %
Lina GÁLVEZ S&DSpain91 % of 3 883 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany90 % of 3 483 shared93 %
Irene TINAGLI S&DItaly90 % of 4 431 shared93 %
Sandro RUOTOLO S&DItaly90 % of 3 336 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Vladimir PREBILIČ GreensSlovenia85 % of 3 865 shared83 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands85 % of 4 283 shared83 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany84 % of 4 169 shared83 %
Sergey LAGODINSKY GreensGermany84 % of 3 435 shared83 %
Irena JOVEVA RenewSlovenia84 % of 4 304 shared86 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany84 % of 4 215 shared83 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands84 % of 4 283 shared83 %
Jutta PAULUS GreensGermany84 % of 4 039 shared83 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany84 % of 4 499 shared83 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands84 % of 3 750 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeSubstitute13 Sept 2024now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeVice-chair14 Oct 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeSubstitute15 Dec 2025now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember7 Oct 2024now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assemblyMember7 Oct 2024now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working groupMember10 Dec 2025now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember10 Sept 2025now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS7 Jul 2026
Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agricultureRapporteurAGRI16 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS21 May 2026
As a member of the delegation he will be participating in an official mission of said delegation.Official delegationDACP5 May 2026
First Caribbean Regional Parliamentary Assembly Official delegationDPAC14 Jan 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS2 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegation · 2 declarationsFEMM18 Jul 2025
A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldShadow rapporteur for an opinionFEMM8 Apr 2025
Gender Equality Strategy 2025RapporteurCONT13 Feb 2025
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairFEMM14 Oct 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

39 contributions recorded; 59 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
14 Sept 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Harnessing the potential of a competitive and sustainable EU Bioeconomy Strategy for EU strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
6 Jul 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
18 May 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
27 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 39 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 27

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026Establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products E-10-2026-002960Written question18 Aug 2026
30 Jun 2026Fertiliser action plan E-10-2026-002704Written question7 Aug 2026
7 May 2026EU-Mercosur agreement: exposure of the European market to the JBS Group and the risks of geoeconomic dependence in agricultural supply chains E-10-2026-001890Written questionwith 21 co-authors30 Jun 2026
22 Apr 2026Digital literacy for farmers E-10-2026-001656Written question18 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026EU – Mercosur agreement P-10-2026-001429Priority written question11 May 2026
25 Mar 2026Commission’s participation in US Board of Peace meeting on Gaza E-10-2026-001240Written questionwith 7 co-authors8 Jun 2026
19 Mar 2026Impact of the Middle East crisis on EU farmers, input costs and food supply chains P-10-2026-001169Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors13 May 2026
11 Mar 2026The Commission’s next steps regarding the proposal to establish a European housing agency E-10-2026-001021Written question1 Jun 2026
23 Feb 2026Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications for midwives E-10-2026-000753Written question7 Apr 2026

Show all 27 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 65

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI10
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI23
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI52
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI17
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI6
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964 AGRI5
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI9

Show all 65 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Croatia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marko VEŠLIGAJ”. Member record. memberId 260035. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=73&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/260035. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/260035?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-260035,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marko VEŠLIGAJ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=73&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=73&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 260035. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/260035. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}