Skip to content

Member

Marko VEŠLIGAJ

S&D · Croatia

Group
S&D
Country
Croatia
Roll-call participation
76.7 %ⓘ of 619 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
96.6 %ⓘ of 475 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
SDP Socijaldemokratska partija Hrvatske
In office
Since 5 Sept 2024
Against clear line
13 of 471 votesⓘ
Committees
AGRI (substitute), FEMM (vice-chair), REGI (substitute)
Member id
260035
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

76.7 %

475 of 619 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (−12.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.6 %

459 of 475 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (−0.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.8 %

13 of 471 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 10 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

2.7 %

13 of 475 votes cast

Participation 76.7 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Marko VEŠLIGAJ76.7 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 96.6 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Marko VEŠLIGAJ96.6 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 904

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 28 503 for, 56 against, 90 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 27 139 for, 491 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 27 59 for, 561 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 25 626 for, 18 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 41 to paragraph 23 438 for, 158 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 22 420 for, 158 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 20 211 for, 434 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 18 88 for, 508 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 12 499 for, 96 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 30 to paragraph 12 98 for, 538 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 96 for, 498 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 10 617 for, 15 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 9 127 for, 473 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 328 for, 281 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 28 to paragraph 9 106 for, 524 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 8 116 for, 501 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 6 96 for, 510 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 6 125 for, 510 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 482 for, 70 against, 103 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 22 to paragraph 6 113 for, 524 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 5 621 for, 20 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 19 to paragraph 2 107 for, 510 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 413 for, 226 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Union designs (codification) Final votePassed 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Framework for achieving climate neutrality Proposal to reject the text 224 for, 396 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 483 for, 102 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Proposal to vote on amendments 206 for, 430 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Amending the Measuring Instruments Directive Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 594 for, 25 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 625 for, 15 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 396 for, 226 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Proposal to reject the text 220 for, 396 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 408 for, 184 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Feb 2026Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel 171 for, 217 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Feb 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine 278 for, 121 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 385 for, 165 against, 35 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital T 429 for, 153 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 2 405 for, 155 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 1 421 for, 150 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 2 426 for, 141 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 1 419 for, 158 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 2 398 for, 164 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 1 426 for, 151 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 2 328 for, 237 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 1 425 for, 147 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital K 406 for, 149 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 2 327 for, 235 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 1 422 for, 107 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 412 for, 171 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 430 for, 157 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 10 — part 2 334 for, 259 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 14 of 79 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Biljana BORZAN S&DCroatia97 % of 4 385 shared93 %
Romana JERKOVIĆ S&DCroatia97 % of 3 491 shared93 %
Tonino PICULA S&DCroatia95 % of 4 450 shared93 %
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA S&DSpain92 % of 3 025 shared93 %
Alicia HOMS GINEL S&DSpain91 % of 3 759 shared93 %
José CEPEDA S&DSpain91 % of 3 870 shared93 %
Lina GÁLVEZ S&DSpain91 % of 3 883 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany90 % of 3 483 shared93 %
Irene TINAGLI S&DItaly90 % of 4 431 shared93 %
Sandro RUOTOLO S&DItaly90 % of 3 336 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Vladimir PREBILIČ GreensSlovenia85 % of 3 865 shared83 %
Kim VAN SPARRENTAK GreensNetherlands85 % of 4 283 shared83 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany84 % of 4 169 shared83 %
Sergey LAGODINSKY GreensGermany84 % of 3 435 shared83 %
Irena JOVEVA RenewSlovenia84 % of 4 304 shared86 %
Alexandra GEESE GreensGermany84 % of 4 215 shared83 %
Catarina VIEIRA GreensNetherlands84 % of 4 283 shared83 %
Jutta PAULUS GreensGermany84 % of 4 039 shared83 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany84 % of 4 499 shared83 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands84 % of 3 750 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI CommitteeSubstitute13 Sept 2024now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeVice-chair14 Oct 2024now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeSubstitute15 Dec 2025now
Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European UnionHOUS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember7 Oct 2024now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assemblyMember7 Oct 2024now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working groupMember10 Dec 2025now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember10 Sept 2025now

Show all 14 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS7 Jul 2026
Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agricultureRapporteurAGRI16 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS21 May 2026
As a member of the delegation he will be participating in an official mission of said delegation.Official delegationDACP5 May 2026
First Caribbean Regional Parliamentary Assembly Official delegationDPAC14 Jan 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationHOUS2 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegation · 2 declarationsFEMM18 Jul 2025
A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldShadow rapporteur for an opinionFEMM8 Apr 2025
Gender Equality Strategy 2025RapporteurCONT13 Feb 2025
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairFEMM14 Oct 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

39 contributions recorded; 59 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
14 Sept 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2026Harnessing the potential of a competitive and sustainable EU Bioeconomy Strategy for EU strategic autonomy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
6 Jul 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
18 May 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
27 Apr 2026Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026One-minute speeches on matters of political importance Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Mar 2026Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 39 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 27

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
8 Sept 2026Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539Written questionwith 67 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026Establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products E-10-2026-002960Written question18 Aug 2026
30 Jun 2026Fertiliser action plan E-10-2026-002704Written question7 Aug 2026
7 May 2026EU-Mercosur agreement: exposure of the European market to the JBS Group and the risks of geoeconomic dependence in agricultural supply chains E-10-2026-001890Written questionwith 21 co-authors30 Jun 2026
22 Apr 2026Digital literacy for farmers E-10-2026-001656Written question18 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026EU – Mercosur agreement P-10-2026-001429Priority written question11 May 2026
25 Mar 2026Commission’s participation in US Board of Peace meeting on Gaza E-10-2026-001240Written questionwith 7 co-authors8 Jun 2026
19 Mar 2026Impact of the Middle East crisis on EU farmers, input costs and food supply chains P-10-2026-001169Priority written questionwith 9 co-authors13 May 2026
11 Mar 2026The Commission’s next steps regarding the proposal to establish a European housing agency E-10-2026-001021Written question1 Jun 2026
23 Feb 2026Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications for midwives E-10-2026-000753Written question7 Apr 2026

Show all 27 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 65

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI10
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI23
17 Jul 2026Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100 AGRI52
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790957 AGRI17
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790954 AGRI6
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790964 AGRI5
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790956 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916 AGRI9
13 Jul 2026Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899 AGRI9

Show all 65 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Croatia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marko VEŠLIGAJ”. Member record. memberId 260035. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/260035. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/260035?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-260035,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marko VEŠLIGAJ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/260035?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 260035. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/260035. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}