Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Member

Danilo DELLA VALLE

The Left · Italy

Group
The Left
Country
Italy
Roll-call participation
96.0 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
90.2 %ⓘ of 5 678 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 92.8 %
More facts (5)
National party
M5S Movimento 5 Stelle
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
379 of 5 246 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, INTA (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
257155
More
Cite this page EP profile (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term2024 (from July)20252026
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.0 %

5 691 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

The Left median: 88.5 % (+7.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

90.2 %

5 121 of 5 678 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 92.8 % (−2.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

7.2 %

379 of 5 246 votes where their group had a clear line

109 opposite (for ↔ against), 260 abstained against the line, 10 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

8.0 %

457 of 5 691 votes cast

Participation 96.0 % — The Left median 88.5 %, 47 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Danilo DELLA VALLE96.0 %
The Left median88.5 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.3 %
Members47
With majority line 90.2 % — The Left median 92.8 %, 47 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Danilo DELLA VALLE90.2 %
The Left median92.8 %
Lowest in the group81.9 %
Highest in the group96.9 %
Members47
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votesAll roll calls
Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 343 for, 247 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 338 for, 261 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 201 for, 390 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 280 for, 292 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 200 for, 397 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4 437 for, 82 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 231 for, 350 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 272 for, 256 against, 77 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 124 for, 428 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 427 for, 156 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 267 for, 332 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3 194 for, 399 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 136 for, 423 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 92 for, 488 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 203 for, 390 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 2 524 for, 75 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 1 596 for, 8 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 427 for, 149 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 111 for, 439 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 1 — part 2 435 for, 127 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 5, adding text after recital H 200 for, 406 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 344 for, 201 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 378 for, 202 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 195 for, 403 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22 186 for, 408 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5 207 for, 397 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 2 512 for, 86 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 1 602 for, 8 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 210 for, 396 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 210 for, 395 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 347 for, 202 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 381 for, 202 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 181 for, 424 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 196 for, 411 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 344 for, 256 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1 213 for, 394 against, 1 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 1, adding text after recital G 141 for, 462 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 22 452 for, 119 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 20 480 for, 116 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 3 582 for, 10 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 2 275 for, 270 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 1 490 for, 120 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 12 475 for, 121 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 4 478 for, 126 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 3 489 for, 116 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 2 479 for, 124 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 3 474 for, 126 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 2 499 for, 95 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242312
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202421
18 Sept 202421
19 Sept 20249288
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 2024109
23 Oct 2024129126
24 Oct 20241313
13 Nov 202421
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245756
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244542
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254540
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253226
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202598
12 Mar 2025228213
13 Mar 20252423
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253533
2 Apr 2025251245
3 Apr 20256257
5 May 202555
6 May 2025109
7 May 2025220215
8 May 202510398
21 May 202522
22 May 20255353
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258782
7 Jul 202511
8 Jul 20255554
9 Jul 2025134132
10 Jul 20253635
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 202510199
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256967
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255554
9 Oct 20256563
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251312
22 Oct 2025186182
23 Oct 20255554
13 Nov 2025267256
24 Nov 202530
25 Nov 20257571
26 Nov 202510097
27 Nov 2025125116
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 20256664
17 Dec 20254343
18 Dec 20254241
20 Jan 20266766
21 Jan 2026112112
22 Jan 20265856
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263837
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141130
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197183
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225218
29 Apr 2026296282
30 Apr 20266864
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269694
21 May 20269896
15 Jun 202621
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127122
18 Jun 20267777
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267271
8 Jul 2026144127
9 Jul 20266766
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155152
16 Sept 20268074
17 Sept 2026124122

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Carolina MORACE The LeftItaly99 % of 5 532 shared87 %
Pasquale TRIDICO The LeftItaly99 % of 5 249 shared87 %
Gaetano PEDULLA' The LeftItaly99 % of 5 424 shared87 %
Valentina PALMISANO The LeftItaly99 % of 5 549 shared87 %
Mario FURORE The LeftItaly99 % of 5 071 shared87 %
Giuseppe ANTOCI The LeftItaly99 % of 4 882 shared87 %
Dario TAMBURRANO The LeftItaly98 % of 5 383 shared87 %
Martin GÜNTHER The LeftGermany91 % of 2 851 shared87 %
Elena KOUNTOURA The LeftGreece89 % of 3 853 shared87 %
Rudi KENNES The LeftBelgium88 % of 5 581 shared87 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ana MIRANDA PAZ GreensSpain81 % of 4 628 shared77 %
Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ GreensSpain80 % of 5 181 shared77 %
Benedetta SCUDERI GreensItaly79 % of 5 433 shared77 %
Cristina GUARDA GreensItaly79 % of 4 748 shared77 %
David CORMAND GreensFrance78 % of 5 485 shared77 %
Saskia BRICMONT GreensBelgium78 % of 5 277 shared77 %
Leoluca ORLANDO GreensItaly78 % of 4 928 shared77 %
Ignazio Roberto MARINO GreensItaly78 % of 4 301 shared77 %
Mélissa CAMARA GreensFrance77 % of 4 917 shared77 %
Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ GreensSpain77 % of 4 569 shared77 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on International TradeINTA CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute14 Jul 2026now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY DelegationSubstitute19 May 2026now
Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-RU DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember20 May 2026now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working groupMember14 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working groupVice-chair3 Mar 2026now

Show all 12 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for a review of the EU's Black Sea strategyShadow rapporteurAFET16 Sept 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurINTA14 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationINTA4 Mar 2026
2025 Commission report on GeorgiaShadow rapporteurAFET6 Feb 2026
Providing macro-financial assistance to the Hashemite Kingdom of JordanShadow rapporteurINTA16 Oct 2025
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/823 of 28 February 2024 on exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association ProcessShadow rapporteurINTA25 Sept 2025
Recommendation for the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on EU-China political relationsShadow rapporteurAFET4 Sept 2025
Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938Shadow rapporteurINTA15 Jul 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurAFET19 Jun 2025
Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldShadow rapporteurEUDS4 Apr 2025

Show all 17 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

50 contributions recorded; 18 on behalf of their group; 67 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 1 minRead
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 2 minRead
8 Jul 2026The EU’s role in the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip and the accountability of Israel under international law (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2026Preparation of the European Council (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 May 2026Recent proposals to fight poverty in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba (debate) on behalf of The LeftSpeech · 2 minRead
30 Apr 2026Composition of committees and delegations Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 151

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2026Common security and defence policy mission to Lebanon E-10-2026-003673Written questionwith 11 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Sept 2026US interference, protection of digital rights and countering extraterritorial sanctions in the Autistici/Inventati case E-10-2026-003612Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
10 Sept 2026Interoperability, business continuity and protection of electric vehicle recharging infrastructure financed through NextGenerationEU E-10-2026-003611Written questionNot yet answered
10 Sept 2026Use of SAFE Regulation loans to procure cluster munitions and anti-personnel mines E-10-2026-003606Written questionwith 3 co-authorsNot yet answered
7 Sept 2026Climate change, public health and the world of work: for a directive on maximum working temperatures O-10-2026-000035Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
4 Aug 2026Ecological risk in Basilicata, breach of EU directives and use of cohesion funds E-10-2026-003205Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
22 Jul 2026Cutro shipwreck, tragedies at sea and the right of vicitms’ families E-10-2026-003097Written questionwith 23 co-authors22 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026Transparency regarding EU-funded infrastructure destroyed in Gaza E-10-2026-002805Written questionwith 39 co-authors4 Sept 2026
6 Jul 2026PFAS contamination in food and lack of monitoring by the Veneto Region E-10-2026-002786Written questionwith 6 co-authors4 Sept 2026
25 Jun 2026The recent coercive measures imposed by the United States against Cuba, their extraterritorial nature and the measures to be adopted to defend the interests of individuals and companies from EU countries O-10-2026-000029Oral questionwith 27 co-authorsNot yet answered

Show all 151 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 26

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
22 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine AFET-AM-786697 AFET6
13 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Serbia AFET-AM-785347 AFET6
13 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Serbia AFET-AM-786972 AFET15
19 Mar 20262025 Commission report on Georgia AFET-AM-786711 AFET12
12 Mar 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye AFET-AM-785351 AFET14
12 Mar 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye AFET-AM-785350 AFET5
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784408 EUDS11
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784367 EUDS7
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784405 EUDS11
12 Feb 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield EUDS-AM-784406 EUDS7

Show all 26 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257155?page=2&scope=all&vscope=all
Official source
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Danilo DELLA VALLE”. Member record. memberId 257155. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257155?page=2&scope=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257155. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257155?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-member-257155,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Danilo DELLA VALLE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257155?page=2&scope=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257155?page=2&scope=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257155. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257155. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}