Skip to content

Member · Former member

Antonio DECARO

S&D · Italy · left on 1 February 2026

Group
S&D
Country
Italy
Roll-call participation
62.7 %ⓘ of 381 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
98.3 %ⓘ of 239 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (4)
National party
PD Partito Democratico
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 1 Feb 2026 (left on 1 February 2026)
Against clear line
1 of 234 votesⓘ
Member id
257122
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

62.7 %

239 of 381 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (−26.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.3 %

235 of 239 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+1.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.4 %

1 of 234 votes where their group had a clear line

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.8 %

2 of 239 votes cast

Participation 62.7 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Antonio DECARO62.7 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 98.3 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Antonio DECARO98.3 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 644

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 385 for, 165 against, 35 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital T 429 for, 153 against, 26 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 2 405 for, 155 against, 41 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 1 421 for, 150 against, 35 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 2 426 for, 141 against, 42 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 1 419 for, 158 against, 25 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 2 398 for, 164 against, 40 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 1 426 for, 151 against, 31 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 2 328 for, 237 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 1 425 for, 147 against, 37 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital K 406 for, 149 against, 50 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 2 327 for, 235 against, 42 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 1 422 for, 107 against, 73 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 412 for, 171 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 430 for, 157 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 10 — part 2 334 for, 259 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 10 — part 1 427 for, 161 against, 21 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 9 413 for, 158 against, 39 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 8 442 for, 132 against, 34 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 7 405 for, 163 against, 41 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 6 424 for, 158 against, 29 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 5 — part 2 417 for, 158 against, 34 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 5 — part 1 430 for, 145 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on paragraph 4 431 for, 140 against, 32 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 562 for, 9 against, 57 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 29 165 for, 397 against, 60 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 12 62 for, 521 against, 43 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 12 72 for, 461 against, 91 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 224 for, 381 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 225 for, 375 against, 31 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 5 226 for, 373 against, 30 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 1 257 for, 330 against, 40 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 1 155 for, 358 against, 115 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 1 262 for, 308 against, 54 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Brutal repression against protesters in Iran Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 128 for, 423 against, 68 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 471 for, 68 against, 71 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 2 to recital A 187 for, 428 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 115 186 for, 418 against, 29 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 103 214 for, 407 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 103 252 for, 373 against, 6 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 7 to paragraph 103 213 for, 401 against, 18 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Separate vote on paragraph 98 459 for, 140 against, 34 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 92 211 for, 410 against, 10 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 5 to paragraph 66 175 for, 436 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 4 to paragraph 59 130 for, 473 against, 30 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 207 for, 406 against, 13 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Paragraph 4 — part 3 426 for, 182 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 426 for, 180 against, 24 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 318 for, 247 against, 67 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitiveness Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 35 364 for, 258 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 16 of 57 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Matteo RICCI S&DItaly99 % of 1 862 shared93 %
Camilla LAURETI S&DItaly99 % of 2 184 shared93 %
Giuseppe LUPO S&DItaly98 % of 2 177 shared93 %
Alessandra MORETTI S&DItaly98 % of 1 914 shared93 %
Irene TINAGLI S&DItaly98 % of 2 125 shared93 %
Sandro RUOTOLO S&DItaly98 % of 1 958 shared93 %
Stefano BONACCINI S&DItaly98 % of 2 028 shared93 %
Annalisa CORRADO S&DItaly98 % of 2 012 shared93 %
Pierfrancesco MARAN S&DItaly98 % of 2 177 shared93 %
Giorgio GORI S&DItaly98 % of 1 913 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands88 % of 2 129 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands88 % of 2 184 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg88 % of 1 908 shared86 %
Valérie DEVAUX RenewFrance87 % of 1 739 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia87 % of 2 102 shared86 %
Lukas SIEPER changed group RenewGermany87 % of 2 051 shared33 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia87 % of 2 146 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia87 % of 1 768 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia87 % of 2 089 shared86 %
Michal WIEZIK RenewSlovakia87 % of 2 143 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 33 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 33

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
29 Jan 2026Activating EU funds and support instruments for Sicily, Sardinia and Calabria in the wake of Cyclone Harry P-10-2026-000378Priority written questionwith 20 co-authors12 Mar 2026
10 Dec 2025RECOMMENDATION FOR A DECISION to raise no objections to the Commission delegated regulation of 20 November 2025 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying the conditions for granting accreditation to verifiers, for the control and oversight of accredited verifiers, for the withdrawal of accreditation and for mutual recognition and peer evaluation of accreditation bodies B-10-2025-0565Motion for a resolution—
20 Nov 2025EU funding of companies linked to spyware and illegal surveillance E-10-2025-004636Written questionwith 54 co-authors20 Feb 2026
12 Nov 2025The sacking of journalist Gabriele Nunziati over a question he asked the Commission E-10-2025-004502Written questionwith 22 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU strategic objectives for the 20th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), to be held in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, from 24 November to 5 December 2025 B-10-2025-0450Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
13 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) B-10-2025-0445Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
6 Oct 2025Defence of the European pasta sector against new US tariffs P-10-2025-003915Priority written questionwith 3 co-authors13 Nov 2025
25 Sept 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan O-10-2025-000035Oral questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
25 Sept 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan O-10-2025-000036Oral questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
11 Sept 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) O-10-2025-000029Oral questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered

Show all 33 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 8

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 8 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Antonio DECARO”. Member record. memberId 257122. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257122?scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257122. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257122?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-257122,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Antonio DECARO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257122?scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257122?scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257122. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257122. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}