Skip to content

Member

Arkadiusz MULARCZYK

ECR · Poland

Group
ECR
Country
Poland
Roll-call participation
97.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
88.8 %ⓘ of 599 votes where the group had a line · ECR median 87.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
PiS Prawo i Sprawiedliwość
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
14 of 499 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, JURI (substitute)
Member id
257060
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.3 %

603 of 620 final votes while in office

ECR median: 91.9 % (+5.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

88.8 %

532 of 599 votes where their group had a line

ECR median: 87.7 % (+1.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.8 %

14 of 499 votes where their group had a clear line

7 opposite (for ↔ against), 6 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

12.9 %

78 of 603 votes cast

Participation 97.3 % — ECR median 91.9 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK97.3 %
ECR median91.9 %
Lowest in the group51.0 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members79
With majority line 88.8 % — ECR median 87.7 %, 79 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 79 members of the ECR with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Arkadiusz MULARCZYK88.8 %
ECR median87.7 %
Lowest in the group46.1 %
Highest in the group94.6 %
Members79
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of ECR; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 39, adding text after recital R 142 for, 420 against, 78 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 2, adding text after recital N 288 for, 273 against, 74 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 1, adding text after recital N 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 29, adding text after recital L 114 for, 450 against, 77 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on recital H 564 for, 52 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Recital E — part 3 of 3 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 86 — part 2 450 for, 183 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 227 for, 390 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 2 457 for, 179 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 1 601 for, 28 against, 17 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 307 for, 293 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 322 for, 261 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 118 for, 429 against, 99 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 145 for, 439 against, 59 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 2 444 for, 185 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 1 554 for, 40 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 225 for, 419 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 223 for, 411 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 255 for, 361 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 224 for, 420 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 217 for, 419 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 219 for, 423 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 226 for, 414 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 224 for, 410 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 250 for, 391 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 3 554 for, 61 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 2 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 1 626 for, 20 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 61 464 for, 179 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 59 — part 2 448 for, 190 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 58 — part 2 456 for, 187 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 530 for, 78 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 54 440 for, 201 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 53 613 for, 24 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 46 — part 2 475 for, 152 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 254 for, 327 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 228 for, 413 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 261 for, 365 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 13 — part 2 475 for, 149 against, 21 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 92 for, 521 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 8 — part 2 457 for, 178 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 362 for, 226 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 319 for, 295 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 2 497 for, 126 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 1 603 for, 29 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 183 for, 416 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ECR

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Piotr MÜLLER ECRPoland99 % of 4 909 shared81 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland97 % of 5 182 shared81 %
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI ECRPoland97 % of 5 646 shared81 %
Marlena MALĄG ECRPoland97 % of 5 563 shared81 %
Anna ZALEWSKA ECRPoland97 % of 5 625 shared81 %
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI ECRPoland97 % of 3 621 shared81 %
Bogdan RZOŃCA ECRPoland97 % of 5 661 shared81 %
Daniel OBAJTEK ECRPoland96 % of 4 713 shared81 %
Maciej WĄSIK ECRPoland96 % of 5 491 shared81 %
Jacek OZDOBA ECRPoland96 % of 5 144 shared81 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal74 % of 5 443 shared68 %
Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PatriotsSpain74 % of 5 065 shared68 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain74 % of 5 418 shared68 %
Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN PatriotsSpain74 % of 5 658 shared68 %
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN PatriotsSpain74 % of 5 314 shared68 %
Ondřej KOVAŘÍK Former memberPatriotsCzechia73 % of 1 167 shared68 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 271 shared68 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia73 % of 4 710 shared62 %
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS PatriotsSpain73 % of 4 353 shared68 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland73 % of 5 206 shared67 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeVice-chair26 Jun 2025now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblySubstitute3 Dec 2025now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assemblySubstitute3 Dec 2025now
Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary AssemblyDNAT Parliamentary assemblySubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 202425 Jun 2025

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Human Rights and Democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2026Shadow rapporteurDROI2 Sept 2026
Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligenceShadow rapporteurAFET6 Jul 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDROI29 Jun 2026
91th EU-US IPM/TLD in Nicosia, 19-20 June 2026Official delegationD-US27 May 2026
DNAT - Vilnius 29 May-1June 2026Official delegationDNAT5 May 2026
12-14 May 2026 in EswatiniOfficial delegationDAFR27 Apr 2026
Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partnersShadow rapporteurAFET15 Apr 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDROI10 Mar 2026
1st Session of the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly (Abidjan, Ivory Coast)Official delegationDAFR10 Mar 2026
The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025Shadow rapporteur for an opinionAFET27 Jan 2026

Show all 23 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

77 contributions recorded, 1 written statement; 13 on behalf of their group; 93 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
17 Sept 2026Protecting people’s health against toxic substances (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure (A10-0212/2026 - Rasa Juknevičienė) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Sept 2026State of the Union (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 130

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2026Problem of assessment in connection with official control of honey quality in the EU E-10-2026-003664Written questionNot yet answered
15 Sept 2026Compliance of the differential compensation of Polish forced labourers under the EVZ Foundation with the principle of equal treatment (follow-up to E-002073/2026) P-10-2026-003665Priority written questionNot yet answered
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0419Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0407Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0420Motion for a resolutionwith 19 co-authors—
4 Sept 2026European register of looted cultural goods  E-10-2026-003505Written questionNot yet answered
2 Sept 2026Conditionality of EU aid to Africa and respect for freedom of religion E-10-2026-003461Written questionNot yet answered
2 Sept 2026Equal protection of freedom of religion in the EU and conscientious objection in the workplace E-10-2026-003463Written questionNot yet answered
2 Sept 2026Alleged irregularities concerning the use of Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) funds in Poland E-10-2026-003459Written questionNot yet answered
29 Aug 2026Accelerating the establishment of a system for compensation and for holding Russia accountable for its aggression against Ukraine E-10-2026-003368Written questionNot yet answered

Show all 130 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 12

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
10 Jul 2026Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partners AFET-AM-790940 AFET23
12 Mar 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye AFET-AM-785351 AFET4
12 Mar 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye AFET-AM-785350 AFET6
24 Nov 2025Recommendation for the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on EU-China political relations AFET-AM-779788 AFET6
12 Nov 2025Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy concerning an enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the light of the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereignty AFET-AM-779608 AFET6
8 Oct 2025Human Rights and Democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 AFET-AM-778262 AFET32
10 Sept 2025Relations between the EU and Saudi Arabia AFET-AM-776795 AFET4
3 Sept 2025EU-US political relations AFET-AM-776839 AFET9
11 Mar 20252023 and 2024 Commission reports on Serbia AFET-AM-770161 AFET5
6 Nov 2024Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024 AFET-AM-765278 AFET9

Show all 12 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Arkadiusz MULARCZYK”. Member record. memberId 257060. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257060?page=76&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257060. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257060?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-257060,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Arkadiusz MULARCZYK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257060?page=76&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257060?page=76&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257060. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257060. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}