| 17 Sept 2026 | Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 | 138 for, 468 against, 2 abstained138–468–2 | Position: Against | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 2 — part 2 | 461 for, 130 against, 15 abstained461–130–15 | Position: Against | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 | 128 for, 469 against, 14 abstained128–469–14 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 | 248 for, 294 against, 60 abstained248–294–60 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 1 — part 2 | 478 for, 117 against, 11 abstained478–117–11 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 | 134 for, 436 against, 35 abstained134–436–35 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Adopted 467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained467–92–44 | Position: Against | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 395 for, 136 against, 80 abstained395–136–80 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 2 | 413 for, 143 against, 50 abstained413–143–50 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 1 | 575 for, 13 against, 19 abstained575–13–19 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 2 | 403 for, 146 against, 50 abstained403–146–50 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 1 | 449 for, 100 against, 62 abstained449–100–62 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 63 — part 3 | 401 for, 181 against, 29 abstained401–181–29 | Position: Against | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 514 for, 61 against, 33 abstained514–61–33 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 55 | 197 for, 400 against, 9 abstained197–400–9 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29 | 189 for, 387 against, 23 abstained189–387–23 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Separate vote on paragraph 17 | 487 for, 45 against, 66 abstained487–45–66 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Adopted 562 for, 1 against, 33 abstained562–1–33 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 | 195 for, 373 against, 29 abstained195–373–29 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained374–198–19 | Position: Against | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 | 145 for, 417 against, 24 abstained145–417–24 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 | 153 for, 424 against, 5 abstained153–424–5 | Position: Against | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 459 for, 12 against, 86 abstained459–12–86 | Position: Against | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Separate vote on paragraph 3 | 517 for, 8 against, 31 abstained517–8–31 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Genetically modified maize MON 87460 Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 433 for, 159 against, 10 abstained433–159–10 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Genetically modified soybean MON 94313 Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 457 for, 184 against, 10 abstained457–184–10 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 442 for, 184 against, 12 abstained442–184–12 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 390 for, 218 against, 29 abstained390–218–29 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 19 | 359 for, 210 against, 81 abstained359–210–81 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 9 | 353 for, 204 against, 79 abstained353–204–79 | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 2 | 311 for, 309 against, 21 abstained311–309–21 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 1 | 466 for, 128 against, 40 abstained466–128–40 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AB | 354 for, 205 against, 89 abstained354–205–89 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AA | 362 for, 208 against, 79 abstained362–208–79 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital Z | 431 for, 165 against, 50 abstained431–165–50 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 2 | 335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained335–279–23 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 1 | 509 for, 115 against, 17 abstained509–115–17 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital D | 593 for, 37 against, 16 abstained593–37–16 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 2 | 411 for, 213 against, 21 abstained411–213–21 | Position: Against | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 1 | 395 for, 179 against, 63 abstained395–179–63 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 3 | 351 for, 272 against, 28 abstained351–272–28 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 2 | 429 for, 153 against, 69 abstained429–153–69 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 1 | 460 for, 129 against, 64 abstained460–129–64 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 3 | 325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained325–296–33 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 2 | 446 for, 138 against, 59 abstained446–138–59 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 1 | 450 for, 168 against, 37 abstained450–168–37 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 60 | 386 for, 230 against, 40 abstained386–230–40 | Position: Abstained | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 3 | 322 for, 313 against, 19 abstained322–313–19 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 2 | 409 for, 150 against, 79 abstained409–150–79 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|
| 16 Sept 2026 | Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 1 | 510 for, 78 against, 54 abstained510–78–54 | Position: For | Majority line: — |
|---|