Member

Nela RIEHL

Greens · Germany

Group: Greens Verts/ALE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 92.7 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 97.0 %ⓘ of 5 493 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: V Volt
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 112 of 5 387 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, CULT (chair), EMPL
Member id: 256964

National party: V Volt
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 112 of 5 387 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, CULT (chair), EMPL
Member id: 256964

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.7 %

5 494 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 92.2 % (+0.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.0 %

5 326 of 5 493 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.1 % (−0.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.1 %

112 of 5 387 votes where their group had a clear line

62 opposite (for ↔ against), 41 abstained against the line, 9 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

4.6 %

255 of 5 494 votes cast

Participation 92.7 % — Greens median 92.2 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Nela RIEHL	92.7 %
Greens median	92.2 %
Lowest in the group	48.0 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	54

With majority line 97.0 % — Greens median 97.1 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Nela RIEHL	97.0 %
Greens median	97.1 %
Lowest in the group	87.9 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	54

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	21
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	129
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	57
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	29
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	227
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	0
3 Apr 2025	62	0
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	219
8 May 2025	103	102
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	81
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	132
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	101
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	184
23 Oct 2025	55	55
13 Nov 2025	267	265
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	124
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	65
17 Dec 2025	43	0
18 Dec 2025	42	0
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	111
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	140
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	196
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	0
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	225
29 Apr 2026	296	294
30 Apr 2026	68	68
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	96
21 May 2026	98	97
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	38
17 Jun 2026	127	126
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	144
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	155
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Kai TEGETHOFF	Kai TEGETHOFF	Greens	Germany	99 % of 4 900 shared	94 %
Select Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Reinier VAN LANSCHOT	Greens	Netherlands	99 % of 5 334 shared	94 %
Select Anna STROLENBERG	Anna STROLENBERG	Greens	Netherlands	99 % of 5 472 shared	94 %
Select Damian BOESELAGER	Damian BOESELAGER	Greens	Germany	99 % of 5 207 shared	94 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	97 % of 4 330 shared	94 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 063 shared	94 %
Select Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Katrin LANGENSIEPEN	Greens	Germany	97 % of 4 993 shared	94 %
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Greens	Germany	97 % of 5 281 shared	94 %
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Greens	Finland	96 % of 4 641 shared	94 %
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Greens	Germany	96 % of 5 435 shared	94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	88 % of 4 370 shared	83 %
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	S&D	Netherlands	88 % of 4 773 shared	83 %
Select Thijs REUTEN	Thijs REUTEN	S&D	Netherlands	88 % of 5 344 shared	83 %
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	S&D	Netherlands	88 % of 5 475 shared	83 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	87 % of 4 614 shared	83 %
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	87 % of 4 878 shared	83 %
Select Lara WOLTERS	Lara WOLTERS	S&D	Netherlands	87 % of 4 983 shared	83 %
Select Katarina BARLEY	Katarina BARLEY	S&D	Germany	87 % of 3 895 shared	83 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	87 % of 3 810 shared	83 %
Select Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN	S&D	France	87 % of 5 311 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	21 May 2025	now
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT Committee	Chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the Pan-African ParliamentDPAP Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working group	Vice-chair	14 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working group	Chair co	29 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	15 Sept 2024

Show all 12 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2026	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	24 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	CULT	13 Jul 2026
A compass for Global Gateway in a world of crises - further guidance for core instruments, flagship projects and the Team Europe approach	Opinion rapporteur	CULT	1 Jul 2026
Situation of international law and the risks to multilateralism, democracy and the European Union	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	7 Jun 2026
Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888	Opinion rapporteur	EMPL	9 Dec 2025
Establishing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for the period 2028-2034 laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/695	Opinion rapporteur	CULT	8 Dec 2025
Conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law	Opinion rapporteur	CULT	8 Dec 2025
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	25 Nov 2025
Global Gateway -– past impacts and future orientation	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	4 Nov 2025
European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities – annual report 2026	Rapporteur	EMPL	24 Oct 2025

Show all 23 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

29 contributions recorded; 12 on behalf of their group; 46 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Presentation of the Fair Labour Mobility Package (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	The EU’s role in the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip and the accountability of Israel under international law (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 Jun 2026	Joint Declaration on ‘Culture for Europe - Europe for Culture’ (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 May 2026	Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Sudan’s abandoned humanitarian crisis: three years of conflict (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Danger of normalising relations with Russia, including its participation in major cultural and sports events (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
26 Mar 2026	Global Gateway – past impacts and future orientation (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Immunity of International Criminal Court officials and the activation of the EU Blocking Statute to strengthen EU strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	European Semester (joint debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	European Semester (joint debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Urgent need to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan and to achieve a sustainable peace (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Dec 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
23 Oct 2025	Audiovisual Media Services Directive obligations in the transatlantic dialogue (debate)	Speech · 5 min	Read
8 Oct 2025	Establishment and functioning of European Works Councils - effective enforcement (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	The EU’s role in supporting the recent peace efforts for Gaza and a two-state solution (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
6 Oct 2025	Intergenerational fairness in Europe on the occasion of the International Day of Older Persons (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Sept 2025	Need for a strong European Democracy Shield to enhance democracy, protect the EU from foreign interference and hybrid threats, and protect electoral processes in the EU (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2025	State of play of implementation of the European Media Freedom Act in the Member States (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 May 2025	80 years after the end of World War II - freedom, democracy and security as the heritage of Europe (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
6 May 2025	Discharge 2023 (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
31 Mar 2025	European Cultural Compass as a driving force for economic competitiveness and resilience (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
12 Mar 2025	Union of Skills: striving for more and better opportunities to study, train or work in the EU and to bring our talents back home (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2024	Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2024	Misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms, such as TikTok, and related risks to the integrity of elections in Europe (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
24 Oct 2024	Closing the EU skills gap: supporting people in the digital and green transitions to ensure inclusive growth and competitiveness in line with the Draghi report (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
22 Oct 2024	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2024	Facing fake news, populism and disinformation in the EU - the importance of public broadcasting, media pluralism and independent journalism (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read

Questions and motions, 33

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
17 Jul 2026	Commission funding for Euronews and compatibility with the European Media Freedom Act E-10-2026-003044	Written questionwith 4 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
16 Jul 2026	EU response to United Arab Emirates’ support to the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan E-10-2026-003026	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	18 Aug 2026
8 Jul 2026	Impact of the recent US Supreme Court ruling on the EU–US Data Privacy Framework and European data sovereignty E-10-2026-002823	Written questionwith 21 co-authors	Not yet answered
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Threat of War Crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian Law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0358	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
22 Jun 2026	Proposed EUR 2 billion State aid to Tata Steel Nederland E-10-2026-002566	Written questionwith 3 co-authors	26 Aug 2026
1 Jun 2026	Action by EU Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič regarding trade restrictions on goods from illegal Israeli settlements E-10-2026-002215	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	17 Sept 2026
8 May 2026	Governance and composition of the European Skills High-Level Board under the Union of Skills E-10-2026-001907	Written question	8 Jul 2026
6 May 2026	Pilot project on European Schools Alliances and its contribution to citizenship education, democratic competences and European values O-10-2026-000023	Oral question	Not yet answered

Show all 33 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 11

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
20 Feb 2026	Recommendation for the Council, for the Commission and for the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly AFET-AM-784240	AFET	11
30 Jan 2026	Establishing Horizon Europe, the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, for the period 2028-2034 laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/695 CULT-AM-784175	CULT	10
30 Jan 2026	Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 BUDG-AM-784180	BUDG	1
17 Dec 2025	European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities – annual report 2026 EMPL-AM-781491	EMPL	20
28 Nov 2025	Global Gateway -– past impacts and future orientation CJ19-AM-781169	CJ19	30
28 Nov 2025	Global Gateway -– past impacts and future orientation CJ19-AM-779672	CJ19	39
23 May 2025	Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement CULT-AM-774272	CULT	43
11 Apr 2025	A new vision for the European Universities alliances CULT-AM-772203	CULT	40
18 Dec 2024	proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an EU talent pool EMPL-AM-766831	EMPL	27
18 Dec 2024	Establishing an EU talent pool EMPL-AM-766953	EMPL	57

Show all 11 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256964?scope=all&speeches=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Nela RIEHL”. Member record. memberId 256964. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256964?scope=all&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256964. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256964?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256964,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Nela RIEHL}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256964?scope=all&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256964?scope=all&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256964. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256964. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Greens

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 33

Amendments tabled in committee, 11

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928