Skip to content

Member

Tobias CREMER

S&D · Germany

Group
S&D
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
91.9 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.9 %ⓘ of 570 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
SPD Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
7 of 563 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET, SEDE
Member id
256938
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.9 %

570 of 620 final votes while in office

S&D median: 89.5 % (+2.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.9 %

558 of 570 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 97.1 % (+0.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.2 %

7 of 563 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.6 %

9 of 570 votes cast

Participation 91.9 % — S&D median 89.5 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Tobias CREMER91.9 %
S&D median89.5 %
Lowest in the group48.1 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
With majority line 97.9 % — S&D median 97.1 %, 137 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 137 members of the S&D with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Tobias CREMER97.9 %
S&D median97.1 %
Lowest in the group86.7 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members137
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
16 Sept 2026Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) Proposal to reject the text 102 for, 543 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 540 for, 105 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) Proposal to reject the text 95 for, 546 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 549 for, 92 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 477 for, 124 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Global role of the euro Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 405 for, 146 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 217 for, 431 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 40 91 for, 448 against, 124 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 36 117 for, 439 against, 109 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 36 81 for, 532 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 159 for, 372 against, 136 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 6 to paragraph 25 209 for, 447 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 530 for, 77 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 10 to paragraph 88 157 for, 458 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 9 to paragraph 87 193 for, 465 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Paragraph 83 — part 3 448 for, 154 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Paragraph 83 — part 2 451 for, 147 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Paragraph 83 — part 1 518 for, 74 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 2 to paragraph 75 529 for, 110 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 194 for, 467 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 57 200 for, 461 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 332 for, 300 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 6 to paragraph 54 132 for, 468 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 52 187 for, 452 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 336 for, 266 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 183 for, 454 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 420 for, 220 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 80 to recital CL 153 for, 450 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 78 to recital BZ 83 for, 513 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 56, adding text after Recital BT 502 for, 90 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Recital BT — part 2 459 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Separate vote on recital AU 461 for, 193 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 1, adding text after Recital AB 204 for, 459 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Recital J — part 2 465 for, 134 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Separate vote on recital B 555 for, 94 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 11, adding text after citation 70 218 for, 406 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 132 204 for, 437 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 132 177 for, 456 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 115 203 for, 436 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 86 to paragraph 115 247 for, 398 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 2 118 for, 448 against, 89 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 1 287 for, 366 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Separate vote on paragraph 108 503 for, 108 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 107 193 for, 459 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 104 217 for, 435 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 104 193 for, 454 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 101 201 for, 447 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Paragraph 101 — part 5 431 for, 181 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Paragraph 101 — part 4 459 for, 195 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Paragraph 101 — part 3 463 for, 194 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Vivien COSTANZO S&DGermany99 % of 5 336 shared93 %
René REPASI S&DGermany99 % of 5 107 shared93 %
Jens GEIER S&DGermany99 % of 4 573 shared93 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany98 % of 3 999 shared93 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany98 % of 4 660 shared93 %
Gabriele BISCHOFF S&DGermany98 % of 5 238 shared93 %
Bernd LANGE S&DGermany98 % of 4 893 shared93 %
Matthias ECKE S&DGermany98 % of 4 964 shared93 %
Birgit SIPPEL S&DGermany98 % of 4 375 shared93 %
Sabrina REPP S&DGermany98 % of 5 265 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Ľudovít ÓDOR RenewSlovakia91 % of 5 090 shared86 %
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE RenewBelgium90 % of 4 075 shared86 %
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY RenewNetherlands90 % of 5 371 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia90 % of 4 944 shared86 %
Lucia YAR RenewSlovakia90 % of 5 395 shared86 %
Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE RenewNetherlands90 % of 5 439 shared86 %
Michal WIEZIK RenewSlovakia90 % of 4 955 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia90 % of 4 648 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania90 % of 5 125 shared86 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia90 % of 4 808 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary AssemblyDNAT Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working groupMember31 Jan 2025now
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
91st EU-US inter-parliamentary meeting of the Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue, 19-20 June 2026, Nicosia, Cyprus)\n\nOfficial delegationD-US17 Jun 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurAFET5 May 2026
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurAFET3 Feb 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE27 Jan 2026
Tackling barriers to the single market for defenceRapporteurSEDE14 Oct 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationAFET8 Jul 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE21 May 2025
European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’)Shadow rapporteur for an opinionAFET19 Mar 2025
Standing S &D Shadow Rapporteur for Georgia 2023-2024Shadow rapporteurAFET26 Feb 2025
Japan ReportShadow rapporteurAFET11 Dec 2024

Show all 14 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

38 contributions recorded; 4 on behalf of their group; 61 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Defence (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Defence (joint debate) Speech · 5 minRead
10 Mar 2026Recommendation on enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereignty (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Recommendation on enhanced EU-Canada cooperation in the current geopolitical context, including the threats to Canada’s economic stability and sovereignty (debate) Speech · 5 minRead
10 Feb 2026European response to the attacks on the Ukrainian energy system causing a humanitarian crisis (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 38 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 9

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0309Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors—
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the case of Elene Khoshtaria and political prisoners under the Georgian Dream regime B-10-2026-0171Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
16 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli B-10-2025-0289Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
12 Mar 2025Need for a revision of the EU enlargement process and gradual integration of Ukraine P-10-2025-001053Priority written questionwith 4 co-authors20 May 2025
25 Feb 2025Countering Russian influence and defending democracy in Georgia E-10-2025-000837Written questionwith 38 co-authors3 Apr 2025
10 Feb 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia B-10-2025-0112Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
17 Jan 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus B-10-2025-0058Motion for a resolutionwith 2 co-authors—
22 Nov 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Georgia’s worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraud B-10-2024-0183Motion for a resolutionwith 3 co-authors—

Show all 9 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 33

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
11 Jun 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure SEDE-AM-789927 SEDE112
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788891 ITRE8
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788849 ITRE6
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788903 ITRE97
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788902 ITRE91
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896 ITRE6
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788895 ITRE4
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788894 ITRE6
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892 ITRE7
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788905 ITRE7

Show all 33 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tobias CREMER”. Member record. memberId 256938. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256938?page=5&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256938. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256938?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256938,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tobias CREMER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256938?page=5&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256938?page=5&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256938. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256938. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}