Member

Mārtiņš STAĶIS

Greens · Latvia

Group: Greens Verts/ALE
Country: Latvia
Roll-call participation: 97.7 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 92.9 %ⓘ of 606 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %

More facts (5)

National party: Progresīvie
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 32 of 586 votesⓘ
Committees: REGI, SEDE
Member id: 256916

National party: Progresīvie
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 32 of 586 votesⓘ
Committees: REGI, SEDE
Member id: 256916

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.7 %

606 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (+5.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.9 %

563 of 606 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (−3.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

5.5 %

32 of 586 votes where their group had a clear line

18 opposite (for ↔ against), 12 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

5.4 %

33 of 606 votes cast

Participation 97.7 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Mārtiņš STAĶIS	97.7 %
Greens median	92.3 %
Lowest in the group	44.2 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	54

With majority line 92.9 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Mārtiņš STAĶIS	92.9 %
Greens median	96.4 %
Lowest in the group	82.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	54

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 24, adding text after recital 13	162 for, 424 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 3 to recital 11	257 for, 292 against, 59 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 23, adding text after recital 8	170 for, 412 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 22, adding text after recital 5	164 for, 425 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 29 to Article 11	353 for, 254 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 28, adding text after Article 3	175 for, 399 against, 23 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 20 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point j	142 for, 434 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 19 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point vii	110 for, 432 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 18 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point iii	119 for, 436 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 17 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point d	86 for, 479 against, 41 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 16 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point b	154 for, 421 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 27 to Article 3, paragraph 1, after point a	175 for, 408 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1	322 for, 255 against, 36 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3	362 for, 235 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2	346 for, 254 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 15 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	161 for, 430 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 14 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	160 for, 433 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1	345 for, 237 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 13 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	119 for, 434 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 12 to Article 2, after point 4	158 for, 433 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4	120 for, 433 against, 52 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 10 to Article 2, after point 4	161 for, 433 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2	369 for, 236 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2	114 for, 422 against, 60 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 8 to Article 1, paragraph 1	117 for, 422 against, 66 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text	314 for, 276 against, 17 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Establishment of the digital euro Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Negotiating mandate approved 416 for, 169 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 417 for, 167 against, 15 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 575 for, 33 against, 43 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 466 for, 175 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital J	337 for, 273 against, 46 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 6 to recital J	292 for, 348 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 5, adding text after recital I	274 for, 323 against, 51 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 4, adding text after recital I	383 for, 239 against, 34 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 2, adding text after recital C	374 for, 233 against, 45 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital B	625 for, 7 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 22	196 for, 423 against, 17 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 19	358 for, 166 against, 122 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14	348 for, 282 against, 26 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9	489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 3	488 for, 68 against, 68 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 2	484 for, 78 against, 61 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 1	453 for, 141 against, 45 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5	234 for, 367 against, 51 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on paragraph 5	615 for, 33 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2	243 for, 384 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 2	567 for, 41 against, 50 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 1	628 for, 18 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1	194 for, 445 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 3 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	0
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	0
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	3
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	6
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	20
8 May 2025	12	12
22 May 2025	6	0
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	6
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	7
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	12
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	14
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS	Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS	Greens	Lithuania	94 % of 5 306 shared	94 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	93 % of 5 346 shared	94 %
Select Bas EICKHOUT	Bas EICKHOUT Former member	Greens	Netherlands	93 % of 4 614 shared	94 %
Select Villy SØVNDAL	Villy SØVNDAL	Greens	Denmark	93 % of 5 536 shared	94 %
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Greens	Germany	93 % of 5 723 shared	94 %
Select Erik MARQUARDT	Erik MARQUARDT	Greens	Germany	93 % of 5 478 shared	94 %
Select Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN	Greens	Denmark	93 % of 5 286 shared	94 %
Select Ville NIINISTÖ	Ville NIINISTÖ	Greens	Finland	93 % of 4 262 shared	94 %
Select Daniel FREUND	Daniel FREUND	Greens	Germany	93 % of 5 740 shared	94 %
Select Rasmus NORDQVIST	Rasmus NORDQVIST	Greens	Denmark	93 % of 5 763 shared	94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	86 % of 4 560 shared	83 %
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	S&D	Netherlands	85 % of 5 064 shared	83 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	85 % of 4 042 shared	83 %
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	85 % of 5 113 shared	83 %
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	S&D	Netherlands	85 % of 5 761 shared	83 %
Select Thijs REUTEN	Thijs REUTEN	S&D	Netherlands	85 % of 5 627 shared	83 %
Select Katarina BARLEY	Katarina BARLEY	S&D	Germany	85 % of 4 130 shared	83 %
Select Lara WOLTERS	Lara WOLTERS	S&D	Netherlands	85 % of 5 336 shared	83 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	84 % of 4 901 shared	83 %
Select Csaba MOLNÁR	Csaba MOLNÁR	S&D	Hungary	84 % of 4 410 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary AssemblyDNAT Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Vice-chair	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working group	Member	30 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	21 Jan 2025
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE Subcommittee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	19 Jan 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	SEDE	17 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	SEDE	6 Jul 2026
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2026	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	15 Jun 2026
Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	15 Jun 2026
From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up	Rapporteur	SEDE	8 Jun 2026
Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	8 Jun 2026
NATO-PA in Vilnius, May 29-June 1, 2026.	Official delegation	DNAT	5 May 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	SEDE	16 Mar 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	SEDE	4 Feb 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	REGI	3 Feb 2026

Show all 34 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

36 contributions recorded; 8 on behalf of their group; 45 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) - Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) - Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Danger of normalising relations with Russia, including its participation in major cultural and sports events (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Defence (joint debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 36 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 34

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0324	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0307	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—
13 May 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response B-10-2026-0245	Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors	—
27 Apr 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0204	Motion for a resolutionwith 8 co-authors	—
9 Mar 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular Africans, for Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0165	Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors	—
9 Mar 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Case of Elene Khoshtaria and Political Prisoners under the Georgian Dream Regime B-10-2026-0161	Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors	—
10 Feb 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0143	Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors	—
4 Feb 2026	Escalating hybrid threats from Russia in the EU E-10-2026-000441	Written questionwith 17 co-authors	8 Jun 2026
4 Feb 2026	Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446	Written questionwith 81 co-authors	10 Apr 2026

Show all 34 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Aug 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869	REGI	35
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875	REGI	18
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872	REGI	17
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870	REGI	5
2 Jul 2026	From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up SEDE-AM-789957	SEDE	44
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896	ITRE	2
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788903	ITRE	1
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892	ITRE	1
11 May 2026	Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 SEDE-AM-788792	SEDE	10
10 Apr 2026	Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786975	CJ57	13

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism

National delegation

Delegation Latvia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Mārtiņš STAĶIS”. Member record. memberId 256916. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256916. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256916?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256916,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Mārtiņš STAĶIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?page=9&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256916. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256916. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Greens

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 34

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928