Skip to content

Member

Mārtiņš STAĶIS

Greens · Latvia

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Latvia
Roll-call participation
97.7 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
92.9 %ⓘ of 606 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 96.4 %
More facts (5)
National party
Progresīvie
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
32 of 586 votesⓘ
Committees
REGI, SEDE
Member id
256916
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.7 %

606 of 620 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.3 % (+5.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.9 %

563 of 606 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 96.4 % (−3.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

5.5 %

32 of 586 votes where their group had a clear line

18 opposite (for ↔ against), 12 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

5.4 %

33 of 606 votes cast

Participation 97.7 % — Greens median 92.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Mārtiņš STAĶIS97.7 %
Greens median92.3 %
Lowest in the group44.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
With majority line 92.9 % — Greens median 96.4 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Mārtiņš STAĶIS92.9 %
Greens median96.4 %
Lowest in the group82.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 138 for, 468 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 2 — part 2 461 for, 130 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 128 for, 469 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 248 for, 294 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 1 — part 2 478 for, 117 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 134 for, 436 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food security Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 467 for, 92 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 395 for, 136 against, 80 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 2 413 for, 143 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Recital AD — part 1 575 for, 13 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 2 403 for, 146 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 85 — part 1 449 for, 100 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Impact of social media and the online environment on young people Paragraph 63 — part 3 401 for, 181 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 514 for, 61 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 55 197 for, 400 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29 189 for, 387 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Separate vote on paragraph 17 487 for, 45 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 562 for, 1 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 195 for, 373 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 374 for, 198 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 145 for, 417 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 153 for, 424 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 459 for, 12 against, 86 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung Separate vote on paragraph 3 517 for, 8 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified maize MON 87460 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 433 for, 159 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified soybean MON 94313 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 457 for, 184 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 442 for, 184 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 390 for, 218 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 19 359 for, 210 against, 81 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on citation 9 353 for, 204 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 2 311 for, 309 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital AC — part 1 466 for, 128 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AB 354 for, 205 against, 89 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital AA 362 for, 208 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital Z 431 for, 165 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 2 335 for, 279 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital J — part 1 509 for, 115 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on recital D 593 for, 37 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 2 411 for, 213 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Recital B — part 1 395 for, 179 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 3 351 for, 272 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 2 429 for, 153 against, 69 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 63 — part 1 460 for, 129 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 3 325 for, 296 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 2 446 for, 138 against, 59 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 62 — part 1 450 for, 168 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 60 386 for, 230 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 3 322 for, 313 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 2 409 for, 150 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 48 — part 1 510 for, 78 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 3 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS GreensLithuania94 % of 5 306 shared94 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany93 % of 5 346 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands93 % of 4 614 shared94 %
Villy SØVNDAL GreensDenmark93 % of 5 536 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany93 % of 5 723 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany93 % of 5 478 shared94 %
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN GreensDenmark93 % of 5 286 shared94 %
Ville NIINISTÖ GreensFinland93 % of 4 262 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany93 % of 5 740 shared94 %
Rasmus NORDQVIST GreensDenmark93 % of 5 763 shared94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance86 % of 4 560 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 064 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance85 % of 4 042 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance85 % of 5 113 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 761 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 627 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany85 % of 4 130 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 336 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany84 % of 4 901 shared83 %
Csaba MOLNÁR S&DHungary84 % of 4 410 shared83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary AssemblyDNAT Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupVice-chair16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working groupMember30 Jan 2025now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202421 Jan 2025
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE SubcommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE17 Sept 2026
No dossier namedOpinion rapporteurSEDE6 Jul 2026
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2026Shadow rapporteurSEDE15 Jun 2026
Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperationShadow rapporteurREGI15 Jun 2026
From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale upRapporteurSEDE8 Jun 2026
Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for citiesShadow rapporteurREGI8 Jun 2026
NATO-PA in Vilnius, May 29-June 1, 2026.Official delegationDNAT5 May 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE16 Mar 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionSEDE4 Feb 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activitiesShadow rapporteur for an opinionREGI3 Feb 2026

Show all 34 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

35 contributions recorded; 8 on behalf of their group; 44 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
15 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) - Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) - Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
29 Apr 2026Danger of normalising relations with Russia, including its participation in major cultural and sports events (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Defence (joint debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 1 minRead

Show all 35 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 34

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0324Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0307Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
13 May 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response B-10-2026-0245Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors—
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0204Motion for a resolutionwith 8 co-authors—
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular Africans, for Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0165Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Case of Elene Khoshtaria and Political Prisoners under the Georgian Dream Regime B-10-2026-0161Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
10 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0143Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
4 Feb 2026Escalating hybrid threats from Russia in the EU E-10-2026-000441Written questionwith 17 co-authors8 Jun 2026
4 Feb 2026Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446Written questionwith 81 co-authors10 Apr 2026

Show all 34 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
27 Aug 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869 REGI35
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI18
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI17
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870 REGI5
2 Jul 2026From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up SEDE-AM-789957 SEDE44
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896 ITRE2
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788903 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892 ITRE1
11 May 2026Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 SEDE-AM-788792 SEDE10
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786975 CJ5713

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Latvia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Mārtiņš STAĶIS”. Member record. memberId 256916. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256916. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256916?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256916,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Mārtiņš STAĶIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?page=3&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256916. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256916. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}