Skip to content

Member

Mārtiņš STAĶIS

Greens · Latvia

Group
Greens Verts/ALE
Country
Latvia
Roll-call participation
97.5 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
93.1 %ⓘ of 5 781 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %
More facts (5)
National party
Progresīvie
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
344 of 5 661 votesⓘ
Committees
REGI, SEDE
Member id
256916
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.5 %

5 782 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Greens median: 92.2 % (+5.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.1 %

5 380 of 5 781 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 97.1 % (−4.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

6.1 %

344 of 5 661 votes where their group had a clear line

122 opposite (for ↔ against), 203 abstained against the line, 19 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

7.5 %

432 of 5 782 votes cast

Participation 97.5 % — Greens median 92.2 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Mārtiņš STAĶIS97.5 %
Greens median92.2 %
Lowest in the group48.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members54
With majority line 93.1 % — Greens median 97.1 %, 54 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Mārtiņš STAĶIS93.1 %
Greens median97.1 %
Lowest in the group87.9 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members54
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 434 for, 49 against, 168 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 72 for, 522 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 473 for, 114 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 606 for, 5 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Final votePassed 431 for, 145 against, 76 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 395 to recital 19 187 for, 442 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 208 for, 431 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 530 for, 112 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 204 for, 438 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 137 for, 447 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 512 for, 120 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 105 for, 538 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b 96 for, 549 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 124 for, 515 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 207 for, 431 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 451 for, 182 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 461 for, 185 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 142 for, 496 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 192 for, 442 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 444 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 194 for, 434 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 120 for, 529 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 438 for, 196 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 452 for, 195 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 134 to Article 6 473 for, 154 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 512 for, 122 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 505 for, 126 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 401 to Article 6 131 for, 447 against, 72 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 138 for, 504 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b 138 for, 508 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 168 for, 445 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 398 to Article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 199 for, 437 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 397 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 158 for, 471 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 396 to Article 2, paragraph 6, partie introductive 197 for, 418 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Sept 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PPE 384 for, 10 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 523 for, 75 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 1 to paragraph 14 157 for, 428 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 95 for, 420 against, 119 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Paragraph 13 — part 2 483 for, 84 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 7 to paragraph 13 80 for, 407 against, 151 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 12 79 for, 531 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 5 to paragraph 10 47 for, 560 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 88 for, 520 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 63 for, 552 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 123 for, 390 against, 110 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 494 for, 83 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 2, adding text after recital S 217 for, 409 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 1, adding text after citation 2 226 for, 409 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Paragraph 34 — part 2 566 for, 60 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Paragraph 32 — part 1 588 for, 56 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 2024232
18 Jul 202411
16 Sept 202421
18 Sept 202422
19 Sept 20249292
7 Oct 202422
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241818
10 Oct 202444
21 Oct 202422
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129128
24 Oct 2024130
13 Nov 202421
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 20241818
27 Nov 20241111
28 Nov 20245757
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244544
20 Jan 202522
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 20254545
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253232
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202598
12 Mar 2025228226
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202533
1 Apr 20253534
2 Apr 2025251250
3 Apr 20256261
5 May 202555
6 May 20251010
7 May 2025220220
8 May 2025103102
21 May 202520
22 May 2025530
16 Jun 202522
17 Jun 20254141
18 Jun 20259191
19 Jun 20258787
7 Jul 202511
8 Jul 20255554
9 Jul 2025134134
10 Jul 20253636
8 Sept 202511
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253433
11 Sept 20256968
6 Oct 202522
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256564
20 Oct 202533
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186185
23 Oct 20255555
13 Nov 2025267258
24 Nov 202533
25 Nov 20257575
26 Nov 2025100100
27 Nov 2025125125
15 Dec 202544
16 Dec 20256664
17 Dec 20254342
18 Dec 20254242
20 Jan 20266761
21 Jan 2026112107
22 Jan 20265858
9 Feb 202622
10 Feb 20263838
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141139
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202611
10 Mar 2026197197
11 Mar 20266060
12 Mar 20263434
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202622
28 Apr 2026225217
29 Apr 2026296295
30 Apr 20266868
18 May 202644
19 May 202633
20 May 20269695
21 May 20269898
15 Jun 202622
16 Jun 20264040
17 Jun 2026127125
18 Jun 20267777
6 Jul 202622
7 Jul 20267271
8 Jul 2026144144
9 Jul 20266767
14 Sept 202611
15 Sept 2026155154
16 Sept 20268080
17 Sept 2026124124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS GreensLithuania94 % of 5 306 shared94 %
Terry REINTKE GreensGermany93 % of 5 346 shared94 %
Bas EICKHOUT Former memberGreensNetherlands93 % of 4 614 shared94 %
Villy SØVNDAL GreensDenmark93 % of 5 536 shared94 %
Anna CAVAZZINI GreensGermany93 % of 5 723 shared94 %
Erik MARQUARDT GreensGermany93 % of 5 478 shared94 %
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN GreensDenmark93 % of 5 286 shared94 %
Ville NIINISTÖ GreensFinland93 % of 4 262 shared94 %
Daniel FREUND GreensGermany93 % of 5 740 shared94 %
Rasmus NORDQVIST GreensDenmark93 % of 5 763 shared94 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Aurore LALUCQ S&DFrance86 % of 4 560 shared83 %
Mohammed CHAHIM S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 064 shared83 %
Emma RAFOWICZ S&DFrance85 % of 4 042 shared83 %
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN S&DFrance85 % of 5 113 shared83 %
Marit MAIJ S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 761 shared83 %
Thijs REUTEN S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 627 shared83 %
Katarina BARLEY S&DGermany85 % of 4 130 shared83 %
Lara WOLTERS S&DNetherlands85 % of 5 336 shared83 %
Udo BULLMANN S&DGermany84 % of 4 901 shared83 %
Csaba MOLNÁR S&DHungary84 % of 4 410 shared83 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary AssemblyDNAT Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working groupVice-chair16 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working groupMember4 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working groupMember30 Jan 2025now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202421 Jan 2025
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE SubcommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE17 Sept 2026
No dossier namedOpinion rapporteurSEDE6 Jul 2026
Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2026Shadow rapporteurSEDE15 Jun 2026
Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperationShadow rapporteurREGI15 Jun 2026
From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale upRapporteurSEDE8 Jun 2026
Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for citiesShadow rapporteurREGI8 Jun 2026
NATO-PA in Vilnius, May 29-June 1, 2026.Official delegationDNAT5 May 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationSEDE16 Mar 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034Shadow rapporteur for an opinionSEDE4 Feb 2026
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activitiesShadow rapporteur for an opinionREGI3 Feb 2026

Show all 34 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

36 contributions recorded; 8 on behalf of their group; 45 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
16 Sept 2026Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
15 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) - Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) - Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Jul 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
16 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
19 May 2026Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 2 minRead
29 Apr 2026Danger of normalising relations with Russia, including its participation in major cultural and sports events (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026Defence (joint debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) on behalf of GreensSpeech · 1 minRead

Show all 36 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 34

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0324Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0307Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors—
13 May 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response B-10-2026-0245Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors—
27 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0204Motion for a resolutionwith 8 co-authors—
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular Africans, for Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0165Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors—
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Case of Elene Khoshtaria and Political Prisoners under the Georgian Dream Regime B-10-2026-0161Motion for a resolutionwith 5 co-authors—
10 Feb 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0143Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
4 Feb 2026Escalating hybrid threats from Russia in the EU E-10-2026-000441Written questionwith 17 co-authors8 Jun 2026
4 Feb 2026Mayor of Budapest fined and charged without trial for organising a Pride march in the EU E-10-2026-000446Written questionwith 81 co-authors10 Apr 2026

Show all 34 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
27 Aug 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869 REGI35
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875 REGI18
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872 REGI17
23 Jul 2026Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870 REGI5
2 Jul 2026From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up SEDE-AM-789957 SEDE44
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896 ITRE2
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788903 ITRE1
18 May 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788892 ITRE1
11 May 2026Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 SEDE-AM-788792 SEDE10
10 Apr 2026Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union CJ57-AM-786975 CJ5713

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Latvia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Mārtiņš STAĶIS”. Member record. memberId 256916. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?nb=all&page=77&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256916. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256916?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256916,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Mārtiņš STAĶIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?nb=all&page=77&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256916?nb=all&page=77&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256916. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256916. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}