Skip to content

Member · Former member

Zoltán TARR

EPP · Hungary · left on 8 May 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Hungary
Roll-call participation
38.9 %ⓘ of 4 836 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
83.1 %ⓘ of 1 882 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
TISZA Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 8 May 2026 (left on 8 May 2026)
Against clear line
250 of 1 798 votesⓘ
Member id
256863
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

38.9 %

1 882 of 4 836 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (−51.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

83.1 %

1 564 of 1 882 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (−10.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

13.9 %

250 of 1 798 votes where their group had a clear line

126 opposite (for ↔ against), 123 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

8.7 %

163 of 1 882 votes cast

Participation 38.9 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Zoltán TARR38.9 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 83.1 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Zoltán TARR83.1 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 836

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 21 127 for, 497 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 21 160 for, 481 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 21 75 for, 519 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 20 106 for, 523 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 19 191 for, 463 against, 5 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 19 372 for, 279 against, 29 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 189 for, 471 against, 14 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 79 to paragraph 18 308 for, 309 against, 55 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 81, adding text after paragraph 17 129 for, 499 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 27 to paragraph 17 151 for, 442 against, 83 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 194 for, 387 against, 90 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 15 131 for, 513 against, 28 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 15 225 for, 439 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 14 318 for, 246 against, 114 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 14 155 for, 437 against, 86 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 13 to paragraph 14 139 for, 443 against, 96 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 206 for, 457 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 12 195 for, 466 against, 9 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 206 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 12 231 for, 411 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 30 to paragraph 12 328 for, 297 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 24 to paragraph 12 221 for, 420 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 11 321 for, 318 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 11 213 for, 450 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 11 178 for, 473 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 11 210 for, 453 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 11 212 for, 448 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 11 172 for, 465 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 11 172 for, 428 against, 76 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 29 to paragraph 11 342 for, 310 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 37 to paragraph 11 151 for, 468 against, 47 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 10 158 for, 475 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 7 77 for, 586 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 6 93 for, 517 against, 67 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 6 66 for, 568 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 6 100 for, 505 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 4 193 for, 464 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 4 192 for, 456 against, 19 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 4 116 for, 520 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 3 210 for, 434 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 3 218 for, 425 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 2 188 for, 443 against, 20 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 1 181 for, 442 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 6, adding text before paragraph 1 68 for, 475 against, 110 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 4, adding text before paragraph 1 63 for, 507 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
2 Apr 2025Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 84 for, 467 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Customs duties on imports of certain products originating in the USA Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 593 for, 7 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Final votePassed 452 for, 182 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 33, adding text after recital 28 232 for, 389 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
1 Apr 2025Macro-financial assistance to Egypt Amendment 42 to recital 28 327 for, 311 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 42 of 91 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Eszter LAKOS EPPHungary98 % of 1 649 shared89 %
Dóra DÁVID EPPHungary98 % of 1 842 shared89 %
Kinga KOLLÁR EPPHungary98 % of 1 796 shared89 %
Gabriella GERZSENYI EPPHungary97 % of 1 777 shared89 %
András Tivadar KULJA EPPHungary97 % of 1 796 shared89 %
Péter MAGYAR Former memberEPPHungary91 % of 567 shared89 %
Davor Ivo STIER EPPCroatia83 % of 1 473 shared89 %
Liudas MAŽYLIS EPPLithuania83 % of 1 518 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania83 % of 1 442 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania83 % of 1 603 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia75 % of 1 841 shared82 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance75 % of 475 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania75 % of 1 398 shared82 %
Sophie WILMÈS RenewBelgium74 % of 1 333 shared82 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia74 % of 1 685 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia74 % of 1 283 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium74 % of 1 795 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania74 % of 1 807 shared82 %
Benoit CASSART RenewBelgium74 % of 1 686 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands74 % of 1 864 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded, 1 written statement; 5 on behalf of their group; 45 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
17 Dec 2025The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
22 Oct 2025Allegations of espionage by the Hungarian government within the EU institutions (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
20 Oct 2025The decision to impose a fine on Google: defending press and media freedom in the EU (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
7 Oct 2025Common agricultural policy (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Oct 2025This is Europe - Debate with the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Luc Frieden (debate) Speech · 2 minRead

Show all 28 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 7

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
24 Feb 2026Political asylum between EU Member States and the principle of mutual trust E-10-2026-000756Written questionwith 17 co-authors29 Apr 2026
11 Feb 2026Request for an assessment of land confiscation practices and of the criminalisation of public criticism of historical legislation in Slovakia P-10-2026-000603Priority written questionwith 6 co-authors30 Apr 2026
22 Dec 2025Serious concerns regarding compliance with European values and EU law in Slovakia E-10-2025-005054Written questionwith 12 co-authors21 Apr 2026
20 Dec 2025Implementation of EU anti-poverty strategy based on accurate data E-10-2025-005037Written questionwith 5 co-authors25 Feb 2026
12 Apr 2025Combating online piracy of live events close to two years after the recommendation’s adoption E-10-2025-001512Written questionwith 14 co-authors28 May 2025
17 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change B-10-2024-0057Motion for a resolutionwith 24 co-authors—
16 Sept 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the “Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice” B-10-2024-0050Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—

Show all 7 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 6

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
12 Feb 2026Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) CULT-AM-784401 CULT4
8 Dec 2025Financial literacy and the rise of finfluencers in the context of the savings and investments union CULT-AM-781320 CULT3
9 Sept 2025Audiovisual Media Services Directive obligations in the transatlantic dialogue CULT-AM-775676 CULT10
18 Jul 2025Protection of minors online CULT-AM-775622 CULT16
23 May 2025Role of EU policies in shaping the European Sport Model CULT-AM-774268 CULT15
25 Feb 2025A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world CULT-AM-770063 CULT11

Show all 6 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Zoltán TARR”. Member record. memberId 256863. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256863?page=78&vscope=all (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256863. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256863?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256863,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Zoltán TARR}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256863?page=78&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256863?page=78&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256863. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256863. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 5a7357168c2a (28 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}