Skip to content

Decision

Macro-financial assistance to Egypt

Effect
Passed
Result
452 for · 182 against · 40 abstained roll call
Date
1 April 2025, 13:18–13:25
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Committee report by Céline Imart
Topics
Foreign affairs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
41 votes · 29 roll calls · 28 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 roll call, 5 split votes) · S&D (1 roll call, 5 split votes)
Final vote
174273
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 452 for, 182 against, 40 abstained (roll call).

Passed by a large majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 28 amendments (13 adopted, 15 rejected) and 3 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted, 1 rejected). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Backed by Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left, Greens and S&D.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 39Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 4No vote 1 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 46Against 59Abst. 20No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 175Against 1Abst. 0No vote 12 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 73Against 6Abst. 0No vote 1 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 58Against 21Abst. 0No vote 7 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.60
ESNFor 20Against 2Abst. 3No vote 1 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 6Against 6Abst. 13No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 40

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria811100.33
Belgium1110010.29
Bulgaria160011.00
Cyprus4101—
Czechia191100.86
Germany5332730.36
Denmark74310.25
Estonia5200—
Spain4213140.63
Finland68010.36
France451511100.45
Greece153120.68
Croatia81300.50
Hungary182010.85
Ireland104000.57
Italy3831070.33
Lithuania83000.59
Luxembourg4200—
Latvia8100—
Malta5001—
Netherlands1416010.30
Poland452510.80
Portugal126120.45
Romania272130.85
Sweden128010.40
Slovenia6201—
Slovakia62520.19

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 674 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches118 Jun 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS SpainEPPSpeeches11 Apr 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 41

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively Show of hands Adopted
2Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
3Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
Show the other 40 votesShow the other 38 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
3Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 5 — part 3 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 5/3 Part voted on: “irregular migration”Roll call434 for, 234 against, 3 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: S&D, Greens
5Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
6Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
7Amendment 7 — part 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 7/2 Part voted on: “irregular”Roll call443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: S&D, Greens
8Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
9Amendment 7 — part 4 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 7/4 Part voted on: “and the Mattei Plan for Africa.”Roll call423 for, 232 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: S&D, Greens
10Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
11Amendment 8 — part 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 8/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call435 for, 236 against, 3 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: S&D, Greens
12Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes Show of hands Adopted
13Amendment 17 — part 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 17/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call439 for, 232 against, 3 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: S&D, Greens
14Amendment 34 to Article 1, paragraph 1 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 1, § 1 – Am 34 Roll call247 for, 288 against, 133 abstained Rejected
15Amendment 43 to Article 1, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 1, § 3, sub§ 2 – Am 43 Roll call305 for, 332 against, 33 abstained Rejected
16Amendment 30 to Article 1, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 1, § 3, sub§ 2 – Am 30 Roll call235 for, 387 against, 51 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
17Amendment 44 to Article 1, paragraph 3, after subparagraph 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 1, § 3, after sub§ 2 – Am 44 Roll call359 for, 275 against, 40 abstained Adopted
18Amendment 45 to Article 2, paragraph 1 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 2, § 1 – Am 45 Roll call313 for, 331 against, 28 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
19Amendment 19 to Article 2, paragraph 1 — part 1 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 2, § 1 – Am 19/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘continues to make efforts in order to guarantee’”Roll call646 for, 7 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: S&D, Greens
20Amendment 19 to Article 2, paragraph 1 — part 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 2, § 1 – Am 19/2 Part voted on: “continues to make efforts in order to”Roll call448 for, 203 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: S&D, Greens
21Amendment 19 to Article 2, paragraph 1 — part 3 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 2, § 1 – Am 19/3 Part voted on: “guarantee”Roll call575 for, 60 against, 24 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D; split: S&D, Greens
22Amendment 46 to Article 2, paragraph 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 2, § 2 – Am 46 Roll call301 for, 338 against, 37 abstained Rejected
23Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 2 Show of hands Adopted
24Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 2 Show of hands Rejected
25Amendment 47 to Article 3, paragraph 1 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 3, § 1 – Am 47 Roll call294 for, 328 against, 52 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
26Amendment 48 to Article 3, paragraph 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 3, § 2 – Am 48 Roll call301 for, 326 against, 45 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
27Amendment 32 to Article 3, paragraph 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 3, § 2 – Am 32 Roll call227 for, 390 against, 57 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
28Amendment 35 to Article 3, after paragraph 2 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 3, after § 2 – Am 35 Roll call134 for, 416 against, 120 abstained Rejected
29Amendment 36 to Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, point a A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 4, § 3, sub§ 1, point a – Am 36 Roll call228 for, 413 against, 30 abstained Rejected
30Amendment 37 to Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, point b A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 4, § 3, sub§ 1, point b – Am 37 Roll call217 for, 409 against, 40 abstained Rejected
31Amendment 49 to Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, point c A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 4, § 3, sub§ 1, point c – Am 49 Roll call321 for, 309 against, 42 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens
32Amendment 39 to recital 3 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Recital 3 – Am 39 Roll call327 for, 247 against, 102 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D
33Amendment 40 to recital 5 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Recital 5 – Am 40 Roll call312 for, 262 against, 100 abstained Adopted
34Amendment 38 to recital 6 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Recital 6 – Am 38 Roll call220 for, 409 against, 45 abstained Rejected
35Separate vote on recital 6 Counted395 for, 263 against, 20 abstained Adopted
36Amendment 29, adding text after recital 6 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – After recital 6 – Am 29 Roll call254 for, 377 against, 28 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
37Amendment 41 to recital 22 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Recital 22 – Am 41 Roll call302 for, 335 against, 30 abstained Rejected
38Amendment 42 to recital 28 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Recital 28 – Am 42 Roll call327 for, 311 against, 37 abstained Adopted
39Amendment 33, adding text after recital 28 A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – After recital 28 – Am 33 Roll call232 for, 389 against, 49 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
40Final vote A10-0037/2025 – Céline Imart – Commission proposal and amendments Roll call452 for, 182 against, 40 abstained Adopted
41Referral back to committee Request for referral back (Rule 60(4)) Show of hands Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Greens, S&D · split votes by Greens (5), S&D (5).

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0037

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its position on a proposal to provide macro-financial assistance to Egypt in the form of loans, as part of a broader partnership package.

The assistance aims to help Egypt address its external financing needs and support structural reforms, with disbursements tied to conditions on human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

Parliament calls on the Commission to keep it informed and to involve it in negotiating the memorandum of understanding with Egypt.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament's amended version of the proposed decision on macro-financial assistance to Egypt provides up to EUR 4 billion in concessional loans, subject to conditions on democratic mechanisms, rule of law, and human rights.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/0071(COD) · Ordinary legislative procedure

Macro-financial assistance to the Arab Republic of Egypt

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 27 June 2025 and now EU law.

Show the 6 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 13 November 2024 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 20 March 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 24 March 2025 (done)
  4. Negotiations with the Council · Deal approved in committee 16 June 2025 (done)
  5. Plenary vote · Adopted 18 June 2025 (done)
  6. Published as law · 27 June 2025 (done)

Lead committee: INTA · Rapporteur: Céline IMART (EPP)

Other decisions on this dossier

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 9 connections: Other decisions on this dossier · Other decisions of the part-session on INTA dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Other decisions on this dossier

See all: Other decisions on this dossier

Other decisions of the part-session on INTA dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on INTA dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Macro-financial assistance to Egypt”. Decision, 1 April 2025. votingId 174273, document A-10-2025-0037, reference 2024/0071(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-04-01/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 1 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 1 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-01, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-01/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-04-01-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Macro-financial assistance to Egypt}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-01},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-04-01/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-04-01/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 174273, document A-10-2025-0037, reference 2024/0071(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-01 (CC BY 4.0)}
}