Skip to content

Member

Petras GRAŽULIS

ESN · Lithuania

Group
ESN
Country
Lithuania
Roll-call participation
80.6 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line
74.9 %ⓘ of 2 029 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 93.5 %
More facts (5)
National party
TTS Tautos ir teisingumo sąjunga
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
410 of 1 900 votesⓘ
Committees
ITRE (substitute), PETI
Member id
256808
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

80.6 %

2 033 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

ESN median: 95.5 % (−14.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

74.9 %

1 520 of 2 029 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 93.5 % (−18.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

21.6 %

410 of 1 900 votes where their group had a clear line

132 opposite (for ↔ against), 253 abstained against the line, 25 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

18.8 %

382 of 2 033 votes cast

Participation 80.6 % — ESN median 95.5 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Petras GRAŽULIS80.6 %
ESN median95.5 %
Lowest in the group70.8 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members27
With majority line 74.9 % — ESN median 93.5 %, 27 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Petras GRAŽULIS74.9 %
ESN median93.5 %
Lowest in the group72.8 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members27
  • 2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 462 for, 76 against, 106 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 14, adding text after recital P 186 for, 470 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 25 to recital P 197 for, 455 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 24 to recital N 182 for, 455 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 23 to recital M 217 for, 444 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 22 to recital K 219 for, 440 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Recital H — part 2 344 for, 297 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Recital H — part 1 497 for, 136 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 39 to recital F 231 for, 412 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 38 to recital D 224 for, 411 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 21 to recital D 194 for, 458 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 31 207 for, 451 against, 11 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Paragraph 31 — part 2 460 for, 149 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 33 to paragraph 31 193 for, 437 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Paragraph 28 — part 2 303 for, 299 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 19 to paragraph 27 206 for, 450 against, 8 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 32 to paragraph 27 235 for, 406 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 26 376 for, 236 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 4 to paragraph 25 220 for, 373 against, 71 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 18 to paragraph 23 185 for, 475 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 22 120 for, 475 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 13 205 for, 459 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 7 213 for, 436 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 31 to paragraph 7 122 for, 450 against, 93 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 173 for, 461 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 247 for, 409 against, 7 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 29 to paragraph 5 115 for, 462 against, 91 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 235 for, 389 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 4 96 for, 389 against, 174 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 1 205 for, 447 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 419 for, 204 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 135 for, 468 against, 70 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 1 234 for, 421 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria Amendment 8, adding text before paragraph 1 41 for, 506 against, 47 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 1, adding text after recital T 78 for, 515 against, 87 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 32, adding text after recital P 118 for, 526 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 25, adding text after recital J 365 for, 234 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 24, adding text after recital E 279 for, 301 against, 94 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 22, adding text after recital E 106 for, 524 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 99 to recital A 494 for, 114 against, 70 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 74 61 for, 572 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 74 190 for, 444 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 19 to paragraph 74 181 for, 384 against, 112 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 73 — part 1 400 for, 216 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 2 217 for, 422 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 76 to paragraph 71 — part 1 267 for, 280 against, 119 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 2 363 for, 180 against, 126 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Paragraph 70 — part 1 489 for, 127 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 69 303 for, 316 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
12 Mar 2025White paper on the future of European defence Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 69 216 for, 438 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Roberto VANNACCI changed group ESNItaly75 % of 1 771 shared80 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany74 % of 4 318 shared80 %
René AUST ESNGermany72 % of 4 495 shared80 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany72 % of 3 499 shared80 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany71 % of 4 270 shared80 %
Irmhild BOSSDORF ESNGermany71 % of 4 685 shared80 %
Stanislav STOYANOV ESNBulgaria71 % of 4 553 shared80 %
Christine ANDERSON ESNGermany71 % of 4 589 shared80 %
Petar VOLGIN ESNBulgaria70 % of 4 471 shared80 %
Rada LAYKOVA ESNBulgaria70 % of 4 167 shared80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany92 % of 203 shared49 %
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group PatriotsPoland70 % of 1 096 shared70 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance66 % of 4 197 shared64 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance66 % of 4 319 shared64 %
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR PatriotsHungary66 % of 4 437 shared70 %
György HÖLVÉNYI PatriotsHungary65 % of 3 117 shared70 %
András LÁSZLÓ PatriotsHungary65 % of 4 121 shared70 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia65 % of 2 877 shared70 %
Viktória FERENC PatriotsHungary65 % of 4 163 shared70 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland65 % of 4 436 shared69 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember22 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202421 Jan 2025
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202421 Jan 2025

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedVice-President6 Feb 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

130 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 128 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 15

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
17 Jul 2026Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
3 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors—
8 Apr 2026Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410Written questionwith 25 co-authors18 Jun 2026
5 Mar 2026Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925Written questionwith 62 co-authors29 Apr 2026
26 Feb 2026Inclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood on the EU list of terrorist organisations O-10-2026-000009Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania B-10-2026-0076Motion for a resolutionwith 1 co-author—
8 Dec 2025Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
2 Dec 2025Inquiry on politicians on university boards E-10-2025-004762Written questionwith 20 co-authors23 Mar 2026
26 Nov 2025Assessment of Antifa Ost (‘Hammerbande’) as a structured terrorist organisation E-10-2025-004707Written questionwith 20 co-authorsNot yet answered

Show all 15 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Petras GRAŽULIS”. Member record. memberId 256808. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=102&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256808. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256808?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256808,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Petras GRAŽULIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=102&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=102&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256808. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256808. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}