Member

René REPASI

S&D · Germany

Group: S&D
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 93.7 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 97.6 %ⓘ of 5 554 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.3 %

More facts (5)

National party: SPD Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 92 of 5 459 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON, ITRE (substitute), JURI
Member id: 229839

National party: SPD Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 92 of 5 459 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON, ITRE (substitute), JURI
Member id: 229839

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

93.7 %

5 556 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 89.9 % (+3.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.6 %

5 419 of 5 554 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.3 % (+1.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.7 %

92 of 5 459 votes where their group had a clear line

74 opposite (for ↔ against), 14 abstained against the line, 4 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

1.7 %

97 of 5 556 votes cast

Participation 93.7 % — S&D median 89.9 %, 138 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
René REPASI	93.7 %
S&D median	89.9 %
Lowest in the group	30.4 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	138

With majority line 97.6 % — S&D median 96.3 %, 138 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 138 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
René REPASI	97.6 %
S&D median	96.3 %
Lowest in the group	81.9 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	138

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	23
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	0
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	81
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	17
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	125
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	53
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	44
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	8
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	224
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	233
3 Apr 2025	62	59
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	147
8 May 2025	103	102
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	0
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	130
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	93
10 Sept 2025	34	33
11 Sept 2025	69	66
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	53
9 Oct 2025	65	59
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	172
23 Oct 2025	55	53
13 Nov 2025	267	240
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	95
27 Nov 2025	125	120
15 Dec 2025	4	0
16 Dec 2025	66	65
17 Dec 2025	43	41
18 Dec 2025	42	42
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	106
22 Jan 2026	58	57
9 Feb 2026	2	1
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	140
24 Feb 2026	43	38
9 Mar 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	197	194
11 Mar 2026	60	57
12 Mar 2026	34	32
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	219
29 Apr 2026	296	293
30 Apr 2026	68	67
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	0
20 May 2026	96	94
21 May 2026	98	98
15 Jun 2026	2	1
16 Jun 2026	40	38
17 Jun 2026	127	119
18 Jun 2026	77	76
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	141
9 Jul 2026	67	66
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	155
16 Sept 2026	80	70
17 Sept 2026	124	123

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Tobias CREMER	Tobias CREMER	S&D	Germany	99 % of 5 107 shared	93 %
Select Jens GEIER	Jens GEIER	S&D	Germany	99 % of 4 716 shared	93 %
Select Vivien COSTANZO	Vivien COSTANZO	S&D	Germany	99 % of 5 434 shared	93 %
Select Katarina BARLEY	Katarina BARLEY	S&D	Germany	99 % of 4 101 shared	93 %
Select Gabriele BISCHOFF	Gabriele BISCHOFF	S&D	Germany	98 % of 5 342 shared	93 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	98 % of 4 797 shared	93 %
Select Bernd LANGE	Bernd LANGE	S&D	Germany	98 % of 5 096 shared	93 %
Select Matthias ECKE	Matthias ECKE	S&D	Germany	98 % of 5 006 shared	93 %
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	S&D	Germany	98 % of 4 367 shared	93 %
Select Delara BURKHARDT	Delara BURKHARDT	S&D	Germany	98 % of 4 362 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	90 % of 5 207 shared	86 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	90 % of 3 998 shared	86 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	90 % of 5 481 shared	86 %
Select Lucia YAR	Lucia YAR	Renew	Slovakia	90 % of 5 500 shared	86 %
Select Martin HOJSÍK	Martin HOJSÍK	Renew	Slovakia	90 % of 5 034 shared	86 %
Select Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Renew	Netherlands	90 % of 5 542 shared	86 %
Select Michal WIEZIK	Michal WIEZIK	Renew	Slovakia	90 % of 5 076 shared	86 %
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Renew	Estonia	90 % of 4 768 shared	86 %
Select Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Brigitte VAN DEN BERG	Renew	Netherlands	90 % of 4 810 shared	86 %
Select Valérie HAYER	Valérie HAYER	Renew	France	89 % of 5 290 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Vice-chair	3 Oct 2024	now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working group	Member	30 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	2 Oct 2024

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
43rd EU-China Inter-Parliamentary Meeting, Beijing and Wuhan, China, 27 - 29 May 2026	Official delegation	D-CN	29 Apr 2026
The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.'	Rapporteur	JURI	23 Apr 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	JURI	9 Feb 2026
Establishing the Specific Programme implementing Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation for the period 2028-2034, laying down the rules for participation and dissemination under that Programme	Rapporteur	ITRE	6 Nov 2025
The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies	Rapporteur	JURI	9 Apr 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation · 2 declarations	JURI	7 Apr 2025
Amendment of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as regards a shorter settlement cycle in the Union	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	21 Mar 2025
Amendment of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings to replace its Annexes A and B	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	21 Mar 2025
2022/0408(COD)	Opinion rapporteur	ECON	11 Nov 2024
2022/0408(COD)	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	11 Nov 2024
2017/0035(COD)	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	11 Nov 2024
2016/0400B(COD)	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	11 Nov 2024
2018/0044(COD)	Shadow rapporteur	JURI	11 Nov 2024
2023/0209(COD)	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	21 Oct 2024
2023/0210(COD) Payment services in the internal market	Rapporteur	ECON	17 Oct 2024
Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	26 Sept 2024
No dossier named	Delegation vice-chair	D-CN	25 Sept 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

34 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 50 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Preparation of the European Council (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (continuation of debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Presentation of the Better Regulation and Enforcement Communication (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Immunity of International Criminal Court officials and the activation of the EU Blocking Statute to strengthen EU strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Accession to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (joint debate) on behalf of S&D	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 34 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 16

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
17 Jul 2026	Inappropriate design of public consultation on European Partnerships E-10-2026-003054	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	Not yet answered
17 Jul 2026	Basic methodological mistakes in European Partnerships public consultation E-10-2026-003053	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
17 Jun 2026	Request that the Commission publish evidence pertaining to the non-activation of the Blocking Statute E-10-2026-002520	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	Not yet answered
17 Jun 2026	Dynamic pricing for major sporting and cultural events E-10-2026-002518	Written questionwith 35 co-authors	15 Sept 2026
10 Jun 2026	Potential conflict of interest in the appointment of the Special Envoy for Industrial AI P-10-2026-002401	Priority written questionwith 37 co-authors	13 Aug 2026
11 Mar 2026	Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014	Oral questionwith 42 co-authors	Not yet answered
19 Feb 2026	The European Parliament’s call to trigger the blocking statute to protect and safeguard the International Criminal Court E-10-2026-000718	Written questionwith 54 co-authors	13 May 2026
6 Oct 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a united response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure B-10-2025-0437	Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors	—
1 Apr 2025	Withdrawal of the Horizontal Anti-Discrimination Directive P-10-2025-001330	Priority written questionwith 40 co-authors	21 May 2025

Show all 16 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 44

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130	JURI	10
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131	JURI	16
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128	JURI	6
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	9
7 Jul 2026	Amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision ECON-AM-790235	ECON	4
7 Jul 2026	Amending Directives (EU) 2016/2341 and 2016/97 as regards the strengthening of the framework for occupational retirement provision ECON-AM-789865	ECON	5
29 Jun 2026	Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partners JURI-AM-790243	JURI	5
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788894	ITRE	1
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896	ITRE	1
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788902	ITRE	1

Show all 44 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/229839?roles=all&seats=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “René REPASI”. Member record. memberId 229839. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/229839?roles=all&seats=all&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/229839. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/229839?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-229839,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{René REPASI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/229839?roles=all&seats=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/229839?roles=all&seats=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 229839. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/229839. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 16

Amendments tabled in committee, 44

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928