Skip to content

Member

Miriam LEXMANN

EPP · Slovakia

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Slovakia
Roll-call participation
87.7 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
85.3 %ⓘ of 544 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
KDH Kresťanskodemokratické hnutie
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
47 of 506 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (substitute), EMPL, INTA
Member id
204336
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

87.7 %

544 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−2.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

85.3 %

464 of 544 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−10.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.3 %

47 of 506 votes where their group had a clear line

19 opposite (for ↔ against), 28 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

5.7 %

31 of 544 votes cast

Participation 87.7 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Miriam LEXMANN87.7 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 85.3 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Miriam LEXMANN85.3 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 28 503 for, 56 against, 90 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 27 139 for, 491 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 27 59 for, 561 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 25 626 for, 18 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 41 to paragraph 23 438 for, 158 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 22 420 for, 158 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 20 211 for, 434 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 18 88 for, 508 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 12 499 for, 96 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 30 to paragraph 12 98 for, 538 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 96 for, 498 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 10 617 for, 15 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 9 127 for, 473 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 328 for, 281 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 28 to paragraph 9 106 for, 524 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 8 116 for, 501 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 6 96 for, 510 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 6 125 for, 510 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 482 for, 70 against, 103 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 22 to paragraph 6 113 for, 524 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 5 621 for, 20 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Central Bank – annual report 2025 Amendment 19 to paragraph 2 107 for, 510 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Framework for achieving climate neutrality Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 413 for, 226 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026European Union designs (codification) Final votePassed 613 for, 5 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Framework for achieving climate neutrality Proposal to reject the text 224 for, 396 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 483 for, 102 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products Proposal to vote on amendments 206 for, 430 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Amending the Measuring Instruments Directive Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 594 for, 25 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 625 for, 15 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 396 for, 226 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Feb 2026Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept Proposal to reject the text 220 for, 396 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Feb 2026Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 408 for, 184 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Feb 2026Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel 171 for, 217 against, 34 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
9 Feb 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Ukraine 278 for, 121 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 385 for, 165 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital T 429 for, 153 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 2 405 for, 155 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital Q — part 1 421 for, 150 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 2 426 for, 141 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital P — part 1 419 for, 158 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 2 398 for, 164 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital O — part 1 426 for, 151 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 2 328 for, 237 against, 33 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital L — part 1 425 for, 147 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Separate vote on recital K 406 for, 149 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 2 327 for, 235 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Recital J — part 1 422 for, 107 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 2 412 for, 171 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 11 — part 1 430 for, 157 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
22 Jan 2026Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania Paragraph 10 — part 2 334 for, 259 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Davor Ivo STIER EPPCroatia81 % of 4 609 shared89 %
Matej TONIN EPPSlovenia80 % of 5 281 shared89 %
Karlo RESSLER EPPCroatia80 % of 4 596 shared89 %
Tomislav SOKOL EPPCroatia80 % of 4 877 shared89 %
Massimiliano SALINI EPPItaly79 % of 5 270 shared89 %
Daniel CASPARY Former memberEPPGermany79 % of 3 011 shared89 %
Zala ČERNILEC TOMAŠIČ EPPSlovenia79 % of 5 061 shared89 %
Eva MAYDELL EPPBulgaria79 % of 2 352 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania79 % of 4 203 shared89 %
Paulius SAUDARGAS EPPLithuania79 % of 5 320 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former memberRenewFrance72 % of 1 996 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands70 % of 4 043 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands70 % of 4 788 shared82 %
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia69 % of 4 763 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland69 % of 4 246 shared82 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands69 % of 4 123 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands68 % of 5 295 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia68 % of 4 138 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany68 % of 3 561 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania68 % of 3 901 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on International TradeINTA CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on DemographyIG10-09 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on DisabilityIG10-10 Intergroup / working groupMember11 Mar 2025now
Intergroup on Freedom of Religion, Belief and ConscienceIG10-13 Intergroup / working groupChair co27 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Mental HealthIG10-17 Intergroup / working groupMember5 Feb 2025now

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
92nd EU-US inter-parliamentary meeting of the Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue, 25-26 August 2026, San Francisco, USAOfficial delegationD-US19 Aug 2026
Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU tradeShadow rapporteurINTA15 Apr 2026
EP Rapporteur on ArmeniaRapporteurAFET14 Nov 2024
Own-initiative report on European Social Fund Plus post-2027Shadow rapporteurEMPL3 Oct 2024
No dossier namedQuaestor15 Jul 2024

Show all 5 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

44 contributions recorded; 6 on behalf of their group; 63 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 118

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
24 Aug 2026Protection of Catholic religious sites in Bosnia and Herzegovina E-10-2026-003311Written questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0362Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0350Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0321Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0304Motion for a resolutionwith 32 co-authors—

Show all 118 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 115

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
4 Sept 2026Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligence AFET-AM-792048 AFET17
4 Sept 2026Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligence AFET-AM-792029 AFET4
2 Sept 2026Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States EMPL-AM-792013 EMPL12
13 Jul 2026General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections EMPL-AM-789962 EMPL3
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790102 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790159 CJ712
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790092 CJ712
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790094 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790100 CJ711
23 Jun 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790098 CJ711

Show all 115 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Slovakia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Miriam LEXMANN”. Member record. memberId 204336. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204336?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204336. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/204336?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-204336,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Miriam LEXMANN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204336?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/204336?page=46&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 204336. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/204336. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}