Skip to content

Member

Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ

No group · Slovakia

Group
No group NI
Country
Slovakia
Roll-call participation
92.9 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
More facts (5)
National party
SMER-SD SMER-Sociálna demokracia
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
Committees
FEMM, IMCO (substitute), SEDE (substitute)
Member id
198373
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

92.9 %

576 of 620 final votes while in office

Non-attached median: 89.2 %

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Against clear lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Abstention ⓘ

14.9 %

86 of 576 votes cast

Participation 92.9 % — Non-attached median 89.2 %, 31 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 31 members of the Non-attached with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ92.9 %
Non-attached median89.2 %
Lowest in the group59.2 %
Highest in the group99.4 %
Members31
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other non-attached members; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
  • The non-attached have no group line: loyalty and votes against a clear line are not computed.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 5 469 for, 60 against, 153 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 3 325 for, 294 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 469 for, 162 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital P 129 for, 499 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 13, adding text after recital K 139 for, 471 against, 53 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital F 175 for, 484 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 41 175 for, 463 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 35 172 for, 473 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 35 122 for, 504 against, 50 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Paragraph 35 — part 2 501 for, 164 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Paragraph 32 — part 2 529 for, 132 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 31 103 for, 531 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Paragraph 29 — part 2 487 for, 137 against, 49 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 23 74 for, 521 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 23 115 for, 543 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 138 for, 378 against, 159 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 21 109 for, 556 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 2 535 for, 72 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 1 525 for, 129 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 122 for, 506 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 112 for, 531 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 139 for, 392 against, 139 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 115 for, 508 against, 46 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Paragraph 3 — part 2 465 for, 187 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025 Amendment 15 to paragraph 3 — part 2 188 for, 460 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 521 for, 90 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025EU-Norway Agreement: modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 525 for, 5 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
12 Mar 2025Parliament’s calendar of part-sessions – 2026 11-12 November 294 for, 77 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 472 for, 75 against, 92 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 57 210 for, 449 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 57 206 for, 456 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 51 191 for, 450 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 190 for, 469 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025European Social Fund Plus post-2027 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 432 for, 155 against, 82 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025European Social Fund Plus post-2027 Amendment 1 176 for, 468 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025Verification of credentials Final voteAdopted 643 for, 10 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
11 Mar 2025Establishing the Reform and Growth Facility for the Republic of Moldova Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 499 for, 117 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group 109 for, 317 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group 110 for, 309 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 443 for, 4 against, 48 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 20 62 for, 408 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 2 to paragraph 17 114 for, 401 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Paragraph 15 — part 2 489 for, 4 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Paragraph 15 — part 1 426 for, 78 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 1 to paragraph 15 102 for, 406 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 400 for, 63 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Separate vote on paragraph 11 475 for, 14 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 142 for, 281 against, 108 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo Separate vote on paragraph 10 464 for, 13 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
13 Feb 2025Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia Amendment 3 to paragraph 27 282 for, 207 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within No group

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Erik KALIŇÁK No groupSlovakia89 % of 5 236 shared44 %
Monika BEŇOVÁ No groupSlovakia83 % of 4 431 shared44 %
Katarína ROTH NEVEĎALOVÁ No groupSlovakia79 % of 5 379 shared44 %
Ľuboš BLAHA No groupSlovakia76 % of 4 952 shared44 %
Kateřina KONEČNÁ No groupCzechia69 % of 4 995 shared44 %
Ondřej DOSTÁL No groupCzechia68 % of 5 104 shared44 %
Aldo PATRICIELLO PatriotsItaly65 % of 2 373 shared51 %
Galato ALEXANDRAKI ECRGreece65 % of 3 682 shared48 %
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group No groupLuxembourg65 % of 5 197 shared45 %
Petra STEGER PatriotsAustria65 % of 5 334 shared51 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

14 contributions recorded; 19 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Feb 2026Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026CFSP and CSDP (Article 36 TEU) (joint debate) Speech · 1 minRead
24 Nov 2025Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
21 Oct 2025Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Oct 2025Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Sept 2025Wave of violence and continuous use of force against protesters in Serbia (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
18 Jun 2025Freedom of assembly in Hungary and the need for the Commission to act (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
11 Mar 2025Roadmap for Women`s Rights (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
19 Dec 2024Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women - EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (joint debate - EU priorities for the upcoming session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 14 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 19

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
12 May 2026Is the EU risking a new crisis and a loss of trust among Member States over the Beneš Decrees? E-10-2026-001958Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
12 May 2026Is the Commission secretly preparing to repeal the Beneš Decrees? Is postwar Europe at risk of falling apart? E-10-2026-001956Written questionwith 1 co-author7 Aug 2026
12 May 2026Is Brussels seeking to revise the Beneš, Bierut and AVNOJ decrees? Will the EU risk destabilising Central Europe over these decrees? E-10-2026-001957Written questionwith 1 co-author7 Aug 2026
12 May 2026Is the Council afraid to openly stand up for the postwar order – the end of the Beneš, Bierut and AVNOJ decrees? E-10-2026-001959Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
15 Apr 2026Interference with the sovereignty of a Member State as a requirement for the release of frozen EU funds? E-10-2026-001530Written questionwith 1 co-author15 Jun 2026
15 Apr 2026Does the President of the Commission intend to use the Hungarian elections to abolish the veto in the EU’s foreign policy? E-10-2026-001529Written questionwith 1 co-author28 Jul 2026
25 Mar 2026Green transition or just a rip-off? Millions of euros from citizens’ pockets will flow into Brussels funds, but will this result in cleaner air? E-10-2026-001253Written questionwith 2 co-authors12 May 2026
25 Mar 2026Does the Commission want to secretly push through ‘parenthood’ from commercial surrogacy and circumvent prohibitions in force in traditional states? E-10-2026-001252Written questionwith 2 co-authors27 May 2026
10 Mar 2026Zelenskyy threatens Orbán with Ukrainian tanks: When will the EU stop tolerating these crazy threats? E-10-2026-000994Written questionwith 5 co-authors7 May 2026
26 Feb 2026Vice-President / High Representative Kallas’s hawkish turn: from experts to soldiers – Brussels putting pressure on Hungary and Slovakia E-10-2026-000807Written questionwith 1 co-author26 May 2026

Show all 19 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 28

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 28 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Slovakia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ”. Member record. memberId 198373. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198373?page=106&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/198373. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/198373?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-198373,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198373?page=106&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/198373?page=106&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 198373. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/198373. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}