Skip to content

Decision

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service

Effect
Discharge decision adopted
Result
519 for · 126 against · 16 abstained roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:50–13:52
Kind
Budget decision
More facts (10)
Margin
by a large majority
Counts are for
the proposal for a discharge decision
Source
Committee report by Joachim Stanisław Brudziński
Topics
EU budget & funds Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
21 votes · 10 roll calls · 5 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 split vote) · ECR (1 roll call, 3 split votes) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
175687
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 519 for, 126 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Discharge decision adopted by a large majority.

Parliament voted on its discharge decision for this budget; whether discharge was granted, refused or postponed is set out in the report.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 5 amendments (5 rejected) and 14 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 4 rejected).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 3Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 172Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 61Against 7Abst. 7No vote 5 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 0Against 75Abst. 7No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 19Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Voted against their group, 24

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria146000.55
Belgium144040.67
Bulgaria123020.70
Cyprus5001—
Czechia551010.25
Germany65192100.63
Denmark122010.79
Estonia7000—
Spain477060.81
Finland130021.00
France4531320.35
Greece137010.47
Croatia100021.00
Hungary911010.33
Ireland130011.00
Italy637060.85
Lithuania91010.85
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia7101—
Malta5001—
Netherlands236110.65
Poland453050.91
Portugal142050.81
Romania311010.95
Sweden183000.79
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia77010.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ CzechiaEPPSpeeches36 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Niclas HERBST GermanyEPPSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Erik MARQUARDT GermanyGreensSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI PolandECRSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Cristian TERHEŞ RomaniaECRSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 49 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Michal WIEZIK SlovakiaRenewSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Arno BAUSEMER GermanyESNSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dick ERIXON SwedenECRSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Monika HOHLMEIER GermanyEPPSpeeches26 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Daniel FREUND GermanyGreensSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Csaba MOLNÁR HungaryS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Pina PICIERNO changed group ItalyRenewSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Anders VISTISEN DenmarkPatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Romana TOMC SloveniaEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Evin INCIR SwedenS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sven SIMON GermanyEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Olivier CHASTEL BelgiumRenewSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Gilles BOYER FranceRenewSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Gheorghe FALCĂ RomaniaEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lina GÁLVEZ SpainS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Bert-Jan RUISSEN NetherlandsECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Mohammed CHAHIM NetherlandsS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Nils UŠAKOVS LatviaS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jonas SJÖSTEDT SwedenThe LeftSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Michael GAHLER GermanyEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Christophe CLERGEAU FranceS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group CzechiaECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Kinga KOLLÁR HungaryEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Fabrice LEGGERI FrancePatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Angéline FURET FrancePatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group LuxembourgNo groupSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Céline IMART FranceEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marion MARÉCHAL FranceECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Sarah KNAFO FranceESNSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Nela RIEHL GermanyGreensSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
José CEPEDA SpainS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maciej WĄSIK PolandECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PortugalPatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Mariusz KAMIŃSKI PolandECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Carla TAVARES PortugalS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marco SQUARTA ItalyECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Gheorghe PIPEREA RomaniaECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Antonio DECARO ItalyS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Giuseppe LUPO ItalyS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Pasquale TRIDICO ItalyThe LeftSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR HungaryPatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECRSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Julien SANCHEZ FrancePatriotsSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Marit MAIJ NetherlandsS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY NetherlandsRenewSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dirk GOTINK NetherlandsEPPSpeeches16 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For

All votes on this decision, 21

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – Proposal for a decision Roll call519 for, 126 against, 16 abstained Adopted
2Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5 Show of hands Rejected
3Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 8 – Am 5 Roll call310 for, 339 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
Show the other 20 votesShow the other 18 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5 Show of hands Rejected
3Amendment 5 to paragraph 8 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 8 – Am 5 Roll call310 for, 339 against, 14 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 8 — part 1 of 3 Part voted on: ‘Notes that, in 2023, the EEAS has faced growing political and financial challenges, as well as challenges with respect to Human Rights and the Rule of Law; notes that Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and its geopolitical consequences continued to be a key issue in 2023, leading the EEAS to ensure wide-range support for Ukraine, exert pressure on Russia and continue its global outreach to address the wider consequences of the war, including the implementation of the Action Plan on the geopolitical consequences of Russian aggression against Ukraine; acknowledges the EEAS's role in gathering evidence against EU-sanctioned Russian state-backed outlets and individuals involved in spreading disinformation and manipulating information to justify Russia's war of aggression; underlines the need to provide adequate resources to the Strategic Communication and Foresight division of the EEAS to effectively combat disinformation campaigns deployed as strategic tools by authoritarian and illiberal regimes; calls on the EEAS to reinforce the Union Delegations in the Eastern Partnership countries to support those countries heavily affected by Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine; notes that the financial ceiling of the European Peace Facility managed under the authority of the HR/VP was increased from EUR 5,6 million to more than EUR 12 million in 2023; calls on the EEAS to collaborate with DG ENEST to ensure effective oversight and monitoring of the projects funded by the Facility; notes that the reignited Israel-Palestine conflict following the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 required the EEAS to engage in intense diplomatic efforts, encourage Union institutions to urge regional de-escalation, respond to humanitarian needs and support regional peace efforts; emphasises that Union and EEAS assistance must align with broader human rights and peace objectives in the region, with strong safeguards in place to ensure that the funds do not, either directly or indirectly, support terrorist or violent activities;’Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Renew, The Left
5Paragraph 8 — part 2 of 3 Part voted on: “emphasises that Union funding for the reconstruction of Gaza should only commence once all hostages taken by Hamas have been released;”Counted384 for, 233 against, 32 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: Renew, The Left
6Paragraph 8 — part 3 of 3 Part voted on: “emphasises the importance of transparency in the allocation of financial resources in third countries to ensure accountability in the use of the Union budget and the new financial instruments;”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Renew, The Left
7Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 9 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – After § 9 – Am 3 Roll call143 for, 455 against, 64 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN, S&D
8Separate vote on paragraph 10 Show of hands Rejected
9Amendment 1 to paragraph 10 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 10 – Am 1 Roll call231 for, 384 against, 40 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
10Amendment 6 to paragraph 10 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 10 – Am 6 Roll call271 for, 290 against, 90 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D
11Separate vote on paragraph 10 Show of hands Rejected
12Separate vote on paragraph 31 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
13Paragraph 31 — part 2 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 31/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call412 for, 152 against, 84 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
14Paragraph 33 — part 1 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 33/1 Part voted on: ‘Recalls the dire situation of women’s rights and LGBTQI+ rights in many parts of the world; stresses the urgent need to better protect these rights;’Roll call457 for, 88 against, 98 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
15Separate vote on paragraph 33 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
16Separate vote on paragraph 40 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
17Paragraph 40 — part 2 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 40/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call415 for, 133 against, 96 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR; split: ECR
18Vote on text inserted after paragraph 48 Counted318 for, 269 against, 70 abstained Adopted
19Separate vote on paragraph 53 Show of hands Rejected
20Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 82 A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – After § 82 – Am 4 Roll call187 for, 465 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
21Final vote — text as a whole A10-0069/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, S&D, ECR, ESN · split votes by The Left, Renew, ECR (3).

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0069

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament granted discharge to the European External Action Service for implementing the EU general budget in 2023, approving the spending.

The decision covers the Service's administrative budget, including its headquarters and delegations, and follows the Court of Auditors' annual report.

Parliament also adopted a resolution with observations, urging timely payments and better procurement practices.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament grants discharge to the High Representative for the EEAS budget for 2023, approving its implementation.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2024(DEC) · Discharge procedure

2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European External Action Service

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 8 October 2025 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 17 September 2024 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 8 April 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 23 April 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 7 May 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: CONT · Rapporteur: Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI (ECR)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 21 connections: Running issue: Annual budget discharge procedure · Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Annual budget discharge procedure

Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service”. Decision, 7 May 2025. votingId 175687, document A-10-2025-0069, reference 2024/2024(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/12 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-05-07-12,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/12}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/12},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 175687, document A-10-2025-0069, reference 2024/2024(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}