Member

Liudas MAŽYLIS

EPP · Lithuania

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Lithuania
Roll-call participation: 99.6 %ⓘ of 5 503 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 97.0 %ⓘ of 5 479 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: TS-LKD Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai
In office: Since 5 Dec 2024
Against clear line: 55 of 5 225 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), AFET (substitute), DEVE
Member id: 197841

National party: TS-LKD Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai
In office: Since 5 Dec 2024
Against clear line: 55 of 5 225 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), AFET (substitute), DEVE
Member id: 197841

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.6 %

5 479 of 5 503 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+9.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.0 %

5 312 of 5 479 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.1 %

55 of 5 225 votes where their group had a clear line

36 opposite (for ↔ against), 18 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.1 %

117 of 5 479 votes cast

Participation 99.6 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Liudas MAŽYLIS	99.6 %
EPP median	89.9 %
Lowest in the group	17.0 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	196

With majority line 97.0 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Liudas MAŽYLIS	97.0 %
EPP median	93.6 %
Lowest in the group	70.2 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	196

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 503

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 24, adding text after recital 13	162 for, 424 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 3 to recital 11	257 for, 292 against, 59 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 23, adding text after recital 8	170 for, 412 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 22, adding text after recital 5	164 for, 425 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 29 to Article 11	353 for, 254 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 28, adding text after Article 3	175 for, 399 against, 23 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 20 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point j	142 for, 434 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 19 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point vii	110 for, 432 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 18 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point iii	119 for, 436 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 17 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point d	86 for, 479 against, 41 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 16 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point b	154 for, 421 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 27 to Article 3, paragraph 1, after point a	175 for, 408 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1	322 for, 255 against, 36 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3	362 for, 235 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2	346 for, 254 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 15 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	161 for, 430 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 14 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	160 for, 433 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1	345 for, 237 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 13 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	119 for, 434 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 12 to Article 2, after point 4	158 for, 433 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4	120 for, 433 against, 52 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 10 to Article 2, after point 4	161 for, 433 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2	369 for, 236 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2	114 for, 422 against, 60 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 8 to Article 1, paragraph 1	117 for, 422 against, 66 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text	314 for, 276 against, 17 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Establishment of the digital euro Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Negotiating mandate approved 416 for, 169 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 417 for, 167 against, 15 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 575 for, 33 against, 43 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 466 for, 175 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital J	337 for, 273 against, 46 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 6 to recital J	292 for, 348 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 5, adding text after recital I	274 for, 323 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 4, adding text after recital I	383 for, 239 against, 34 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 2, adding text after recital C	374 for, 233 against, 45 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital B	625 for, 7 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 22	196 for, 423 against, 17 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 19	358 for, 166 against, 122 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14	348 for, 282 against, 26 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9	489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 3	488 for, 68 against, 68 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 2	484 for, 78 against, 61 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 1	453 for, 141 against, 45 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5	234 for, 367 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on paragraph 5	615 for, 33 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2	243 for, 384 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 2	567 for, 41 against, 50 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 1	628 for, 18 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1	194 for, 445 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 88 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45
20 Jan 2025	2	0
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	41
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	28
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	226
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	0
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	250
3 Apr 2025	62	60
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	219
8 May 2025	103	103
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	40
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	87
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	53
9 Jul 2025	134	134
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	101
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	186
23 Oct 2025	55	55
13 Nov 2025	267	267
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	125
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	42
18 Dec 2025	42	42
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	112
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	141
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	197
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	224
29 Apr 2026	296	296
30 Apr 2026	68	68
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	96
21 May 2026	98	98
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	127
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	144
9 Jul 2026	67	66
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	154
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 327 shared	89 %
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	EPP	Romania	97 % of 4 237 shared	89 %
Select Gheorghe FALCĂ	Gheorghe FALCĂ	EPP	Romania	97 % of 4 703 shared	89 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	97 % of 4 369 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	97 % of 4 416 shared	89 %
Select Niels GEUKING	Niels GEUKING	EPP	Germany	97 % of 5 430 shared	89 %
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	97 % of 3 266 shared	89 %
Select Virgil-Daniel POPESCU	Virgil-Daniel POPESCU	EPP	Romania	97 % of 4 954 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	97 % of 4 230 shared	89 %
Select Siegfried MUREŞAN	Siegfried MUREŞAN	EPP	Romania	96 % of 5 225 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	88 % of 4 885 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	87 % of 4 789 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 5 297 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	86 % of 4 077 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	86 % of 4 180 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	86 % of 4 208 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	86 % of 4 260 shared	82 %
Select Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE	Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former member	Renew	France	86 % of 1 942 shared	82 %
Select Jeannette BALJEU	Jeannette BALJEU	Renew	Netherlands	86 % of 4 769 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	85 % of 4 928 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Substitute	11 Dec 2024	now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Substitute	11 Dec 2024	now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE Committee	Member	16 Dec 2024	now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI Subcommittee	Member	16 Dec 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD Delegation	Member	16 Dec 2024	now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assembly	Member	16 Dec 2024	now

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Need for a long-term EU development cooperation strategy to face challenges in education in developing countries	Shadow rapporteur	DEVE	22 Sept 2026
EU strategy to face the new theories against democracy	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	DEVE	12 Dec 2025
Mission to Yerevan, Armenia in connection with the 12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest PA, 28-30 October, 2025.\n	Official delegation	DEPA	9 Oct 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

50 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 65 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid (JOIN(2026)0025) (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid (JOIN(2026)0025) (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Moldova (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Protecting EU citizens’ data from hybrid threats: the Lithuanian case (topical debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
18 May 2026	The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 73

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405	Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418	Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0362	Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0321	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328	Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0304	Motion for a resolutionwith 32 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0292	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
9 Jun 2026	Strengthening prevention, mental well-being and healthy ageing through improved hearing health E-10-2026-002380	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	21 Aug 2026

Show all 73 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 25

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789070	CJ19	37
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789071	CJ19	11
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789072	CJ19	14
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789067	CJ19	18
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789068	CJ19	20
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789069	CJ19	43
22 Apr 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine AFET-AM-786697	AFET	21
13 Apr 2026	2025 Commission report on Kosovo AFET-AM-785346	AFET	15
10 Apr 2026	2025 Commission report on Moldova AFET-AM-786967	AFET	21
19 Mar 2026	Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888 DEVE-AM-785438	DEVE	38

Show all 25 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Lithuania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=9&rows=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Liudas MAŽYLIS”. Member record. memberId 197841. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=9&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197841. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197841?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197841,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Liudas MAŽYLIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=9&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=9&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197841. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197841. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 503

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 73

Amendments tabled in committee, 25

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 503