Skip to content

Member

Liudas MAŽYLIS

EPP · Lithuania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Lithuania
Roll-call participation
99.6 %ⓘ of 5 503 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
97.0 %ⓘ of 5 479 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
TS-LKD Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai
In office
Since 5 Dec 2024
Against clear line
55 of 5 225 votesⓘ
Committees
AFCO (substitute), AFET (substitute), DEVE
Member id
197841
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

99.6 %

5 479 of 5 503 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+9.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.0 %

5 312 of 5 479 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.1 %

55 of 5 225 votes where their group had a clear line

36 opposite (for ↔ against), 18 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.1 %

117 of 5 479 votes cast

Participation 99.6 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Liudas MAŽYLIS99.6 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 97.0 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Liudas MAŽYLIS97.0 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 503

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital G — part 2 149 for, 331 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital G — part 1 495 for, 23 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital F 517 for, 10 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital E 489 for, 28 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital D 510 for, 7 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital C 497 for, 30 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital B — part 2 341 for, 180 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Recital B — part 1 484 for, 34 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on recital A 491 for, 28 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 25 81 for, 397 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 62 for, 418 against, 68 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 25 85 for, 413 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 25 84 for, 416 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 3 408 for, 96 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 2 357 for, 144 against, 49 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Paragraph 9 — part 1 319 for, 190 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on paragraph 2 503 for, 12 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland Separate vote on paragraph 1 522 for, 4 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 169 for, 389 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 15 167 for, 363 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 176 for, 249 against, 140 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 15 — part 2 409 for, 144 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 372 for, 139 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 3 402 for, 135 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 2 262 for, 291 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Paragraph 14 — part 1 509 for, 48 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 283 for, 199 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 14, adding text after recital F 217 for, 319 against, 31 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 181 for, 379 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime Separate vote on paragraph 3 431 for, 58 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 13, adding text after recital A 238 for, 315 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 23 to paragraph 5 166 for, 394 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 215 for, 313 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 4 248 for, 279 against, 38 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 4 267 for, 245 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 4 264 for, 289 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 213 for, 324 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 202 for, 330 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 206 for, 319 against, 28 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 195 for, 353 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 202 for, 329 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 112 for, 330 against, 124 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 185 for, 334 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba Amendment 22 to paragraph 1 177 for, 381 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 294 for, 245 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 6, adding text after recital Q 288 for, 263 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 5, adding text after recital M 302 for, 256 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 4, adding text after recital M 291 for, 269 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 282 for, 276 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jun 2026Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines Amendment 8 to paragraph 8 282 for, 274 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 88 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany98 % of 4 327 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania97 % of 4 237 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania97 % of 4 703 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany97 % of 4 369 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania97 % of 4 416 shared89 %
Niels GEUKING EPPGermany97 % of 5 430 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany97 % of 3 266 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania97 % of 4 954 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany97 % of 4 230 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania96 % of 5 225 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia88 % of 4 885 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania87 % of 4 789 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium86 % of 5 297 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania86 % of 4 077 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 180 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia86 % of 4 208 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland86 % of 4 260 shared82 %
Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former memberRenewFrance86 % of 1 942 shared82 %
Jeannette BALJEU RenewNetherlands86 % of 4 769 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium85 % of 4 928 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO CommitteeSubstitute11 Dec 2024now
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute11 Dec 2024now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE CommitteeMember16 Dec 2024now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeMember16 Dec 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationMember16 Dec 2024now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember16 Dec 2024now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
Need for a long-term EU development cooperation strategy to face challenges in education in developing countriesShadow rapporteurDEVE22 Sept 2026
EU strategy to face the new theories against democracyShadow rapporteur for an opinionDEVE12 Dec 2025
Mission to Yerevan, Armenia in connection with the 12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest PA, 28-30 October, 2025.\nOfficial delegationDEPA9 Oct 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

50 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 65 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 73

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0362Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0321Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0304Motion for a resolutionwith 32 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0292Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
9 Jun 2026Strengthening prevention, mental well-being and healthy ageing through improved hearing health E-10-2026-002380Written questionwith 15 co-authors21 Aug 2026

Show all 73 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 25

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789070 CJ1937
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789071 CJ1911
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789072 CJ1914
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789067 CJ1918
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789068 CJ1920
26 May 2026Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789069 CJ1943
22 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Ukraine AFET-AM-786697 AFET21
13 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Kosovo AFET-AM-785346 AFET15
10 Apr 20262025 Commission report on Moldova AFET-AM-786967 AFET21
19 Mar 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888 DEVE-AM-785438 DEVE38

Show all 25 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Liudas MAŽYLIS”. Member record. memberId 197841. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=14&seats=all&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197841. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197841?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197841,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Liudas MAŽYLIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=14&seats=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197841?page=14&seats=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197841. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197841. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}