Member · Former member

Tom BERENDSEN

EPP · Netherlands · left on 22 February 2026

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Netherlands
Roll-call participation: 98.2 %ⓘ of 3 838 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 97.3 %ⓘ of 3 770 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %

More facts (4)

National party: CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office: 16 Jul 2024 – 22 Feb 2026 (left on 22 February 2026)
Against clear line: 60 of 3 569 votesⓘ
Member id: 197778

National party: CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office: 16 Jul 2024 – 22 Feb 2026 (left on 22 February 2026)
Against clear line: 60 of 3 569 votesⓘ
Member id: 197778

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.2 %

3 770 of 3 838 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+8.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.3 %

3 670 of 3 770 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.7 %

60 of 3 569 votes where their group had a clear line

32 opposite (for ↔ against), 28 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

55 of 3 770 votes cast

Participation 98.2 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Tom BERENDSEN	98.2 %
EPP median	89.9 %
Lowest in the group	17.0 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	196

With majority line 97.3 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Tom BERENDSEN	97.3 %
EPP median	93.6 %
Lowest in the group	70.2 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	196

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 838

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
23 Jan 2025	Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 2	419 for, 172 against, 23 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025	Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine Paragraph 10 — part 1	415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025	Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 533 for, 24 against, 48 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025	Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 1, adding text after recital D	113 for, 431 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 5	62 for, 540 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 5	135 for, 435 against, 42 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 556 for, 6 against, 42 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025	Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 3 to paragraph 5	164 for, 435 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 5 to paragraph 5	56 for, 546 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2	109 for, 443 against, 61 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Paragraph 7 — part 2	437 for, 158 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
23 Jan 2025	Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6	337 for, 246 against, 29 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4	456 for, 135 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostages Amendment 4 to paragraph 3	170 for, 396 against, 39 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	150 for, 448 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 7	162 for, 312 against, 137 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
23 Jan 2025	Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4	272 for, 290 against, 46 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
22 Jan 2025	Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 567 for, 25 against, 66 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
22 Jan 2025	Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in Belarus Amendments 4 + 7 (voted as one) to paragraph 19	429 for, 205 against, 23 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
21 Jan 2025	EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2025	Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe The Left	196 for, 221 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2025	Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE	108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 1, adding text after recital K	197 for, 342 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on recital K	328 for, 143 against, 85 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on citation 14	310 for, 183 against, 50 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 9 to paragraph 1, after point ar	170 for, 364 against, 15 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point an	319 for, 183 against, 45 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 5	364 for, 120 against, 58 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 4	356 for, 157 against, 36 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 3	328 for, 178 against, 38 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 2	366 for, 116 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point al — part 1	492 for, 43 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, point al	154 for, 379 against, 26 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 8 to paragraph 1, point ak	204 for, 355 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point ag	152 for, 383 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, point ag	210 for, 332 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point af	167 for, 384 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 2	271 for, 268 against, 28 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point af — part 1	549 for, 14 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2	264 for, 292 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1	424 for, 141 against, 1 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point w — part 2	355 for, 177 against, 29 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point w — part 1	395 for, 151 against, 24 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 5	384 for, 158 against, 23 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 4	382 for, 159 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 3	267 for, 297 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 2	276 for, 287 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 1	421 for, 89 against, 61 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
19 Dec 2024	Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 2	389 for, 153 against, 26 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	23
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	4
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	129
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	0
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	45
20 Jan 2025	2	0
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	41
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	29
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	228
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	249
3 Apr 2025	62	62
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	220
8 May 2025	103	103
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	87
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	134
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	101
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	54
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	186
23 Oct 2025	55	55
13 Nov 2025	267	267
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	125
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	42
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	112
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	140

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Jeroen LENAERS	Jeroen LENAERS	EPP	Netherlands	100 % of 3 759 shared	89 %
Select Ingeborg TER LAAK	Ingeborg TER LAAK	EPP	Netherlands	100 % of 3 742 shared	89 %
Select Siegfried MUREŞAN	Siegfried MUREŞAN	EPP	Romania	97 % of 3 594 shared	89 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	97 % of 3 045 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	97 % of 2 789 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	97 % of 2 955 shared	89 %
Select Pekka TOVERI	Pekka TOVERI	EPP	Finland	97 % of 3 321 shared	89 %
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	97 % of 2 984 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	97 % of 3 093 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	97 % of 3 686 shared	89 %

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	89 % of 3 682 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	89 % of 2 345 shared	82 %
Select Anouk VAN BRUG	Anouk VAN BRUG	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 2 316 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 3 594 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 3 098 shared	82 %
Select Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Renew	Germany	88 % of 2 660 shared	82 %
Select Moritz KÖRNER	Moritz KÖRNER	Renew	Germany	88 % of 3 672 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	88 % of 3 247 shared	82 %
Select Malik AZMANI	Malik AZMANI	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 3 737 shared	82 %
Select Svenja HAHN	Svenja HAHN	Renew	Germany	88 % of 3 368 shared	82 %

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

23 contributions recorded; 33 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Grids package and tackling raising energy prices through robust infrastructure (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Effective use of the EU trade and industrial policy to tackle China’s export restrictions (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Oct 2025	Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Oct 2025	Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate)	Speech	Read
21 Oct 2025	Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
8 Oct 2025	United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	Inland waterway transport: River Information Services (RIS) (A10-0033/2025 - Tom Berendsen) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Sept 2025	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 23 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 14

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
18 Dec 2025	European commitment to small modular (maritime) nuclear reactors E-10-2025-005005	Written question	9 Mar 2026
18 Dec 2025	Stop the Russian nickel trade via Rotterdam E-10-2025-005006	Written question	12 Feb 2026
17 Dec 2025	Acquisitions of Notified Bodies by companies from third countries E-10-2025-004986	Written question	24 Feb 2026
23 Jul 2025	Exemption for temporary construction emissions and depositions for sustainable projects P-10-2025-003051	Priority written question	3 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025	Ensuring that demand meets supply in the CO<sub>2</sub> storage market E-10-2025-002712	Written questionwith 1 co-author	12 Sept 2025
10 Jun 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Clean Industrial Deal B-10-2025-0277	Motion for a resolution	—
5 Jun 2025	Clean Industrial Deal O-10-2025-000020	Oral question	Not yet answered
27 May 2025	Increase in number of attacks with explosives in the Netherlands – Need for European action E-10-2025-002111	Written questionwith 1 co-author	31 Jul 2025
2 May 2025	Apollo Vredestein workers fall victim to inadequate State aid rules P-10-2025-001790	Priority written question	18 Jun 2025
17 Mar 2025	Tackling barriers to collecting road traffic fines and parking charges from foreign motorists E-10-2025-001123	Written question	2 Jun 2025

Show all 14 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
17 Sept 2025	Military mobility CJ57-AM-777035	CJ57	1
17 Sept 2025	Military mobility CJ57-AM-777036	CJ57	1
4 Jun 2025	Establishing harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of interest representation carried out on behalf of third countries and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 AFCO-AM-774387	AFCO	7
22 May 2025	Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement ITRE-AM-773329	ITRE	1
28 Mar 2025	European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) CJ55-AM-771939	CJ55	1
28 Mar 2025	European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) CJ55-AM-771936	CJ55	1
28 Mar 2025	European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) CJ55-AM-771938	CJ55	2

Show all 7 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Netherlands National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?nb=all&page=67&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tom BERENDSEN”. Member record. memberId 197778. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?nb=all&page=67&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197778?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197778,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tom BERENDSEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?nb=all&page=67&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?nb=all&page=67&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197778. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 3 838

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 14

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 3 838