Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point af — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point af — part 2
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 19 Dec 2024
Result
271 for · 268 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 December 2024, 12:17
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 46 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Renew, Greens, The Left · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10–0030/2024 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point af/2
Text
Report A-10-2024-0030
Dossier
2024/2057(INI)
Vote id
171327
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 271 for, 268 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 3Abst. 0No vote 25 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 58Against 4Abst. 1No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 6Against 126Abst. 2No vote 54 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 1Against 42Abst. 19No vote 18 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
PatriotsFor 1Against 67Abst. 0No vote 18 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 0No vote 4 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 5Abst. 6No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece200
Ireland300
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 567 members

No vote recorded, 152

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 152 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 67 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote251 for, 349 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 489 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote243 for, 303 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 451 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 512 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 473 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment264 for, 252 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 484 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.90 497 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.90 533 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 478 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 477 voters
22 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Separate vote266 for, 304 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.90 481 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171327
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 19 December 2024. votingId 171327, reference 2024/2057(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171327 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-12-19-171327,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171327}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171327},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171327, reference 2024/2057(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}