Skip to content

Member · Former member

Tom BERENDSEN

EPP · Netherlands · left on 22 February 2026

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Netherlands
Roll-call participation
98.2 %ⓘ of 3 838 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
97.3 %ⓘ of 3 770 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.6 %
More facts (4)
National party
CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 22 Feb 2026 (left on 22 February 2026)
Against clear line
60 of 3 569 votesⓘ
Member id
197778
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

98.2 %

3 770 of 3 838 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 89.9 % (+8.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.3 %

3 670 of 3 770 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.6 % (+3.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.7 %

60 of 3 569 votes where their group had a clear line

32 opposite (for ↔ against), 28 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.5 %

55 of 3 770 votes cast

Participation 98.2 % — EPP median 89.9 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Tom BERENDSEN98.2 %
EPP median89.9 %
Lowest in the group17.0 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members196
With majority line 97.3 % — EPP median 93.6 %, 196 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 196 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Tom BERENDSEN97.3 %
EPP median93.6 %
Lowest in the group70.2 %
Highest in the group99.5 %
Members196
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 838

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendment 17 547 for, 88 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively — Ams 1-10, 13, 18-25, 27-30, 32-35, 37, 40 396 for, 229 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Framework for achieving climate neutrality Proposal to reject the text 234 for, 399 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
13 Nov 2025Addressing transnational repression of human rights defenders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 512 for, 76 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Proxy voting in plenary for Members during pregnancy and after giving birth Final vote — text as a whole 605 for, 30 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
13 Nov 2025Addressing transnational repression of human rights defenders Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 315 for, 202 against, 119 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 71 — part 2 374 for, 149 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 71 — part 1 439 for, 100 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 67 — part 2 363 for, 173 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 67 — part 1 473 for, 51 against, 43 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Amendment 1 to paragraph 57 172 for, 368 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Separate vote on paragraph 55 378 for, 127 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 54 — part 2 374 for, 122 against, 68 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan Paragraph 54 — part 1 456 for, 68 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 127 198 for, 361 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Separate vote on paragraph 121 362 for, 188 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Separate vote on paragraph 111 375 for, 97 against, 101 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Separate vote on paragraph 85 357 for, 200 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 83 162 for, 367 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 78 175 for, 366 against, 33 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 3 195 for, 354 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 2 200 for, 353 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 1 204 for, 354 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Paragraph 78 — part 2 337 for, 218 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Paragraph 78 — part 1 387 for, 172 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 8 to paragraph 78 211 for, 360 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 45 156 for, 404 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 39 170 for, 398 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Separate vote on paragraph 38 346 for, 204 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 3 to paragraph 38 210 for, 357 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 1 to paragraph 36 224 for, 335 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 181 for, 380 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Separate vote on paragraph 9 385 for, 178 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Separate vote on paragraph 3 383 for, 170 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 367 for, 98 against, 113 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 204 for, 360 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 7 to recital K 325 for, 230 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Recital J — part 2 422 for, 54 against, 95 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Recital J — part 1 503 for, 14 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 329 for, 215 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 23 191 for, 378 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 23 178 for, 379 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 10 to paragraph 23 331 for, 221 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 9 to paragraph 21 286 for, 262 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 18 179 for, 395 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 5 to paragraph 17 190 for, 380 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Paragraph 16 — part 3 391 for, 175 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Paragraph 14 — part 2 378 for, 166 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Paragraph 14 — part 1 490 for, 30 against, 56 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
23 Oct 2025Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 12 307 for, 251 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jeroen LENAERS EPPNetherlands100 % of 3 759 shared89 %
Ingeborg TER LAAK EPPNetherlands100 % of 3 742 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania97 % of 3 594 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany97 % of 3 045 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 2 789 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany97 % of 2 955 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland97 % of 3 321 shared89 %
Christine SCHNEIDER Former memberEPPGermany97 % of 2 984 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania97 % of 3 093 shared89 %
Oliver SCHENK EPPGermany97 % of 3 686 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia89 % of 3 682 shared82 %
Andreas GLÜCK RenewGermany89 % of 2 345 shared82 %
Anouk VAN BRUG RenewNetherlands88 % of 2 316 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium88 % of 3 594 shared82 %
Bart GROOTHUIS RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 098 shared82 %
Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN RenewGermany88 % of 2 660 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany88 % of 3 672 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania88 % of 3 247 shared82 %
Malik AZMANI RenewNetherlands88 % of 3 737 shared82 %
Svenja HAHN RenewGermany88 % of 3 368 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

24 contributions recorded; 35 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 24 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 14

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
18 Dec 2025European commitment to small modular (maritime) nuclear reactors E-10-2025-005005Written question9 Mar 2026
18 Dec 2025Stop the Russian nickel trade via Rotterdam E-10-2025-005006Written question12 Feb 2026
17 Dec 2025Acquisitions of Notified Bodies by companies from third countries E-10-2025-004986Written question24 Feb 2026
23 Jul 2025Exemption for temporary construction emissions and depositions for sustainable projects P-10-2025-003051Priority written question3 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025Ensuring that demand meets supply in the CO<sub>2</sub> storage market E-10-2025-002712Written questionwith 1 co-author12 Sept 2025
10 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Clean Industrial Deal B-10-2025-0277Motion for a resolution—
5 Jun 2025Clean Industrial Deal O-10-2025-000020Oral questionNot yet answered
27 May 2025Increase in number of attacks with explosives in the Netherlands – Need for European action E-10-2025-002111Written questionwith 1 co-author31 Jul 2025
2 May 2025Apollo Vredestein workers fall victim to inadequate State aid rules P-10-2025-001790Priority written question18 Jun 2025
17 Mar 2025Tackling barriers to collecting road traffic fines and parking charges from foreign motorists E-10-2025-001123Written question2 Jun 2025

Show all 14 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tom BERENDSEN”. Member record. memberId 197778. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=24&vscope=all (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197778?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197778,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tom BERENDSEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=24&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?amendments=all&page=24&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197778. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}