Skip to content

Decision

Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan

Effect
Adopted
Result
show of hands — no count
Date
23 October 2025, 13:26–13:28
Kind
Resolution
More facts (8)
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Climate & environment Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
9 votes · 8 roll calls · 1 amendment
Requested by
Greens (1 roll call) · ECR (2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Patriots (1 roll call, 1 split vote)
Final vote
179941
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Show of hands — no count

Adopted.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 7 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted).

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches323 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site)no roll call
Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ CzechiaEPPSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site)no roll call
Tilly METZ LuxembourgGreensSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the groupno roll call
César LUENA SpainS&DSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the groupno roll call
Michal WIEZIK SlovakiaRenewSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the groupno roll call
Katri KULMUNI FinlandRenewSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site)no roll call
Show the other 8 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Manuela RIPA GermanyEPPSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site)no roll call
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA SpainEPPSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the groupno roll call
Aurelijus VERYGA LithuaniaECRSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the groupno roll call
Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT FrancePatriotsSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the groupno roll call
Sebastian EVERDING GermanyThe LeftSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site)no roll call
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site)no roll call
Martin GÜNTHER GermanyThe LeftSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site) · for the groupno roll call
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN FinlandEPPSpeeches122 Oct 2025 (verbatim report, official site)no roll call

All votes on this decision, 9

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Paragraph 54 — part 1 B10-0450/2025 – § 54/1 Part voted on: “Emphasises that the absence of a common EU framework for welfare provisions on the breeding, keeping and placing on the market of pet animal species other than dogs and cats, along with divergent national rules, leads to inconsistencies, gaps in enforcement, confusion for consumers and, often, serious animal welfare consequences for species that are unsuitable to be kept as pets, as well as risks to biodiversity, human health and safety, and nature conservation;”Roll call456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: ECR
2Paragraph 54 — part 2 B10-0450/2025 – § 54/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to swiftly propose an EU-wide positive list of animals allowed to be kept or traded as pets, based on recommendations from the study on the necessity, added value and feasibility of such a list, while taking into account scientific risk assessments and ecological criteria;”Roll call374 for, 122 against, 68 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 55 B10-0450/2025 – § 55 Roll call378 for, 127 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: ECR
Show the other 8 votesShow the other 6 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 54 — part 2 B10-0450/2025 – § 54/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to swiftly propose an EU-wide positive list of animals allowed to be kept or traded as pets, based on recommendations from the study on the necessity, added value and feasibility of such a list, while taking into account scientific risk assessments and ecological criteria;”Roll call374 for, 122 against, 68 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 55 B10-0450/2025 – § 55 Roll call378 for, 127 against, 63 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; separate: ECR
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 1 to paragraph 57 B10-0450/2025 – § 57 – Am 1 Roll call172 for, 368 against, 23 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Greens
5Paragraph 67 — part 1 B10-0450/2025 – § 67/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘which in its gravest form should be recognised as ecocide’”Roll call473 for, 51 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: Patriots
6Paragraph 67 — part 2 B10-0450/2025 – § 67/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call363 for, 173 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots, Greens; split: Patriots
7Paragraph 71 — part 1 B10-0450/2025 – § 71/1 Part voted on: “Calls on the Commission to ensure coordination in the implementation of the Environmental Crime Directive, the Wildlife Trade Regulation and the revised EU action plan against wildlife trafficking and other relevant EU policies such as the Digital Services Act;”Roll call439 for, 100 against, 29 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: ECR
8Paragraph 71 — part 2 B10-0450/2025 – § 71/2 Part voted on: “calls on the Member States to transpose the Environmental Crime Directive and to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive by 21 May 2026;”Roll call374 for, 149 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Greens; split: ECR
9Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Show of hands Adopted

Roll calls requested by Greens, Patriots · split votes by ECR (2), Patriots · separate votes by ECR.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2025-0450

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its position on the EU's strategic objectives for the 20th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, from 24 November to 5 December 2025.

The text calls for stronger protection of species like sharks, elephants, and eels, and for tackling wildlife crime and corruption linked to illegal trade.

It also urges the EU to push for stricter trade rules and better enforcement at the meeting.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution sets out Parliament's strategic objectives for the EU at the 20th CITES Conference of the Parties in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, from 24 November to 5 December 2025.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2618(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

The EU strategic objectives for the 20th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), to be held in to be held in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, from 24 November to 05 December 2025

Parliament adopted the text on 23 October 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 23 October 2025 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: ENVI · Authors: Manuela RIPA (EPP), César LUENA (S&D), MEP #257122 (S&D), Pietro FIOCCHI (ECR) and 3 more

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 8 connections: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on ENVI dossiers

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan”. Decision, 23 October 2025. votingId 179941, document B-10-2025-0450, reference 2025/2618(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-23/8 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-10-23-8,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-23/8}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-23/8},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 179941, document B-10-2025-0450, reference 2025/2618(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}