Member
Tineke STRIK
Greens · Netherlands
- Group
- Greens Verts/ALE
- Country
- Netherlands
- Roll-call participation
- 93.8 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
- With majority line
- 97.8 %ⓘ of 5 557 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 97.1 %
Record
The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.
Roll-call participation ⓘ
93.8 %
5 558 of 5 928 roll calls while in office
Greens median: 92.2 % (+1.6 pts)
Chamber median: 90.2 %
With majority line ⓘ
97.8 %
5 432 of 5 557 votes where their group had a line
Greens median: 97.1 % (+0.7 pts)
44 opposite (for ↔ against), 28 abstained against the line, 18 voted for or against when the line was to abstain
Data as a table
| Figure | Participation |
|---|---|
| Tineke STRIK | 93.8 % |
| Greens median | 92.2 % |
| Lowest in the group | 48.0 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.6 % |
| Members | 54 |
Data as a table
| Figure | With majority line |
|---|---|
| Tineke STRIK | 97.8 % |
| Greens median | 97.1 % |
| Lowest in the group | 87.9 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.4 % |
| Members | 54 |
- Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
- “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
- A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.
| Date | Decision and vote | Result | Position | Majority line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2024 | Maximum residue levels for cyproconazole Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 522 for, 127 against, 28 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 18 Sept 2024 | Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl Final vote on the motion for a resolution | Objection passed 516 for, 129 against, 27 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 16 Sept 2024 | Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group | 437 for, 13 against, 11 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: For |
| 16 Sept 2024 | Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group | 102 for, 279 against, 13 abstained | Position: No vote recorded | Majority line: Against |
| 18 Jul 2024 | Request by The Left Group – Motion for adjournment of the vote on the election of the President of the Commission Request by The Left Group — Motion for adjournment of the vote | 101 for, 531 against, 8 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 495 for, 137 against, 47 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Separate vote on recital E | 482 for, 165 against, 22 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 | 96 for, 537 against, 44 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 8 | 113 for, 497 against, 58 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 8 | 57 for, 427 against, 177 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 8 | 63 for, 564 against, 42 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 7 | 414 for, 193 against, 62 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 6 | 418 for, 168 against, 71 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 5 | 468 for, 119 against, 79 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 4 | 393 for, 178 against, 75 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 3 | 457 for, 133 against, 79 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 2 | 450 for, 165 against, 46 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 1 | 483 for, 153 against, 32 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 | 35 for, 583 against, 45 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 3 | 498 for, 111 against, 52 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 2 | 518 for, 47 against, 76 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 1 | 456 for, 166 against, 26 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 | 180 for, 436 against, 30 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 | 194 for, 400 against, 53 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 3 — part 1 | 476 for, 107 against, 42 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 17 Jul 2024 | The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 | 91 for, 468 against, 20 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group | 119 for, 337 against, 15 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 17 Jul 2024 | Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group | 149 for, 251 against, 16 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
Roll-call participation
One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.
"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
Data as a table
Voting neighbours
Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.
Work
Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.
Seats
| Body | Role | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee | Substitute | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee | Member | 6 Jul 2026 | now |
| Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee | Member | 19 Jul 2024 | now |
| Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committee | Substitute | 7 Nov 2024 | now |
| Delegation for relations with Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo, including the EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee and the EU-Kosovo Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeDSEE Delegation | Vice-chair | 30 Sept 2024 | now |
| Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly | Member | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly | Substitute | 19 Sept 2024 | now |
| Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group | Member | 16 Jan 2025 | now |
| Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group | Member | 19 Feb 2025 | now |
| Intergroup on the Two-State Solution for Israel and PalestineIG10-26 Intergroup / working group | Member | 29 Jan 2025 | now |
Dossiers
Topics they work on (model-assigned)
- Foreign affairs 79
- Justice, rule of law & rights 50
- Migration & asylum 48
- EU budget & funds 28
- Economy & single market 10
- Defence & security 9
- Digital, AI & data 8
- Jobs, social affairs & equality 6
- Trade & customs 6
- EU institutions & Parliament 3
- Transport & tourism 3
- Climate & environment 2
- Energy 2
Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.
In the chamber
Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.
54 contributions recorded; 19 on behalf of their group; 82 minutes of speaking time.
Questions and motions, 111
Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.
Amendments tabled in committee, 32
Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.
Connections
Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.
Political group
- Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism
National delegation
- Delegation Netherlands National delegation
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tineke STRIK”. Member record. memberId 197772. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197772?page=119&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197772. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197772?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197772,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Tineke STRIK}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197772?page=119&rows=all&vscope=all}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197772?page=119&rows=all&vscope=all},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Member record. memberId 197772. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197772. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}