Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 46 — part 2 to paragraph 4

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 46 — part 2 to paragraph 4
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
101 for · 550 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:50
More facts (6)
Position
vote 20 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 4 – Am 46/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172683
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 101 for, 550 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “is appalled by the apparent lack of condemnation by EU officials of such a blatant threat against the autonomous territory of a Member State;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 16Against 32Abst. 3No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
S&DFor 10Against 120Abst. 0No vote 6 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 1Against 68Abst. 1No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 3Against 173Abst. 0No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 4Against 63Abst. 5No vote 8 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 3Against 68Abst. 1No vote 14 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 2No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 21Against 5Abst. 2No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France700
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy900
Netherlands100
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment62 for, 540 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 575 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 9 to recital D Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment77 for, 520 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 605 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment65 for, 526 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 587 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment88 for, 520 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 593 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 7, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment78 for, 554 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 599 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 376 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment82 for, 530 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 603 voters
16 Jun 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther65 for, 338 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 15 %r · shared0.73 404 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 602 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 55 to paragraph 7 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment71 for, 540 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 603 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment90 for, 482 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 15 %r · shared0.72 548 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172683
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 46 — part 2 to paragraph 4 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172683, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172683 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172683,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 46 — part 2 to paragraph 4 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172683}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172683},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172683, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}