Skip to content

Member

Eugen TOMAC

Renew · Romania

Group
Renew
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
72.4 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
95.5 %ⓘ of 4 291 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 95.5 %
More facts (5)
National party
PMP Partidul Mișcarea Populară
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
151 of 4 177 votesⓘ
Committees
CULT, EMPL (substitute), PETI (substitute)
Member id
197672
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

72.4 %

4 292 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 90.4 % (−18.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.5 %

4 096 of 4 291 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 95.5 % (−0.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.6 %

151 of 4 177 votes where their group had a clear line

83 opposite (for ↔ against), 68 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.8 %

79 of 4 292 votes cast

Participation 72.4 % — Renew median 90.4 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Eugen TOMAC72.4 %
Renew median90.4 %
Lowest in the group65.3 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members76
With majority line 95.5 % — Renew median 95.5 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Eugen TOMAC95.5 %
Renew median95.5 %
Lowest in the group77.5 %
Highest in the group98.3 %
Members76
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 46 — part 2 406 for, 214 against, 29 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 46 — part 1 470 for, 117 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 3 334 for, 270 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 2 327 for, 272 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 45 — part 1 433 for, 153 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 44 349 for, 228 against, 79 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 43 — part 2 340 for, 285 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 43 — part 1 358 for, 210 against, 81 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Separate vote on paragraph 41 362 for, 214 against, 75 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 24 — part 2 337 for, 303 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 24 — part 1 532 for, 42 against, 82 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 21 — part 2 433 for, 135 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 21 — part 1 548 for, 37 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 215 for, 294 against, 144 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19 278 for, 304 against, 69 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 3 399 for, 182 against, 72 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 2 299 for, 354 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 18 — part 1 435 for, 197 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 4 353 for, 224 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 3 330 for, 256 against, 57 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 2 339 for, 302 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 16 — part 1 539 for, 20 against, 88 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 3 388 for, 169 against, 88 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 2 472 for, 133 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 8 — part 1 501 for, 61 against, 74 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 194 for, 309 against, 145 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 6 — part 5 342 for, 280 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 6 — part 4 601 for, 46 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 3 — part 2 490 for, 141 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Paragraph 3 — part 1 406 for, 200 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026An EU cardiovascular diseases strategy Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 545 for, 47 against, 75 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 470 for, 129 against, 62 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 6, adding text after recital F 213 for, 426 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 218 for, 434 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 220 for, 432 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 64 175 for, 438 against, 50 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 9 to paragraph 64 205 for, 442 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 216 for, 439 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 231 for, 426 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Nuclear decommissioning assistance programme of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania for the period 2028-2034 Final votePassed 625 for, 20 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026EU-Norway Agreement on the participation of Norway in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 612 for, 8 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation 2028-2034 Final votePassed 600 for, 21 against, 48 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026EU-Iceland Agreement on the participation of Iceland in GOVSATCOM and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 631 for, 7 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026EU-Switzerland Agreement on the transfer of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 549 for, 75 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026EU-UK Agreement regarding cooperation on the application of their respective competition laws Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 640 for, 5 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Final votePassed 496 for, 53 against, 125 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 86 to Article 9, paragraph 2 131 for, 532 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 85, adding text after Article 8 138 for, 532 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 Amendment 84 to Article 4, after paragraph 1 168 for, 505 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 530 for, 125 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 44 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table
Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
SittingRoll callsVoted in
17 Jul 20242321
18 Jul 202410
16 Sept 202420
18 Sept 202420
19 Sept 2024920
7 Oct 202420
8 Oct 202411
9 Oct 20241816
10 Oct 202440
21 Oct 202420
22 Oct 20241010
23 Oct 2024129116
24 Oct 2024130
13 Nov 202420
14 Nov 20243636
25 Nov 202420
26 Nov 2024180
27 Nov 2024110
28 Nov 2024570
17 Dec 20241313
18 Dec 20243333
19 Dec 20244544
20 Jan 202520
21 Jan 202511
22 Jan 202522
23 Jan 2025450
10 Feb 202511
11 Feb 20253231
12 Feb 20251010
13 Feb 20253030
10 Mar 202522
11 Mar 202599
12 Mar 2025228226
13 Mar 20252424
31 Mar 202530
1 Apr 20253534
2 Apr 2025251239
3 Apr 20256261
5 May 202550
6 May 2025100
7 May 2025220216
8 May 20251030
21 May 202520
22 May 2025530
16 Jun 202520
17 Jun 20254127
18 Jun 20259190
19 Jun 20258781
7 Jul 202510
8 Jul 20255555
9 Jul 2025134131
10 Jul 2025360
8 Sept 202510
9 Sept 2025101101
10 Sept 20253434
11 Sept 20256967
6 Oct 202520
7 Oct 202555
8 Oct 20255555
9 Oct 20256564
20 Oct 202530
21 Oct 20251313
22 Oct 2025186184
23 Oct 20255549
13 Nov 20252670
24 Nov 202530
25 Nov 2025750
26 Nov 202510098
27 Nov 2025125122
15 Dec 202540
16 Dec 20256646
17 Dec 20254332
18 Dec 20254242
20 Jan 20266764
21 Jan 2026112108
22 Jan 20265858
9 Feb 202620
10 Feb 20263837
11 Feb 20261313
12 Feb 2026141137
24 Feb 20264343
9 Mar 202610
10 Mar 2026197193
11 Mar 20266059
12 Mar 2026340
25 Mar 202633
26 Mar 20266969
27 Apr 202620
28 Apr 2026225225
29 Apr 20262960
30 Apr 2026680
18 May 202640
19 May 202633
20 May 20269692
21 May 20269892
15 Jun 202620
16 Jun 2026400
17 Jun 20261270
18 Jun 2026770
6 Jul 202620
7 Jul 20267272
8 Jul 2026144139
9 Jul 20266766
14 Sept 202610
15 Sept 2026155149
16 Sept 20268077
17 Sept 2026124121

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dan BARNA RenewRomania95 % of 3 967 shared92 %
Stine BOSSE RenewDenmark95 % of 4 195 shared92 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania95 % of 4 010 shared92 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia94 % of 3 833 shared92 %
Taner KABILOV changed group ECRBulgaria94 % of 285 shared92 %
Nikola MINCHEV RenewBulgaria94 % of 4 075 shared92 %
Michał KOBOSKO RenewPoland94 % of 3 892 shared92 %
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS RenewLithuania94 % of 4 270 shared92 %
Ilhan KYUCHYUK RenewBulgaria94 % of 3 941 shared92 %
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON RenewFinland94 % of 3 901 shared92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dan NICA S&DRomania89 % of 2 965 shared86 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany89 % of 3 370 shared82 %
Isabel WISELER-LIMA EPPLuxembourg88 % of 4 232 shared82 %
Liesbet SOMMEN EPPBelgium88 % of 4 151 shared82 %
Martine KEMP EPPLuxembourg88 % of 3 676 shared82 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland88 % of 3 772 shared82 %
Dragoş BENEA S&DRomania88 % of 2 702 shared86 %
Andi CRISTEA S&DRomania88 % of 3 867 shared86 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany88 % of 3 876 shared82 %
Wouter BEKE EPPBelgium88 % of 4 200 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-RS Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationSubstitute15 Dec 2025now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Cancer and Rare DiseasesIG10-05 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Jan 2025now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202422 Jan 2025
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationMember19 Sept 202414 Dec 2025

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.'Shadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL11 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationPETI13 Apr 2026
A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningShadow rapporteurCULT19 Dec 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL19 Dec 2025
12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, scheduled to take place in Yerevan, Armenia on 28-30 October 2025.Official delegationDEPA30 Sept 2025
Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Shadow rapporteur for an opinionPETI9 Sept 2025
12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest PAOfficial delegationDEPA9 Sept 2025
Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Shadow rapporteurPETI9 Sept 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurPETI30 Jun 2025
Member of the Delegation.Official delegationD-MD24 Jun 2025

Show all 16 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 20

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Mar 2026Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular Africans, for Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0170Motion for a resolutionwith 21 co-authors—
17 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy B-10-2025-0466Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
15 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections B-10-2025-0452Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors—
6 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a united response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure B-10-2025-0422Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—
3 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interference B-10-2025-0356Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
2 Jul 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians B-10-2025-0307Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
16 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The situation of media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli B-10-2025-0287Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors—
6 Jun 2025Romania’s adoption of the euro E-10-2025-002293Written question30 Jul 2025
5 May 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia B-10-2025-0252Motion for a resolutionwith 22 co-authors—

Show all 20 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 27

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 27 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

  • Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Eugen TOMAC”. Member record. memberId 197672. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197672?page=4&scope=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197672. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197672?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197672,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Eugen TOMAC}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197672?page=4&scope=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197672?page=4&scope=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197672. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197672. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}