Skip to content

Member

Eugen TOMAC

Renew · Romania

Group
Renew
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
69.8 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
96.8 %ⓘ of 432 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 93.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
PMP Partidul Mișcarea Populară
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
3 of 402 votesⓘ
Committees
CULT, EMPL (substitute), PETI (substitute)
Member id
197672
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

69.8 %

433 of 620 final votes while in office

Renew median: 91.5 % (−21.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.8 %

418 of 432 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 93.6 % (+3.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

3 of 402 votes where their group had a clear line

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 2 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.5 %

2 of 433 votes cast

Participation 69.8 % — Renew median 91.5 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Eugen TOMAC69.8 %
Renew median91.5 %
Lowest in the group64.4 %
Highest in the group99.7 %
Members76
With majority line 96.8 % — Renew median 93.6 %, 76 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Eugen TOMAC96.8 %
Renew median93.6 %
Lowest in the group79.8 %
Highest in the group97.6 %
Members76
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 24 to paragraph 37 114 for, 491 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 23 to paragraph 36 228 for, 384 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 34 201 for, 429 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 34 192 for, 436 against, 16 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 34 207 for, 432 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 22 to paragraph 34 190 for, 437 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 33 159 for, 474 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 20 to paragraph 33 88 for, 491 against, 87 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 11 to paragraph 16 190 for, 470 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 5 108 for, 548 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report) Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 122 for, 534 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement Final voteConsent given 479 for, 119 against, 65 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026Lead in certain fishing tackle Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection failed 197 for, 455 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Final vote — text as a wholeObjection passed 388 for, 248 against, 24 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Amendment 3, adding text after recital M 204 for, 455 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Amendment 2, adding text after recital G 190 for, 464 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Amendment 1 to recital B 201 for, 464 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Amendment 7 to paragraph 3, introductory part 188 for, 465 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 189 for, 465 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 188 for, 462 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 188 for, 456 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 390 for, 86 against, 134 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2026 High-Level Political Forum Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 374 for, 185 against, 74 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 447 for, 128 against, 78 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Paragraph 43 — part 2 464 for, 177 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Separate vote on paragraph 35 473 for, 174 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 33 189 for, 456 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Paragraph 27 — part 2 497 for, 138 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Paragraph 16 — part 2 465 for, 143 against, 35 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Separate vote on paragraph 14 455 for, 151 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 191 for, 455 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Separate vote on paragraph 9 461 for, 121 against, 74 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 164 for, 461 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Amendment 2 to paragraph 6 184 for, 464 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Separate vote on paragraph 3 448 for, 188 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning Amendment 1 to paragraph 3 192 for, 454 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 418 for, 152 against, 85 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector Amendment 6 to paragraph 35 279 for, 333 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 210 for, 393 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector Amendment 4 to paragraph 33 214 for, 389 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sector Amendment 3 to paragraph 27 283 for, 341 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 501 for, 61 against, 95 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Separate vote on paragraph 54 600 for, 27 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 169 for, 456 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 50 108 for, 468 against, 77 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 46 139 for, 369 against, 144 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 136 for, 463 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 41 110 for, 435 against, 109 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 13 118 for, 510 against, 25 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
7 Jul 2026Competition policy – annual report 2025 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 118 for, 492 against, 40 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 20 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dan BARNA RenewRomania95 % of 3 967 shared92 %
Stine BOSSE RenewDenmark95 % of 4 195 shared92 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania95 % of 4 010 shared92 %
Marjan ŠAREC RenewSlovenia94 % of 3 833 shared92 %
Taner KABILOV changed group ECRBulgaria94 % of 285 shared92 %
Nikola MINCHEV RenewBulgaria94 % of 4 075 shared92 %
Michał KOBOSKO RenewPoland94 % of 3 892 shared92 %
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS RenewLithuania94 % of 4 270 shared92 %
Ilhan KYUCHYUK RenewBulgaria94 % of 3 941 shared92 %
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON RenewFinland94 % of 3 901 shared92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Dan NICA S&DRomania89 % of 2 965 shared86 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany89 % of 3 370 shared82 %
Isabel WISELER-LIMA EPPLuxembourg88 % of 4 232 shared82 %
Liesbet SOMMEN EPPBelgium88 % of 4 151 shared82 %
Martine KEMP EPPLuxembourg88 % of 3 676 shared82 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland88 % of 3 772 shared82 %
Dragoş BENEA S&DRomania88 % of 2 702 shared86 %
Andi CRISTEA S&DRomania88 % of 3 867 shared86 %
Alexandra MEHNERT EPPGermany88 % of 3 876 shared82 %
Wouter BEKE EPPBelgium88 % of 4 200 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation to the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-RS Joint parliamentary committeeMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationSubstitute15 Dec 2025now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on Cancer and Rare DiseasesIG10-05 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Jan 2025now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202422 Jan 2025
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationMember19 Sept 202414 Dec 2025

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.'Shadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL11 Jun 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationPETI13 Apr 2026
A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningShadow rapporteurCULT19 Dec 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteur for an opinionEMPL19 Dec 2025
12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, scheduled to take place in Yerevan, Armenia on 28-30 October 2025.Official delegationDEPA30 Sept 2025
Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Shadow rapporteur for an opinionPETI9 Sept 2025
12th Ordinary Session of the Euronest PAOfficial delegationDEPA9 Sept 2025
Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Shadow rapporteurPETI9 Sept 2025
No dossier namedShadow rapporteurPETI30 Jun 2025
Member of the Delegation.Official delegationD-MD24 Jun 2025

Show all 16 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 25 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 20

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
11 Mar 2026Financing EU priorities in a sustainable, predictable and resilient way through a new EU own resource from the online gambling and betting services sector O-10-2026-000014Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
9 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular Africans, for Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0170Motion for a resolutionwith 21 co-authors—
17 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedy B-10-2025-0466Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
15 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections B-10-2025-0452Motion for a resolutionwith 11 co-authors—
6 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on a united response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure B-10-2025-0422Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—
3 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian hybrid threats and malign interference B-10-2025-0356Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
2 Jul 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians B-10-2025-0307Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors—
16 Jun 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The situation of media freedom in Georgia, particularly the case of Mzia Amaglobeli B-10-2025-0287Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors—
6 Jun 2025Romania’s adoption of the euro E-10-2025-002293Written question30 Jul 2025
5 May 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia B-10-2025-0252Motion for a resolutionwith 22 co-authors—

Show all 20 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 27

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 27 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

  • Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Eugen TOMAC”. Member record. memberId 197672. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197672?page=12&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197672. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197672?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197672,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Eugen TOMAC}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197672?page=12&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197672?page=12&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197672. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197672. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}