Skip to content

Member

Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN

EPP · Romania

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Romania
Roll-call participation
81.3 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
97.6 %ⓘ of 504 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
PNL Partidul Naţional Liberal
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
5 of 478 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (vice-chair), CULT (substitute), ENVI, LIBE, PETI (substitute)
Member id
197636
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

81.3 %

504 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−9.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.6 %

492 of 504 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.0 %

5 of 478 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 2 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.4 %

2 of 504 votes cast

Participation 81.3 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN81.3 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 97.6 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN97.6 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 19 — part 2 518 for, 87 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 17 — part 2 440 for, 156 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 7 486 for, 119 against, 20 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 6 431 for, 132 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 5 553 for, 34 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 4 424 for, 157 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 3 526 for, 79 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 2 466 for, 133 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 16 — part 1 577 for, 44 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 27 to paragraph 16 131 for, 483 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 26 to paragraph 15 123 for, 486 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 69 to paragraph 14 119 for, 483 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 83, adding text after paragraph 13 127 for, 482 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 13 127 for, 486 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 13 — part 4 462 for, 101 against, 63 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 13 — part 3 540 for, 69 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 13 — part 2 443 for, 87 against, 96 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Separate vote on paragraph 12 437 for, 156 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 7 439 for, 160 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 6 516 for, 40 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 5 545 for, 29 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 4 477 for, 120 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 3 451 for, 147 against, 24 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 2 329 for, 260 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 11 — part 1 565 for, 39 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 10 97 for, 494 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 99, adding text after paragraph 4 193 for, 419 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 98, adding text after paragraph 4 155 for, 431 against, 34 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 97, adding text after paragraph 4 173 for, 423 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 96, adding text after paragraph 4 177 for, 431 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 92 for, 491 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 4 — part 2 516 for, 79 against, 33 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 3 128 for, 471 against, 27 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 3 127 for, 476 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 3 122 for, 484 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 3 133 for, 476 against, 21 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Paragraph 3 — part 1 468 for, 123 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 63, adding text before paragraph 1 128 for, 482 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing Amendment 24, adding text before paragraph 1 140 for, 478 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 493 for, 92 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 441 for, 105 against, 81 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Establishing an EU talent pool Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 414 for, 182 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Establishing an EU talent pool Proposal to vote on amendments 160 for, 462 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Establishing an EU talent pool Proposal to reject the text 156 for, 462 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Mar 2026Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 498 for, 90 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Mar 2026Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law Proposal to vote on amendments 164 for, 447 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Mar 2026Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group 87 for, 291 against, 22 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 437 for, 82 against, 70 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine Amendment 20, adding text after recital F 263 for, 273 against, 50 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
24 Feb 2026Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine Paragraph 23 — part 2 404 for, 131 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 18 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany97 % of 4 023 shared89 %
Virgil-Daniel POPESCU EPPRomania96 % of 4 500 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland96 % of 4 477 shared89 %
Daniel BUDA EPPRomania96 % of 4 879 shared89 %
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA EPPRomania96 % of 3 994 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany96 % of 4 040 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania96 % of 4 859 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania95 % of 4 276 shared89 %
Gheorghe FALCĂ EPPRomania95 % of 4 449 shared89 %
Mika AALTOLA EPPFinland95 % of 4 271 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia87 % of 4 683 shared82 %
Eugen TOMAC RenewRomania87 % of 3 689 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania87 % of 4 436 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium86 % of 4 818 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia86 % of 3 908 shared82 %
Jérémy DECERLE RenewFrance86 % of 2 405 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium86 % of 4 694 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland85 % of 3 964 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland85 % of 4 886 shared82 %
Moritz KÖRNER RenewGermany85 % of 4 886 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeVice-chair23 Jul 2024now
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeMember27 Apr 2026now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeMember23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY DelegationMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with Iraq, including the EU-Iraq Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-IQ DelegationChair16 Oct 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now

Show all 15 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedOfficial delegationEUDS29 Apr 2025
No dossier namedDelegation chairD-IQ30 Sept 2024
No dossier namedCommittee vice-chairAFET22 Jul 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

21 contributions recorded, 7 written statements; 24 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 21 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 63

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
9 Sept 2026Public procurement reform: Higher bills for councils and backroom negotiations? E-10-2026-003593Written questionNot yet answered
9 Sept 2026Why is Brussels funding projects in the North Pole, when Romania has the available graphite and infrastructure? E-10-2026-003584Written questionNot yet answered
13 Aug 2026Impact of AI on reading and interest in books in Europe E-10-2026-003275Written questionNot yet answered
11 Aug 2026Shortcomings in the application of the Digital Services Act in cases where disinformation goes viral pose a risk to citizens’ safety E-10-2026-003251Written questionNot yet answered
24 Jul 2026Risks of new electrification targets on infrastructure and citizens E-10-2026-003117Written questionNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026German Ambassador to Moldova offends Romanians P-10-2026-002929Priority written question10 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026Mandatory ceilings for data centre water consumption and impact of AI infrastructure E-10-2026-002764Written question26 Aug 2026
3 Jul 2026Safeguards for operational neutrality and protection of Romania’s strategic economic interests E-10-2026-002763Written questionNot yet answered
3 Jul 2026Will the Commission’s new omnibus proposals simplify rules for Romanian businesses or saddle them with hidden costs? E-10-2026-002762Written question21 Sept 2026
16 Jun 2026Impact of the ban on exports of sheep from Romania E-10-2026-002482Written question21 Aug 2026

Show all 63 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 65

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789899 CULT6
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789968 CULT1
12 Jun 2026Establishing the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/878988 CULT-AM-789967 CULT1
5 Jun 2026Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898 ITRE5
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788939 ITRE37
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788924 ITRE28
19 May 2026Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation Fund ENVI-AM-788820 ENVI2
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788941 ITRE16
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788940 ITRE45
19 May 2026Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788922 ITRE36

Show all 65 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN”. Member record. memberId 197636. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=41&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197636. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197636?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197636,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=41&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197636?page=41&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197636. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197636. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}