Skip to content

Member

Isabel WISELER-LIMA

EPP · Luxembourg

Group
EPP PPE
Country
Luxembourg
Roll-call participation
95.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line
94.3 %ⓘ of 593 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %
More facts (5)
National party
CSV Parti chrétien social luxembourgeois
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
11 of 559 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (substitute), LIBE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id
197421
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.6 %

593 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (+5.1 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.3 %

559 of 593 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (−1.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.0 %

11 of 559 votes where their group had a clear line

8 opposite (for ↔ against), 3 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.0 %

6 of 593 votes cast

Participation 95.6 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Isabel WISELER-LIMA95.6 %
EPP median90.6 %
Lowest in the group18.4 %
Highest in the group99.8 %
Members192
With majority line 94.3 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Isabel WISELER-LIMA94.3 %
EPP median95.6 %
Lowest in the group67.8 %
Highest in the group99.0 %
Members192
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
16 Sept 2026Defence readiness and facilitating defence investments and conditions for the defence industry (Omnibus V) Proposal to reject the text 102 for, 543 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 540 for, 105 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2026Acceleration of permit-granting for defence readiness projects (Omnibus V) Proposal to reject the text 95 for, 546 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
16 Sept 2026Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V) Final vote on the provisional agreementPassed 549 for, 92 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 477 for, 124 against, 66 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Global role of the euro Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 405 for, 146 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 49 217 for, 431 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 40 91 for, 448 against, 124 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 36 117 for, 439 against, 109 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 36 81 for, 532 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 159 for, 372 against, 136 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 Amendment 6 to paragraph 25 209 for, 447 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 530 for, 77 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 10 to paragraph 88 157 for, 458 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 9 to paragraph 87 193 for, 465 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Paragraph 83 — part 3 448 for, 154 against, 60 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Paragraph 83 — part 2 451 for, 147 against, 67 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Paragraph 83 — part 1 518 for, 74 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 2 to paragraph 75 529 for, 110 against, 25 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 194 for, 467 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 57 200 for, 461 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 332 for, 300 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 6 to paragraph 54 132 for, 468 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 52 187 for, 452 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 336 for, 266 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 183 for, 454 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 420 for, 220 against, 26 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 80 to recital CL 153 for, 450 against, 60 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 78 to recital BZ 83 for, 513 against, 55 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 56, adding text after Recital BT 502 for, 90 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Recital BT — part 2 459 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Separate vote on recital AU 461 for, 193 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 1, adding text after Recital AB 204 for, 459 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Recital J — part 2 465 for, 134 against, 64 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Separate vote on recital B 555 for, 94 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 11, adding text after citation 70 218 for, 406 against, 39 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 132 204 for, 437 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 132 177 for, 456 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 115 203 for, 436 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 86 to paragraph 115 247 for, 398 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 2 118 for, 448 against, 89 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 1 287 for, 366 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Separate vote on paragraph 108 503 for, 108 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 107 193 for, 459 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 104 217 for, 435 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 104 193 for, 454 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 101 201 for, 447 against, 15 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Paragraph 101 — part 5 431 for, 181 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Paragraph 101 — part 4 459 for, 195 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield Paragraph 101 — part 3 463 for, 194 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Martine KEMP EPPLuxembourg99 % of 4 765 shared89 %
Sandra KALNIETE EPPLatvia97 % of 5 266 shared89 %
Manfred WEBER EPPGermany96 % of 4 523 shared89 %
Siegfried MUREŞAN EPPRomania96 % of 5 517 shared89 %
Axel VOSS EPPGermany96 % of 4 455 shared89 %
Pekka TOVERI EPPFinland96 % of 5 023 shared89 %
Sven SIMON EPPGermany96 % of 4 580 shared89 %
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ EPPLithuania96 % of 4 695 shared89 %
Mika AALTOLA EPPFinland96 % of 4 787 shared89 %
Inese VAIDERE EPPLatvia96 % of 5 425 shared89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Urmas PAET RenewEstonia90 % of 5 173 shared82 %
Dan BARNA RenewRomania90 % of 5 002 shared82 %
Hilde VAUTMANS RenewBelgium89 % of 5 503 shared82 %
Ilhan KYUCHYUK RenewBulgaria89 % of 5 267 shared82 %
Katri KULMUNI RenewFinland89 % of 4 468 shared82 %
Olivier CHASTEL RenewBelgium89 % of 5 130 shared82 %
Ivars IJABS RenewLatvia88 % of 4 324 shared82 %
Grégory ALLIONE RenewFrance88 % of 4 877 shared82 %
Elsi KATAINEN RenewFinland88 % of 5 574 shared82 %
Michał KOBOSKO RenewPoland88 % of 5 195 shared82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI SubcommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute10 Sept 2026now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committeeSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Intergroup on European Cultural Heritage, Ways of Saint James and other European Cultural RoutesIG10-11 Intergroup / working groupMember29 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 202521 Apr 2026

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sectionsShadow rapporteur for an opinionSEDE16 Jul 2026
Human Rights and Democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2026RapporteurAFET15 Jul 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationLIBE21 May 2026
91st EU-US inter-parliamentary meeting of the Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue, 19-20 June 2026, Nicosia, CyprusOfficial delegationD-US21 May 2026
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDROI16 Dec 2025
Human Rights and Democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Shadow rapporteurAFET9 Sept 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDROI2 Sept 2025
Participation in the mission of the D-US Delegation to the Transatlantic Legislators' dialogue in Warsaw 14-15 June 2025Official delegationD-US3 Jun 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDROI14 May 2025
No dossier namedOfficial delegationDROI20 Feb 2025

Show all 12 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

36 contributions recorded; 6 on behalf of their group; 63 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
14 Sept 2026Government crackdown on the LGBTIQ+ Community in Türkiye: Türkiye’s compliance with its international commitments on non-discrimination (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
16 Jun 20262025 Commission report on Türkiye (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead
20 May 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
19 May 2026EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
28 Apr 2026Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
10 Feb 2026European response to the attacks on the Ukrainian energy system causing a humanitarian crisis (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Building a stronger European defence in light of an increasingly volatile international environment (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 (debate) on behalf of EPPSpeech · 2 minRead

Show all 36 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 96

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors—
14 Sept 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
10 Sept 2026Sexual exploitation of children in travel and tourism: closing the gaps beyond the EU’s borders E-10-2026-003633Written questionwith 11 co-authorsNot yet answered
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0350Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
6 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0321Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
16 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors—
15 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0292Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors—
10 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recruitment of children by organised crime B-10-2026-0275Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors—

Show all 96 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 15

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 15 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Isabel WISELER-LIMA”. Member record. memberId 197421. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197421?page=5&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197421. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197421?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-197421,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Isabel WISELER-LIMA}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197421?page=5&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197421?page=5&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197421. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197421. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}