Member

Stefan BERGER

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 85.0 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 97.7 %ⓘ of 527 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 8 of 490 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON, ITRE (substitute)
Member id: 197410

National party: CDU Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 8 of 490 votesⓘ
Committees: ECON, ITRE (substitute)
Member id: 197410

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.0 %

527 of 620 final votes while in office

EPP median: 90.6 % (−5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.7 %

515 of 527 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.6 % (+2.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.6 %

8 of 490 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 4 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.9 %

5 of 527 votes cast

Participation 85.0 % — EPP median 90.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Stefan BERGER	85.0 %
EPP median	90.6 %
Lowest in the group	18.4 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	192

With majority line 97.7 % — EPP median 95.6 %, 192 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 192 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Stefan BERGER	97.7 %
EPP median	95.6 %
Lowest in the group	67.8 %
Highest in the group	99.0 %
Members	192

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point v — part 1	417 for, 138 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 7	381 for, 118 against, 36 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 6	357 for, 134 against, 53 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 5	343 for, 154 against, 59 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 4	351 for, 141 against, 68 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 3	391 for, 116 against, 54 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 2	338 for, 147 against, 66 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point u — part 1	423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point s — part 2	182 for, 369 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point s — part 1	392 for, 153 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, point s	128 for, 376 against, 55 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 2	343 for, 146 against, 68 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point r — part 1	386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 2	275 for, 252 against, 35 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point q — part 1	373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p	470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point o	179 for, 368 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point n — part 2	280 for, 265 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point n — part 1	415 for, 97 against, 54 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point k — part 2	240 for, 316 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point k — part 1	420 for, 88 against, 56 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on paragraph 1, point j	533 for, 28 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point h — part 2	286 for, 237 against, 45 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point h — part 1	386 for, 120 against, 61 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point g — part 2	255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point g — part 1	464 for, 33 against, 76 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point f	200 for, 230 against, 129 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point b	201 for, 248 against, 114 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Abstained
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, point a	104 for, 398 against, 59 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 332 for, 209 against, 33 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on recital O	257 for, 297 against, 25 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on recital N	270 for, 287 against, 23 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 2	258 for, 290 against, 28 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 19 — part 1	447 for, 102 against, 30 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14	239 for, 299 against, 41 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11	210 for, 349 against, 20 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 2	254 for, 315 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 11 — part 1	491 for, 43 against, 45 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 2	246 for, 318 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 8 — part 1	470 for, 64 against, 46 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 2	250 for, 310 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Paragraph 4 — part 1	467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3	211 for, 358 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights Separate vote on paragraph 3	253 for, 321 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG	265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 2	269 for, 302 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital O — part 1	397 for, 133 against, 49 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 2	220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy Recital D — part 1	426 for, 72 against, 82 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	0
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	1
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	4
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	0
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	18
8 May 2025	12	12
22 May 2025	6	6
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	6
19 Jun 2025	6	0
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	13
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	5
10 Sept 2025	15	14
11 Sept 2025	8	6
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	10
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	7
22 Oct 2025	6	5
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	12
25 Nov 2025	13	12
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	10
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	7
22 Jan 2026	8	7
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	9
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	10
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	13
28 Apr 2026	14	12
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	0
19 May 2026	3	0
20 May 2026	12	0
21 May 2026	10	0
16 Jun 2026	10	9
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	13
8 Jul 2026	15	12
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	11
16 Sept 2026	16	14
17 Sept 2026	10	9

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 3 858 shared	89 %
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	98 % of 3 129 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 864 shared	89 %
Select Hildegard BENTELE	Hildegard BENTELE	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 423 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 116 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 392 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 549 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 474 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 801 shared	89 %
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 039 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	89 % of 4 407 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	88 % of 3 880 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	88 % of 4 292 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	87 % of 4 759 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	87 % of 3 699 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	87 % of 3 474 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	87 % of 4 768 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	87 % of 3 614 shared	82 %
Select Jeannette BALJEU	Jeannette BALJEU	Renew	Netherlands	87 % of 4 342 shared	82 %
Select Moritz KÖRNER	Moritz KÖRNER	Renew	Germany	87 % of 4 843 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now

Show all 4 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	18 Nov 2025
European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	10 Nov 2025
Non-financial commercial real estate statistics	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	10 Jun 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

2 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 4 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
10 Mar 2026	European Semester (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
12 Feb 2025	Collaboration between conservatives and far right as a threat for competitiveness in the EU (topical debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
22 Oct 2024	Security-related concerns regarding current EU customs scanning equipment and the Customs Control Equipment Instrument funds E-10-2024-002220	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	5 Jan 2025
19 Sept 2024	Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	17 Dec 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
23 Apr 2026	Establishment of European Business Wallets ITRE-AM-787818	ITRE	74
23 Apr 2026	Establishment of European Business Wallets ITRE-AM-787816	ITRE	77
24 Mar 2026	Digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system ECON-AM-786707	ECON	18
19 Dec 2025	Establishment of the digital euro ECON-AM-781501	ECON	9
19 Dec 2025	Establishment of the digital euro ECON-AM-781235	ECON	10
19 Dec 2025	Establishment of the digital euro ECON-AM-781499	ECON	19
19 Dec 2025	Establishment of the digital euro ECON-AM-781500	ECON	35
17 Dec 2025	European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026 ECON-AM-781495	ECON	26
5 Nov 2025	Non-financial commercial real estate statistics ECON-AM-779504	ECON	22
23 Jul 2025	Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 CJ49-AM-775766	CJ49	9

Show all 18 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Stefan BERGER”. Member record. memberId 197410. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197410. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197410?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197410,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Stefan BERGER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197410?page=44&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197410. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197410. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 2

Amendments tabled in committee, 18

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928