Decision

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament

Effect: Discharge decision adopted
Result: show of hands — no count
Date: 29 April 2026, 13:30–13:44
Kind: Budget decision

More facts (9)

Counts are for: the proposal for a discharge decision
Text: Report A-10-2026-0081
Dossier: 2025/2146(DEC)
Source: Committee report by Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy
Topics: EU budget & funds Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 97 votes · 26 roll calls · 21 amendments
Requested by: Greens (1 roll call, 2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · EPP (5 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ECR (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call, 8 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Members (1 roll call)
Sitting: Wednesday 29 April 2026
Final vote: 191884

Counts are for: the proposal for a discharge decision
Text: Report A-10-2026-0081
Dossier: 2025/2146(DEC)
Source: Committee report by Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy
Topics: EU budget & funds Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes: 97 votes · 26 roll calls · 21 amendments
Requested by: Greens (1 roll call, 2 split votes, 1 separate vote) · S&D (1 roll call) · Renew (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · EPP (5 split votes, 1 separate vote) · ECR (1 roll call) · Patriots (1 roll call, 8 split votes, 1 separate vote) · Members (1 roll call)
Sitting: Wednesday 29 April 2026
Final vote: 191884

Cite this page Results of votes (EP)

Link to this page

Votes on this decision

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Show of hands — no count

Discharge decision adopted.

Parliament voted on its discharge decision for this budget; whether discharge was granted, refused or postponed is set out in the report.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 21 amendments (21 rejected) and 74 parts of the text voted on separately (35 adopted, 39 rejected).

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. **Speeches**: how many times they took the floor. **Final vote**: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
Member	Group	Speeches	Spoke	Final vote
Roberta METSOLA Malta	EPP	Speeches1	29 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	no roll call
Arno BAUSEMER Germany	ESN	Speeches1	29 Apr 2026 (verbatim report, official site)	no roll call

All votes on this decision, 97

In voting order. **Result**: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
1	Final vote Proposal for a decision	Show of hands	Adopted
2	Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 1 – Am 27	Roll call	138 for, 443 against, 71 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
3	Separate vote on paragraph 6	Show of hands	Rejected

Show the other 96 votesShow the other 94 votes

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
2	Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 1 – Am 27	Roll call	138 for, 443 against, 71 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
3	Separate vote on paragraph 6	Show of hands	Rejected

Votes on this decision, continued
No.	Vote	Recorded	Result	Requested by
4	Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 7 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 7 – Am 29	Roll call	199 for, 451 against, 5 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
5	Separate vote on paragraph 10	Show of hands	Rejected
6	Amendment 31 to paragraph 11 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 11 – Am 31	Roll call	130 for, 447 against, 75 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
7	Amendment 32 to paragraph 12 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 12 – Am 32	Roll call	133 for, 445 against, 75 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
8	Separate vote on paragraph 19	Show of hands	Rejected
9	Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Recalls that the Union budget may be awarded to European political parties in view of their contribution to forming European political awareness and to expressing the political will of the citizens of the Union; notes that the Court audited one transaction, where it considered the expenditure ineligible, and found that Parliament’s administration was of the same opinion and had taken steps to recover the related expenditure; welcomes the conduct of Parliament’s administration in that regard,’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
10	Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “and in particular its commitment to applying a horizontal approach, guaranteeing equal treatment of all political parties;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
11	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 23	Show of hands	Rejected
12	Paragraph 21 — part 1 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 21/1 Part voted on: ‘Stresses that Parliament’s administration has transmitted the case file and cooperates fully with the EPPO’s investigation; notes that the Bureau awaits to know the outcome of the EPPO’s investigation before taking any recovery action; calls upon the Bureau to provide Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control a written update on the state of play before the next discharge cycle starts; calls on Parliament’s administration to take all the necessary measures parallel to the EPPO’s criminal investigation, administrative interim protective measures (including precautionary set-offs and/or reserves, where legally feasible) to protect the Union’s financial interests and Parliament’s reputation; considers that, according to Article 3(3) of the Working Arrangement between the European Parliament and the European Public Prosecutor's Office, the EPPO will inform Parliament about ongoing or closed investigations in which Parliament appears to be in a position to take precautionary measures to protect the financial interests of the Union including disciplinary procedures or recovery procedures within the applicable time limits;’	Roll call	513 for, 135 against, 7 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
13	Paragraph 21 — part 2 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 21/2 Part voted on: “notes that criminal proceedings should not be automatically used as a generalised justification for possible inaction;”	Roll call	527 for, 115 against, 5 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
14	Separate vote on paragraph 26	Counted	283 for, 352 against, 18 abstained Rejected	Requested byseparate: EPP
15	Amendment 35 to paragraph 29 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 29 – Am 35	Roll call	206 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
16	Paragraph 29 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Notes that the Commission has acknowledged allegations regarding the use of Union funds for advocacy activities targeting Parliament by several entities but has stated that such activities fall within the scope of the applicable regulation;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Greens
17	Paragraph 29 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “recognises, however, that this might have nonetheless entailed reputational risks;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Greens
18	Separate vote on paragraph 30	Show of hands	Rejected
19	Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 31 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 31 – Am 38	Roll call	212 for, 442 against, 4 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: S&D, Patriots
20	Separate vote on paragraph 34	Show of hands	Rejected
21	Paragraph 39 — part 1 of 4 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘mainstreaming and budgeting’, ‘urges consistent gender budgeting in Parliament’s budget and the incorporation of a gender mainstreaming guide;’ and ‘further calls for strengthened gender mainstreaming across parliamentary committees;’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots, EPP
22	Paragraph 39 — part 2 of 4 Part voted on: “mainstreaming and budgeting”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots, EPP
23	Paragraph 39 — part 3 of 4 Part voted on: ‘urges consistent gender budgeting in Parliament’s budget and the incorporation of a gender mainstreaming guide;’	Counted	274 for, 362 against, 15 abstained Rejected	Requested bysplit: Patriots, EPP
24	Paragraph 39 — part 4 of 4 Part voted on: “further calls for strengthened gender mainstreaming across parliamentary committees;”	Counted	274 for, 354 against, 16 abstained Rejected	Requested bysplit: Patriots, EPP
25	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 39	Show of hands	Rejected
26	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 39	Show of hands	Rejected
27	Amendment 39 to paragraph 43 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 43 – Am 39	Roll call	196 for, 440 against, 14 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
28	Amendment 15 to paragraph 44 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 44 – Am 15	Roll call	306 for, 323 against, 23 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Renew
29	Separate vote on paragraph 44	Counted	296 for, 292 against, 66 abstained Adopted
30	Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 46 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 46 – Am 40	Roll call	205 for, 439 against, 7 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
31	Paragraph 51 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stakeholders and opinion leaders’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
32	Paragraph 51 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
33	Amendment 41 to paragraph 53 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 53 – Am 41	Roll call	201 for, 444 against, 11 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
34	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 54	Show of hands	Rejected
35	Separate vote on paragraph 56	Show of hands	Rejected
36	Separate vote on paragraph 56	Show of hands	Rejected
37	Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 58 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 58 – Am 43	Roll call	201 for, 419 against, 31 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
38	Separate vote on paragraph 59	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested bysplit: Patriots
39	Separate vote on paragraph 59	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
40	Separate vote on paragraph 59	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
41	Separate vote on paragraph 65	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: Patriots
42	Paragraph 67 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: ‘Acknowledges that the work of APAs is an integral part of the work of Members and therefore of Parliament; notes that following the adoption of the APA statute in 2009, their status over the years has been protected by the rules; notes the efforts made by Parliament to create a framework for providing support to APAs; calls for due adherence to the rules in place; notes, that since then, APAs participate in official missions to Parliament’s three places of work; welcomes that the rules concerning the reimbursement of APAs’ missions between the three place of work have been aligned with those applicable to officials, ensuring equality of treatment for APAs; calls on the Bureau and on Parliament’s administration to formally consult the APA Committee on revisions and reforms that directly impact the rights of APAs; calls on Parliament's administration to explore the feasibility of introducing a notice period within APAs’ contracts in the event of the unexpected departure of a Member;’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
43	Paragraph 67 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘reiterates its call on the Conference of Presidents and the Bureau to revise the implementing provisions governing the work of delegations and missions outside the Union; underlines that such a revision should consider the possibility for APAs, subject to certain conditions, to accompany Members on official Parliament delegations and missions; highlights that this change would not result in any change to the envelope and would be budget neutral;'	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
44	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 67	Counted	330 for, 293 against, 26 abstained Adopted
45	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 67	Show of hands	Rejected
46	Paragraph 68 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘invites the Bureau to explore the possibility of allowing APAs, under yet to be determined conditions, to participate in internal competitions in a similar way to Parliament’s staff;’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
47	Paragraph 68 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”	Counted	440 for, 151 against, 59 abstained Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
48	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 71	Show of hands	Rejected
49	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 72	Show of hands	Rejected
50	Separate vote on paragraph 73	Show of hands	Rejected
51	Separate vote on paragraph 73	Show of hands	Rejected
52	Separate vote on paragraph 74	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: Patriots
53	Amendment 14 to paragraph 75 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 75 – Am 14	Roll call	251 for, 304 against, 104 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Members
54	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 77	Show of hands	Rejected
55	Amendment 46 to paragraph 80 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 80 – Am 46	Roll call	147 for, 494 against, 15 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
56	Separate vote on paragraph 80	Counted	549 for, 59 against, 28 abstained Adopted	Requested byseparate: EPP
57	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 80	Show of hands	Rejected
58	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 80	Show of hands	Rejected
59	Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 81 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 81 – Am 47	Roll call	158 for, 438 against, 47 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
60	Amendment 48 to paragraph 82 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 82 – Am 48	Roll call	202 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
61	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 85	Show of hands	Rejected
62	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 86	Show of hands	Rejected
63	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 87	Show of hands	Rejected
64	Separate vote on paragraph 94	Show of hands	Rejected
65	Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 94 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 94 – Am 53	Roll call	202 for, 430 against, 9 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
66	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 103	Counted	234 for, 335 against, 62 abstained Rejected
67	Separate vote on paragraph 105	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested bysplit: EPP
68	Separate vote on paragraph 105	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
69	Separate vote on paragraph 105	Counted	240 for, 313 against, 74 abstained Rejected	Requested bysplit: EPP
70	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 105	Show of hands	Rejected
71	Separate vote on paragraph 106	Counted	274 for, 313 against, 48 abstained Rejected	Requested byseparate: EPP
72	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 106	Show of hands	Rejected
73	Separate vote on paragraph 118	Counted	339 for, 291 against, 19 abstained Adopted
74	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 121	Counted	388 for, 214 against, 48 abstained Adopted
75	Amendment 26 to paragraph 122 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 122 – Am 26	Roll call	215 for, 426 against, 4 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: ECR
76	Paragraph 122 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Welcomes the increased use of the Transparency Register as an information and reference tool for interest representation activities at Union level; welcomes the development of IT solutions to improve the Transparency Register, but notes that its Secretariat is still underfunded and understaffed; notes that the quality of entries in the Transparency Register has improved and recalls the necessity to keep strengthening data quality checks of new applicants; welcomes the establishment of robust standards at Parliament with regard to transparency and access to institutions for entities listed in the Transparency Register; calls for inter-linking the Transparency Register and the Financial Transparency System in order to allow cross-checks of entities listed in the Transparency Register and verify the adequacy of the data submitted; reiterates, in this context, the need for comprehensive financial pre-screening of all entities before they are listed in the Transparency Register, and calls in this respect for the Transparency Register to be provided with adequate resources for its functioning and for the effective enforcement of its internal rules;”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Renew
77	Paragraph 122 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: ‘further calls on Parliament’s administration to ensure interinstitutional media transparency and to disclose all media outlets receiving Union funds;’	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Renew
78	Amendment 13 to paragraph 123 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 123 – Am 13D	Roll call	275 for, 374 against, 8 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
79	Separate vote on paragraph 130	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested byseparate: Greens
80	Separate vote on paragraph 133	Show of hands	Rejected
81	Paragraph 137 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘for two reasons, the first’ and ‘and the fact that the final accounts that were audited for the first half of 2024 of one of the political groups (ID Group) contained serious irregularities; notes that the Vice-Presidents, in the hearing on 8 December, also indicated that there was additional information asked regarding the accounts for the second half of 2024, which was still awaited by the Bureau before taking a decision on providing the information to the discharge authority; notes the letter of 20 January 2026 of the Parliament’s Secretary-General to the Chair of the Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control submitting the audit reports for the second half of 2024 for seven of the eight political groups; notes the unqualified opinion for each report; notes that the report of the PfE Group for the second half of 2024 is still missing because of ongoing exchanges between that political group and Parliament’s competent services; calls on both the PfE Group and Parliament’s competent services to swiftly resolve the open issues and inform the discharge authority of the outcome;’”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
82	Paragraph 137 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
83	Amendment 22 to paragraph 138 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 138 – Am 22	Roll call	289 for, 349 against, 16 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Greens
84	Separate vote on paragraph 138	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
85	Paragraph 138 — part 1 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 138/1 Part voted on: “Notes media reports accusing the PfE Group of misusing at least EUR 171 644 in funds during the second half of 2024;”	Roll call	462 for, 159 against, 32 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
86	Paragraph 138 — part 2 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 138/2 Part voted on: ‘notes that Parliament’s administration has requested clarification from the PfE Group; notes that the discharge authority has not yet been informed but expects to be informed without delay of any further developments and of the outcome of the administrative follow-up in this matter;’	Roll call	444 for, 131 against, 77 abstained Adopted	Requested byroll call: S&D; split: Patriots
87	Separate vote on paragraph 140	Show of hands	Rejected	Requested bysplit: EPP
88	Separate vote on paragraph 140	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
89	Separate vote on paragraph 140	Counted	266 for, 242 against, 140 abstained Adopted	Requested bysplit: EPP
90	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 140	Show of hands	Rejected
91	Amendment 57 to paragraph 146 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 146 – Am 57	Roll call	177 for, 435 against, 37 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
92	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 147	Counted	287 for, 329 against, 32 abstained Rejected
93	Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 149 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 149 – Am 58	Roll call	203 for, 442 against, 6 abstained Rejected	Requested byroll call: Patriots
94	Vote on text inserted after paragraph 149	Show of hands	Rejected
95	Recital H — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “whereas gender equality and the elimination of inequalities are core values of the Union as enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU); whereas the Union is committed to promoting gender equality in all its activities under Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, thereby establishing the principle of gender mainstreaming”	Show of hands	Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
96	Recital H — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “and gender budgeting;”	Counted	448 for, 192 against, 13 abstained Adopted	Requested bysplit: Patriots
97	Final vote — text as a whole A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)	Roll call	441 for, 131 against, 81 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by Greens, S&D, Renew, ECR, Patriots, Members · split votes by Greens (2), Renew, EPP (5), Patriots (8) · separate votes by Greens, EPP, Patriots.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0081

What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament granted discharge to its President for implementing the EU general budget for 2024, covering Parliament's own section.

This approves how Parliament spent its funds for that year, following scrutiny of accounts and management.

Parliament also adopted a resolution with observations, including calls for gender equality measures.

Read the text · Report a problem

The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament grants discharge to its President for the 2024 budget, approving the implementation of Section I. The accompanying resolution sets out observations on financial management, internal control, and political priorities.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2146(DEC) · Discharge procedure

Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Parliament

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 10 September 2026 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier

Referred to committee · 9 September 2025 (done)
Committee work · Report adopted 2 March 2026 (done)
Tabled for plenary · 30 March 2026 (done)
Plenary vote · Adopted 29 April 2026 (done)
Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: CONT · Rapporteur: Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 16 connections: Running issue: Annual budget discharge procedure · Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers

Running issue: Annual budget discharge procedure

Issue Annual budget discharge procedure Running issue · Event 29 Apr 2026
Decision Discharge 2024: Joint Undertakings Budget decision · report by Csaba Molnár 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: Agencies Budget decision · report by Monika Hohlmeier 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Data Protection Supervisor Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Committee of the Regions Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted

Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers

Decision Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024 Resolution · report by Dick Erixon 28 Apr 2026 Adopted
Decision Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024 Resolution · report by Julien Sanchez 28 Apr 2026 Rejected
Decision Control, transparency and traceability of performance-based instruments Resolution · report by Monika Hohlmeier 28 Apr 2026 Adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission Budget decision · report by Daniel Freund 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and Council Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Auditors Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action Service Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted
Decision Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Ombudsman Budget decision · report by Pasquale Tridico 29 Apr 2026 Discharge decision adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/10
Official source: Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament”. Decision, 29 April 2026. votingId 191884, document A-10-2026-0081, reference 2025/2146(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/10 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Results of votes, sitting of 29 April 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-04-29/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-decision-2026-04-29-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-04-29},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/10}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-04-29/10},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 191884, document A-10-2026-0081, reference 2025/2146(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-04-29-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-04-29 (CC BY 4.0)}
}