Member

Marieke EHLERS

Patriots · Netherlands

Group: Patriots PfE
Country: Netherlands
Roll-call participation: 97.6 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes
With majority line: 74.3 %ⓘ of 604 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 80.0 %

More facts (5)

National party: PVV Partij voor de Vrijheid
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 81 of 476 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), DEVE (substitute), LIBE
Member id: 192254

National party: PVV Partij voor de Vrijheid
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 81 of 476 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO (substitute), DEVE (substitute), LIBE
Member id: 192254

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.6 %

605 of 620 final votes while in office

Patriots median: 90.8 % (+6.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

74.3 %

449 of 604 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 80.0 % (−5.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

17.0 %

81 of 476 votes where their group had a clear line

36 opposite (for ↔ against), 33 abstained against the line, 12 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

15.0 %

91 of 605 votes cast

Participation 97.6 % — Patriots median 90.8 %, 89 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Marieke EHLERS	97.6 %
Patriots median	90.8 %
Lowest in the group	44.2 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	89

With majority line 74.3 % — Patriots median 80.0 %, 89 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Marieke EHLERS	74.3 %
Patriots median	80.0 %
Lowest in the group	59.5 %
Highest in the group	94.8 %
Members	89

Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	6
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	1	1
23 Jan 2025	4	4
11 Feb 2025	4	1
12 Feb 2025	4	4
13 Feb 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	4	4
12 Mar 2025	7	7
13 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	7	7
2 Apr 2025	9	9
3 Apr 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	4	4
7 May 2025	20	19
8 May 2025	12	12
22 May 2025	6	0
17 Jun 2025	8	8
18 Jun 2025	7	7
19 Jun 2025	6	6
8 Jul 2025	8	8
9 Jul 2025	14	14
10 Jul 2025	7	7
9 Sept 2025	6	6
10 Sept 2025	15	15
11 Sept 2025	8	8
7 Oct 2025	4	4
8 Oct 2025	10	9
9 Oct 2025	10	10
21 Oct 2025	8	8
22 Oct 2025	6	6
23 Oct 2025	5	5
13 Nov 2025	16	16
25 Nov 2025	13	13
26 Nov 2025	10	10
27 Nov 2025	11	11
16 Dec 2025	11	11
17 Dec 2025	11	11
18 Dec 2025	6	6
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	9
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	12
28 Apr 2026	14	14
29 Apr 2026	17	17
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	11
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	15
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	11
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Rachel BLOM	Rachel BLOM	Patriots	Netherlands	99 % of 5 636 shared	74 %
Select Ton DIEPEVEEN	Ton DIEPEVEEN	Patriots	Netherlands	99 % of 5 336 shared	74 %
Select Auke ZIJLSTRA	Auke ZIJLSTRA	Patriots	Netherlands	99 % of 5 486 shared	74 %
Select Mieke ANDRIESE	Mieke ANDRIESE	Patriots	Netherlands	99 % of 2 704 shared	74 %
Select Sebastian KRUIS	Sebastian KRUIS	Patriots	Netherlands	98 % of 5 100 shared	74 %
Select Sebastiaan STÖTELER	Sebastiaan STÖTELER Former member	Patriots	Netherlands	98 % of 2 146 shared	74 %
Select Vilis KRIŠTOPANS	Vilis KRIŠTOPANS	Patriots	Latvia	82 % of 5 291 shared	74 %
Select Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Patriots	Belgium	81 % of 5 723 shared	74 %
Select Barbara BONTE	Barbara BONTE	Patriots	Belgium	81 % of 5 688 shared	74 %
Select Gerolf ANNEMANS	Gerolf ANNEMANS	Patriots	Belgium	80 % of 4 975 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	78 % of 5 013 shared	68 %
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI changed group	ESN	Italy	78 % of 2 227 shared	68 %
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	ECR	France	77 % of 5 565 shared	68 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	77 % of 4 967 shared	68 %
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	77 % of 4 469 shared	69 %
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	ECR	France	77 % of 5 230 shared	68 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	77 % of 5 298 shared	70 %
Select Sarah KNAFO	Sarah KNAFO	ESN	France	76 % of 4 352 shared	70 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	76 % of 5 178 shared	70 %
Select Markus BUCHHEIT	Markus BUCHHEIT	ESN	Germany	76 % of 5 272 shared	70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Substitute	4 Mar 2026	now
Delegation for relations with the Pan-African ParliamentDPAP Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDCAB Parliamentary assembly	Member	9 Mar 2026	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	23 Nov 2025

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure on proxy voting during pregnancy and immediately after childbirth	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	10 Sept 2026
EU Gender Action Plan IV – priorities for gender equality and women’s rights in external action	Shadow rapporteur	DEVE	8 Sept 2026
Measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens of the Union in third countries	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	24 Apr 2026
Amending the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	30 Mar 2026
Issuance of and technical standards for digital travel credentials based on identity cards	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	20 Feb 2026
Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	13 Feb 2026
Amendments to Parliament's Rules of Procedure concerning appointments to Union agencies and bodies (Rule 135)	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	15 Jan 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFCO	28 Oct 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	15 Oct 2025
Establishing a common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union, and repealing Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, Council Directive 2001/40/EC and Council Decision 2004/191/EC	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	2 May 2025

Show all 24 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

48 contributions recorded; 11 on behalf of their group; 63 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech	Read
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 May 2026	Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban's adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts (RC-B10-0247/2026, B10-0246/2026, B10-0247/2026, B10-0249/2026, B10-0251/2026, B10-0252/2026, B10-0254/2026, B10-0255/2026, B10-0258/2026) (vote)	Speech	Read
19 May 2026	EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Amendment of the European Electoral Act allowing Members to vote in plenary by proxy voting during pregnancy and after giving birth (A10-0123/2026 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar) (vote) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
28 Apr 2026	Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	Order of business on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Rise of political violence, notably by far-left organisations (debate)	Speech	Read
11 Mar 2026	Rise of political violence, notably by far-left organisations (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Spain’s large-scale regularisation policy and its impact on the Schengen Area and EU migration policy (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (continuation of debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	The urgent need to combat discrimination in the EU through the horizontal anti-discrimination directive (topical debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Communication on the European Democracy Shield (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Communication on the European Democracy Shield (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
13 Nov 2025	Proxy voting in plenary for Members during pregnancy and after giving birth (A10-0214/2025 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar) (vote)	Speech	Read
13 Nov 2025	Proxy voting in plenary for Members during pregnancy and after giving birth (A10-0214/2025 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar) (vote)	Speech	Read
13 Nov 2025	Proxy voting in plenary for Members during pregnancy and after giving birth (A10-0214/2025 - Juan Fernando López Aguilar) (vote) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Nov 2025	The first European Annual Asylum and Migration report and the setting up of the Annual Solidarity Pool (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Nov 2025	Commemorating the 10th anniversary of the islamist attacks of 13 November 2015 in Paris (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Oct 2025	Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	Rising antisemitism in Europe (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Sept 2025	Need for a strong European Democracy Shield to enhance democracy, protect the EU from foreign interference and hybrid threats, and protect electoral processes in the EU (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Sept 2025	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Sept 2025	Announcement by the President	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2025	Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 26 June 2025 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 Jun 2025	Institutional and political implications of the EU enlargement process and global challenges (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2025	The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 May 2025	Order of business on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 May 2025	80 years after the end of World War II - freedom, democracy and security as the heritage of Europe (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 May 2025	High levels of retail food prices and their consequences for European consumers (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
1 Apr 2025	Presentation of the New European Internal Security Strategy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2025	Presentation of the proposal on a new common approach on returns (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
12 Feb 2025	US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, the World Health Organisation and the suspension of US development and humanitarian aid (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Feb 2025	US withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, the World Health Organisation and the suspension of US development and humanitarian aid (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 Jan 2025	Addressing EU demographic challenges: towards the implementation of the 2023 Demography Toolbox (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Questions and motions, 113

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
15 Sept 2026	Migrant invasion in Ceuta: much-needed vigilance E-10-2026-003663	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	Not yet answered
15 Sept 2026	Alleged EU competence in the field of housing E-10-2026-003675	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
14 Jul 2026	Community Note E-10-2026-002912	Written question	18 Sept 2026
14 Jul 2026	Transparency regarding changes to the Commission’s social media posts E-10-2026-002908	Written question	21 Sept 2026
2 Jul 2026	EIB financing for infrastructure in Morocco and lack of cooperation on repatriation P-10-2026-002749	Priority written question	19 Aug 2026
24 Jun 2026	Use of payment data by payment service providers and the purpose limitation principle of Article 5 GDPR E-10-2026-002602	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
17 Jun 2026	Scientific basis for the Commission’s policy references to ‘transgender youth’ following its evasive reply to E-000395/2026 E-10-2026-002509	Written questionwith 2 co-authors	4 Aug 2026
11 Jun 2026	Instrumentalisation of migration flows and political coercion of Member States E-10-2026-002418	Written questionwith 1 co-author	16 Sept 2026
22 May 2026	Conclusion of the 10th European Migration Forum (EMF) E-10-2026-002125	Written question	31 Aug 2026

Show all 113 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 41

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
24 Jun 2026	Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790146	LIBE	16
24 Jun 2026	Establishing the Union support for internal security for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790119	LIBE	20
24 Jun 2026	Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034 LIBE-AM-790113	LIBE	8
12 Jun 2026	Measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens of the Union in third countries LIBE-AM-789972	LIBE	10
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789068	CJ19	1
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789070	CJ19	3
29 Apr 2026	Institutional aspects of artificial intelligence in the context of European integration AFCO-AM-787899	AFCO	12
8 Apr 2026	Establishing Global Europe LIBE-AM-786903	LIBE	24
8 Apr 2026	Establishing Global Europe LIBE-AM-786907	LIBE	10
27 Mar 2026	European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded AFCO-AM-786733	AFCO	3

Show all 41 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism

National delegation

Delegation Netherlands National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/192254?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marieke EHLERS”. Member record. memberId 192254. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/192254?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/192254. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/192254?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-192254,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marieke EHLERS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/192254?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/192254?scope=final&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 192254. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/192254. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Patriots

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 113

Amendments tabled in committee, 41

Connections

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928