Member

Mieke ANDRIESE

Patriots · Netherlands

Group: Patriots PfE
Country: Netherlands
Roll-call participation: 91.8 %ⓘ of 2 979 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 78.7 %ⓘ of 2 727 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %

More facts (5)

National party: PVV Partij voor de Vrijheid
In office: Since 20 Nov 2025
Against clear line: 266 of 2 145 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, FEMM (substitute), LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 130881

National party: PVV Partij voor de Vrijheid
In office: Since 20 Nov 2025
Against clear line: 266 of 2 145 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, FEMM (substitute), LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 130881

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.8 %

2 736 of 2 979 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (+0.7 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

78.7 %

2 145 of 2 727 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (−4.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

12.4 %

266 of 2 145 votes where their group had a clear line

112 opposite (for ↔ against), 106 abstained against the line, 48 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

8.7 %

237 of 2 736 votes cast

Participation 91.8 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Mieke ANDRIESE	91.8 %
Patriots median	91.1 %
Lowest in the group	44.5 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	89

With majority line 78.7 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Mieke ANDRIESE	78.7 %
Patriots median	82.7 %
Lowest in the group	72.5 %
Highest in the group	92.9 %
Members	89

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 2 979

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 4 of 42 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	0
26 Nov 2025	100	99
27 Nov 2025	125	124
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	42
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	112
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	141
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	196
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	224
29 Apr 2026	296	295
30 Apr 2026	68	68
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	96
21 May 2026	98	98
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	125
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	144
9 Jul 2026	67	65
14 Sept 2026	1	0
15 Sept 2026	155	0
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Rachel BLOM	Rachel BLOM	Patriots	Netherlands	99 % of 2 577 shared	74 %
Select Marieke EHLERS	Marieke EHLERS	Patriots	Netherlands	99 % of 2 704 shared	74 %
Select Auke ZIJLSTRA	Auke ZIJLSTRA	Patriots	Netherlands	99 % of 2 593 shared	74 %
Select Ton DIEPEVEEN	Ton DIEPEVEEN	Patriots	Netherlands	99 % of 2 617 shared	74 %
Select Sebastian KRUIS	Sebastian KRUIS	Patriots	Netherlands	98 % of 2 379 shared	74 %
Select Barbara BONTE	Barbara BONTE	Patriots	Belgium	80 % of 2 725 shared	74 %
Select Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Patriots	Belgium	80 % of 2 671 shared	74 %
Select Vilis KRIŠTOPANS	Vilis KRIŠTOPANS	Patriots	Latvia	80 % of 2 549 shared	74 %
Select Hermann TERTSCH	Hermann TERTSCH	Patriots	Spain	79 % of 1 560 shared	74 %
Select Gerolf ANNEMANS	Gerolf ANNEMANS	Patriots	Belgium	79 % of 2 214 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	78 % of 2 539 shared	68 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	77 % of 2 558 shared	70 %
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	ECR	France	77 % of 2 642 shared	68 %
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	ECR	France	77 % of 2 688 shared	68 %
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI changed group	ESN	Italy	77 % of 2 096 shared	68 %
Select Alexander JUNGBLUTH	Alexander JUNGBLUTH	ESN	Germany	77 % of 2 722 shared	70 %
Select Hans NEUHOFF	Hans NEUHOFF	ESN	Germany	77 % of 2 121 shared	70 %
Select Arno BAUSEMER	Arno BAUSEMER	ESN	Germany	76 % of 2 629 shared	70 %
Select Anja ARNDT	Anja ARNDT	ESN	Germany	76 % of 2 124 shared	70 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	76 % of 2 521 shared	68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	24 Nov 2025	now
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM Committee	Substitute	21 Nov 2025	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	21 Nov 2025	now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI Subcommittee	Substitute	21 Nov 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	24 Nov 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Substitute	21 Nov 2025	now

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFET	1 Sept 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	1 Jul 2026
EU Gender Action Plan IV – priorities for gender equality and women’s rights in external action	Shadow rapporteur	FEMM	1 Jul 2026
EU-Syria political relations	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	18 May 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	23 Apr 2026
EU enlargement strategy	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	2 Mar 2026
2025 Commission report on Türkiye	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	9 Feb 2026
Recommendation for the Council, for the Commission and for the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the region	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	9 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	FEMM	9 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFET	29 Jan 2026

Show all 13 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

7 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 9 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	2025 Commission report on Türkiye (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 May 2026	Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Brutal repression against protesters in Iran (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 7 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 41

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION political prisoners in Cuba, the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0409	Motion for a resolutionwith 4 co-authors	—
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
22 Jul 2026	EU support for the International Criminal Court (ICC) E-10-2026-003073	Written question	27 Aug 2026
22 Jul 2026	NDICI-Global Europe’s contribution to regional normalisation between Israel and Arab states P-10-2026-003083	Priority written question	28 Aug 2026
16 Jul 2026	Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035	Written questionwith 42 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026	Developments in Romania as a precedent for halting further EU enlargement E-10-2026-002798	Written question	19 Aug 2026
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0349	Motion for a resolutionwith 7 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	Exclusion of EU accession prospects for Armenia as a matter of principle E-10-2026-002467	Written question	28 Jul 2026
11 Jun 2026	Instrumentalisation of migration flows and political coercion of Member States E-10-2026-002418	Written questionwith 1 co-author	16 Sept 2026
3 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271	Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors	—

Show all 41 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 9

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
16 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections AFET-AM-791057	AFET	10
13 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 – all sections FEMM-AM-790126	FEMM	8
15 Jun 2026	EU-Syria political relations AFET-AM-789951	AFET	49
22 Apr 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine AFET-AM-786697	AFET	1
14 Apr 2026	Recommendation for the Council, for the Commission and for the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the region AFET-AM-787006	AFET	10
12 Mar 2026	2025 Commission report on Türkiye AFET-AM-785351	AFET	12
12 Mar 2026	2025 Commission report on Türkiye AFET-AM-785350	AFET	19
6 Mar 2026	2025 Commission report on North Macedonia AFET-AM-785322	AFET	9
20 Feb 2026	Recommendation for the Council, for the Commission and for the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly AFET-AM-784240	AFET	14

Show all 9 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism

National delegation

Delegation Netherlands National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/130881?seats=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Mieke ANDRIESE”. Member record. memberId 130881. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/130881?seats=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/130881. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/130881?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-130881,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Mieke ANDRIESE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/130881?seats=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/130881?seats=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 130881. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/130881. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 2 979

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Patriots

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 41

Amendments tabled in committee, 9

Connections

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 2 979