Member

Gilles PENNELLE

Patriots · France

Group: Patriots PfE
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 97.7 %ⓘ of 5 928 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line: 92.4 %ⓘ of 5 771 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %

More facts (5)

National party: RN Rassemblement national
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 36 of 4 608 votesⓘ
Committees: AGRI, EMPL (substitute)
Member id: 126699

National party: RN Rassemblement national
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 36 of 4 608 votesⓘ
Committees: AGRI, EMPL (substitute)
Member id: 126699

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.7 %

5 792 of 5 928 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (+6.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

92.4 %

5 332 of 5 771 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (+9.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.8 %

36 of 4 608 votes where their group had a clear line

12 opposite (for ↔ against), 24 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

11.2 %

646 of 5 792 votes cast

Participation 97.7 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Gilles PENNELLE	97.7 %
Patriots median	91.1 %
Lowest in the group	44.5 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	89

With majority line 92.4 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Gilles PENNELLE	92.4 %
Patriots median	82.7 %
Lowest in the group	72.5 %
Highest in the group	92.9 %
Members	89

Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 107 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	23	21
18 Jul 2024	1	1
16 Sept 2024	2	2
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	92	92
7 Oct 2024	2	2
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	18	18
10 Oct 2024	4	3
21 Oct 2024	2	2
22 Oct 2024	10	10
23 Oct 2024	129	129
24 Oct 2024	13	13
13 Nov 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	36	36
25 Nov 2024	2	2
26 Nov 2024	18	18
27 Nov 2024	11	11
28 Nov 2024	57	57
17 Dec 2024	13	13
18 Dec 2024	33	33
19 Dec 2024	45	32
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	43
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	30
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	19
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	227
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	251
3 Apr 2025	62	62
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	220
8 May 2025	103	75
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	48
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	86
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	130
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	100
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	4
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	12
22 Oct 2025	186	185
23 Oct 2025	55	46
13 Nov 2025	267	266
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	124
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	41
20 Jan 2026	67	66
21 Jan 2026	112	109
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	37
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	105
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	196
11 Mar 2026	60	59
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	225
29 Apr 2026	296	296
30 Apr 2026	68	67
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	95
21 May 2026	98	98
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	126
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	142
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	1
15 Sept 2026	155	154
16 Sept 2026	80	80
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN	Marie-Luce BRASIER-CLAIN	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 788 shared	74 %
Select Jean-Paul GARRAUD	Jean-Paul GARRAUD	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 335 shared	74 %
Select Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT	Anne-Sophie FRIGOUT	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 152 shared	74 %
Select Julien LEONARDELLI	Julien LEONARDELLI	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 491 shared	74 %
Select Séverine WERBROUCK	Séverine WERBROUCK	Patriots	France	100 % of 4 989 shared	74 %
Select Marie DAUCHY	Marie DAUCHY	Patriots	France	100 % of 4 458 shared	74 %
Select Valérie DELOGE	Valérie DELOGE	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 645 shared	74 %
Select André ROUGÉ	André ROUGÉ	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 606 shared	74 %
Select Fabrice LEGGERI	Fabrice LEGGERI	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 443 shared	74 %
Select Pierre PIMPIE	Pierre PIMPIE	Patriots	France	100 % of 5 637 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Sarah KNAFO	Sarah KNAFO	ESN	France	78 % of 4 370 shared	70 %
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	78 % of 5 024 shared	68 %
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	ECR	France	77 % of 5 554 shared	68 %
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	ECR	France	76 % of 5 218 shared	68 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	76 % of 4 964 shared	68 %
Select Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS	No group	Romania	73 % of 4 821 shared	51 %
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 473 shared	69 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	71 % of 5 296 shared	70 %
Select Hans NEUHOFF	Hans NEUHOFF	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 313 shared	70 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	70 % of 5 170 shared	70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with IndiaD-IN Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working group	Member	20 Feb 2025	now

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	17 Jun 2026
Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AGRI	8 Jan 2026
Adjustment of customs duties on the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America and opening of tariff quotas for imports of certain goods originating in the United States of America	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AGRI	11 Dec 2025
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AGRI	14 Jul 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2021/2115 and (EU) No 251/2014 as regards certain market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	23 Jun 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AGRI	30 Jan 2025
No dossier named	Delegation chair	D-IN	26 Sept 2024
2024/0027(COD) Granting equivalence with EU requirements to Moldova and Ukraine as regards field inspections and production of seed	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	23 Sept 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

45 contributions recorded; 8 on behalf of their group; 54 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
8 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (A10-0172/2026 - Michael Gahler) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	EU-Mexico (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Preparation of the European Council (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
30 Apr 2026	How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 19 March 2026 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Multilateral negotiations in view of the WTO’s 14th Ministerial Conference in Yaoundé, 26 to 29 March 2026 (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Cutting red tape to enable a competitive and clean transition – the urgent need to shorten and simplify permitting (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
12 Feb 2026	Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 121

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
16 Sept 2026	European seed sovereignty E-10-2026-003723	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
10 Aug 2026	Putting an end to AdBlue-related fire engine breakdowns E-10-2026-003245	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	Not yet answered
5 Aug 2026	Coherence of EU policies on nature restoration, vineyard restructuring and forest fire prevention E-10-2026-003209	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	Not yet answered
17 Jul 2026	Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
16 Jul 2026	Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035	Written questionwith 42 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
16 Jul 2026	Traditional Speciality Guaranteed (TSG) ‘Fleur de Sel’ E-10-2026-003007	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	26 Aug 2026
15 Jul 2026	Commission’s ‘anti-racism’ strategy: towards a presumption that European societies are racist? E-10-2026-002952	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	21 Aug 2026
15 Jul 2026	Automotive industry turning more and more to temporary workers, and protection of those workers E-10-2026-002959	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	Agricultural land grabbing in the EU and the appropriation of CAP funds by foreign interests E-10-2026-002740	Written questionwith 13 co-authors	18 Aug 2026
18 Jun 2026	New Caledonian nickel industry and Europeans’ strategic autonomy E-10-2026-002537	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	7 Aug 2026

Show all 121 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 84

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
28 Jul 2026	Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-791123	ENVI	14
20 Jul 2026	Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ENVI-AM-790834	ENVI	11
17 Jul 2026	Strengthening competitiveness, resilience and fairness in EU agriculture AGRI-AM-791100	AGRI	17
17 Jul 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790898	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958	AGRI	9
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790916	AGRI	5
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790918	AGRI	16
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790899	AGRI	12
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915	AGRI	7
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790955	AGRI	6

Show all 84 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/126699?roles=all&rows=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Gilles PENNELLE”. Member record. memberId 126699. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/126699?roles=all&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/126699. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/126699?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-126699,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Gilles PENNELLE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/126699?roles=all&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/126699?roles=all&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 126699. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/126699. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Patriots

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 121

Amendments tabled in committee, 84

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928