Skip to content

Member · Former member

Anders VISTISEN

Patriots · Denmark · left on 13 April 2026

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Denmark
Roll-call participation
85.5 %ⓘ of 4 245 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
84.2 %ⓘ of 3 621 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (4)
National party
O Dansk Folkeparti
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 13 Apr 2026 (left on 13 April 2026)
Against clear line
263 of 2 867 votesⓘ
Member id
124875
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.5 %

3 631 of 4 245 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (−5.6 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

84.2 %

3 048 of 3 621 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (+1.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.2 %

263 of 2 867 votes where their group had a clear line

115 opposite (for ↔ against), 128 abstained against the line, 20 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

11.8 %

428 of 3 631 votes cast

Participation 85.5 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Anders VISTISEN85.5 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 84.2 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Anders VISTISEN84.2 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 4 245

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 380 for, 182 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
19 Sept 2024EU/USA Agreement on the launch of Galileo satellites from U.S. Territory Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 582 for, 16 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 112 for, 485 against, 13 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 6 113 for, 441 against, 56 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 231 for, 326 against, 58 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Tie
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 219 for, 357 against, 41 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 209 for, 359 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Tie
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Separate vote on paragraph 6 356 for, 204 against, 55 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 241 for, 345 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 549 for, 21 against, 37 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
19 Sept 2024The severe situation of political prisoners in Belarus Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 6 255 for, 316 against, 23 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 565 for, 8 against, 43 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 1, adding text after recital D 177 for, 426 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 8 200 for, 400 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 8 182 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Paragraph 8 — part 2 444 for, 153 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
19 Sept 2024The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the ‘Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice’ Separate vote on paragraph 7 458 for, 90 against, 63 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
18 Sept 2024Maximum residue levels for cyproconazole Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 522 for, 127 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Sept 2024Maximum residue levels for carbendazim and thiophanate-methyl Final vote on the motion for a resolutionObjection passed 516 for, 129 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2024Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group 437 for, 13 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
16 Sept 2024Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group 102 for, 279 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
18 Jul 2024Request by The Left Group – Motion for adjournment of the vote on the election of the President of the Commission Request by The Left Group — Motion for adjournment of the vote 101 for, 531 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 495 for, 137 against, 47 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Separate vote on recital E 482 for, 165 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 96 for, 537 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 8 113 for, 497 against, 58 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 8 57 for, 427 against, 177 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 8 63 for, 564 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 7 414 for, 193 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 6 418 for, 168 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 5 468 for, 119 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 4 393 for, 178 against, 75 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 3 457 for, 133 against, 79 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Abstained
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 2 450 for, 165 against, 46 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 5 — part 1 483 for, 153 against, 32 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 9 to paragraph 5 35 for, 583 against, 45 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 3 498 for, 111 against, 52 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 2 518 for, 47 against, 76 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 4 — part 1 456 for, 166 against, 26 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 180 for, 436 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 194 for, 400 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Paragraph 3 — part 1 476 for, 107 against, 42 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
17 Jul 2024The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 91 for, 468 against, 20 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: For
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group 119 for, 337 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group 149 for, 251 against, 16 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: Against

Show all 45 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 87 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal89 % of 3 112 shared74 %
Vilis KRIŠTOPANS PatriotsLatvia87 % of 3 293 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal86 % of 3 445 shared74 %
Afroditi LATINOPOULOU PatriotsGreece86 % of 2 832 shared74 %
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland84 % of 3 155 shared74 %
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PatriotsPoland84 % of 3 173 shared74 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia82 % of 1 510 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium80 % of 3 568 shared74 %
Hermann TERTSCH PatriotsSpain80 % of 2 813 shared74 %
Marie DAUCHY PatriotsFrance80 % of 2 581 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance77 % of 3 106 shared68 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance76 % of 3 429 shared68 %
Marion MARÉCHAL ECRFrance76 % of 2 954 shared68 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance75 % of 2 592 shared70 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance75 % of 3 276 shared68 %
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany74 % of 2 500 shared68 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany73 % of 3 026 shared70 %
René AUST ESNGermany73 % of 3 259 shared70 %
Anja ARNDT ESNGermany72 % of 3 007 shared70 %
Alexander JUNGBLUTH ESNGermany72 % of 3 589 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

45 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 60 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Mar 2026Energy security, independence and supply in the geopolitical context - ensuring market stability and affordable energy for industry and citizens (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
10 Mar 2026EU enlargement strategy (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Feb 2026Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
22 Jan 2026Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
21 Jan 2026Restoring control of migration: returns, visa policy and third-country cooperation (topical debate) Speech · 2 minRead
20 Jan 2026Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 Jan 2026Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 26

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
3 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
23 Feb 2026Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein E-10-2026-000742Written question10 Jun 2026
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2026-0063Motion for a resolutionwith 109 co-authors—
19 Nov 2025Protecting citizens’ right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion O-10-2025-000042Oral questionwith 40 co-authorsNot yet answered
12 Nov 2025Upholding the EU institutions’ integrity in the face of networks with links to Hamas E-10-2025-004481Written questionwith 20 co-authors18 Mar 2026
14 Oct 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on declaring Antifa a terrorist organisation B-10-2025-0447Motion for a resolutionwith 79 co-authors—
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
4 Sept 2025Transparency of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority E-10-2025-003426Written question17 Nov 2025
1 Sept 2025Grooming expenses for European Commissioners E-10-2025-003348Written question27 Nov 2025

Show all 26 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
5 Feb 2026Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions FEMM-AM-782486 FEMM32

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Denmark National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Anders VISTISEN”. Member record. memberId 124875. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?page=85&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124875?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-124875,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Anders VISTISEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?page=85&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124875?page=85&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124875. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124875. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}