Skip to content

Member

Pina PICIERNO

Renew · Italy

Group
Renew Changed group: S&D 16 Jul 2024 – 16 Jun 2026 → Renew since 17 Jun 2026
Country
Italy
Roll-call participation
82.4 %ⓘ of 620 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.6 % · whole term, final votes Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.
With majority line
98.0 %ⓘ of 510 votes where the group had a line · compared per group under Record
More facts (5)
National party
SP Spazio Pubblico
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
4 of 497 votesⓘ
Committees
AFET (substitute), LIBE (substitute)
Member id
124846
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

82.4 %

511 of 620 final votes while in office

Chamber median: 90.6 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.0 %

500 of 510 votes where their group had a line

Against clear line ⓘ

0.8 %

4 of 497 votes where their group had a clear line

4 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.2 %

6 of 511 votes cast

Compared with each group they sat in

The member’s record in each group they sat in during the period, over the roll calls held while they sat in it (dates: the first and last of them). Each figure with its denominator: participation of the roll calls held, majority line of the votes where the group had one, against clear line of the votes where it had a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting), abstention of the votes cast. Median: that group’s median over the same roll calls, with the member’s difference in percentage points. A figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.
GroupParticipationWith majority lineAgainst clear lineAbstention
S&D 17 Jul 2024 – 16 Jun 202682.7 % of 525 median 88.8 % (−6.1 pts)99.3 % of 434 median 97.3 % (+2.0 pts)0.5 % of 4300.9 % of 434
Renew 17 Jun 2026 – 17 Sept 202681.1 % of 95 median 95.8 % (−14.7 pts)90.8 % of 76 median 93.2 % (−2.4 pts)3.0 % of 672.6 % of 77
  • Whole term, 620 final votes; 620 of 794 decisions had a final vote recorded by name.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
  • This member changed group in this period: each vote counts them in the group of that day, and they are compared with each group over the roll calls held while they sat in it — not with one group’s median.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 26 200 for, 417 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 193 for, 443 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 192 for, 462 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Final votePassed 542 for, 97 against, 12 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Amendment 4, adding text after recital 2 143 for, 424 against, 80 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 625 for, 7 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Amendment 3, adding text after recital 2 220 for, 416 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Amendment 2, adding text after recital 2 210 for, 429 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies Amendment 1 to recital 2 191 for, 452 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 10, adding text after recital D 237 for, 372 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 9 to recital B 351 for, 260 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 8, adding text after recital A 232 for, 407 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 — part 2 256 for, 249 against, 135 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 2 to paragraph 7 — part 1 615 for, 5 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 212 for, 363 against, 71 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 581 for, 16 against, 34 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 364 for, 261 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 3 235 for, 357 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
10 Jul 2025Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 511 for, 50 against, 75 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic Final vote on the motion for a resolutionAdopted 617 for, 4 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
10 Jul 2025Motion of censure on the Commission Final vote on the motion for a resolutionRejected 175 for, 360 against, 18 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 507 for, 77 against, 45 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 6, adding text after recital U 145 for, 509 against, 17 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 4 to paragraph 24 427 for, 181 against, 54 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 23 128 for, 500 against, 44 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23 73 for, 537 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 20 98 for, 511 against, 61 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 20 287 for, 364 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Paragraph 20 — part 2 516 for, 135 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 19 489 for, 160 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Separate vote on paragraph 18 466 for, 142 against, 57 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Paragraph 15 — part 2 489 for, 151 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 9 to paragraph 8 91 for, 524 against, 57 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 2 to paragraph 4 409 for, 160 against, 99 abstainedPosition: For ≠ groupMajority line: Against
9 Jul 2025The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civilians Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 116 for, 427 against, 115 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 422 for, 219 against, 31 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Separate vote on citation 16 423 for, 194 against, 53 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Separate vote on citation 15 370 for, 279 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 92 465 for, 176 against, 44 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 56 — part 2 321 for, 317 against, 41 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 56 — part 1 488 for, 87 against, 112 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Separate vote on paragraph 48 465 for, 118 against, 73 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Separate vote on paragraph 47 449 for, 191 against, 28 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 42 — part 6 414 for, 193 against, 52 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 42 — part 5 378 for, 179 against, 32 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 42 — part 4 423 for, 200 against, 38 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 42 — part 3 468 for, 180 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 42 — part 2 452 for, 172 against, 42 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 42 — part 1 461 for, 186 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Jul 2025Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum Paragraph 37 — part 7 367 for, 272 against, 22 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 18 of 80 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within the same group (on the day of each vote)

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Irene TINAGLI S&DItaly97 % of 4 038 shared93 %
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ S&DSpain97 % of 3 924 shared93 %
Giuseppe LUPO S&DItaly97 % of 4 102 shared93 %
Alessandra MORETTI S&DItaly97 % of 3 862 shared93 %
Camilla LAURETI S&DItaly97 % of 4 130 shared93 %
Pierfrancesco MARAN S&DItaly97 % of 3 865 shared93 %
Matteo RICCI S&DItaly97 % of 3 767 shared93 %
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly97 % of 3 066 shared92 %
Sérgio GONÇALVES S&DPortugal97 % of 4 055 shared93 %
Stefano BONACCINI S&DItaly97 % of 3 926 shared93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group RenewItaly91 % of 1 076 shared86 %
Dragoş BENEA S&DRomania90 % of 203 shared86 %
Charles GOERENS RenewLuxembourg89 % of 3 852 shared86 %
Pascal CANFIN RenewFrance89 % of 3 876 shared86 %
Martin HOJSÍK RenewSlovakia89 % of 3 995 shared86 %
Bernard GUETTA RenewFrance89 % of 3 695 shared86 %
Carla TAVARES S&DPortugal89 % of 408 shared86 %
Jana TOOM RenewEstonia89 % of 3 515 shared86 %
Dainius ŽALIMAS RenewLithuania89 % of 3 867 shared86 %
Valérie HAYER RenewFrance89 % of 4 093 shared86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET CommitteeSubstitute9 Jul 2026now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute9 Jul 2026now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeMember9 Jul 2026now
Delegation for relations with IsraelD-IL DelegationSubstitute9 Jul 2026now
Intergroup on Cancer and Rare DiseasesIG10-05 Intergroup / working groupMember27 Jan 2025now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working groupMember19 Feb 2025now
Intergroup on LGBTIQ+IG10-16 Intergroup / working groupMember13 May 2026now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202416 Jun 2026
Committee on PetitionsPETI CommitteeMember19 Jul 202416 Jun 2026
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committeeMember23 Jan 202516 Jun 2026

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
DossierRoleCommitteeDate
No dossier namedVice-President15 Jul 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

185 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 161 minutes of speaking time.

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 91

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
15 Sept 2026REPowerEU-funded redevelopment of public housing in Milan’s Lulli-Porpora district E-10-2026-003666Written questionwith 5 co-authorsNot yet answered
15 Jul 2026Update by the Commission of its guidelines on tackling online disinformation during electoral processes E-10-2026-002950Written questionwith 31 co-authors11 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026Impact of Court ruling on Hungarian anti-LGBTI propaganda law on similar law in Bulgaria E-10-2026-002806Written questionwith 18 co-authors15 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors—
29 Jun 2026Evasion of European sanctions through Türkiye in the case of machinery produced in Member States for the Russian military supply chain E-10-2026-002679Written questionwith 9 co-authors21 Aug 2026
29 Jun 2026Deterioration of Elene Khoshtaria’s health condition and political persecution in Georgia E-10-2026-002678Written questionwith 10 co-authors5 Aug 2026
26 Jun 2026Commission meeting with Taliban representatives and reported discussion on consular services P-10-2026-002653Priority written questionwith 21 co-authors26 Aug 2026
9 Jun 2026Protection of Italian citizen Nessy Guerra and her daughter, a minor, in Egypt E-10-2026-002377Written questionwith 23 co-authors7 Aug 2026
1 Jun 2026Exclusion of Keshet Italia from Rome Pride 2026 and anti-Semitism in civil rights movements E-10-2026-002218Written question31 Jul 2026
22 May 2026The theme parks sector E-10-2026-002124Written questionwith 3 co-authors28 Jul 2026

Show all 91 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 22

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 22 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

National delegation

  • Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
1 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Pina PICIERNO”. Member record. memberId 124846. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124846?page=78&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 1 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124846. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124846?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-124846,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Pina PICIERNO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124846?page=78&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124846?page=78&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-01},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124846. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124846. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}